similar to: Samba4 joining a domain as DC

I installed samba as an AD as described on the wiki and set up replication as described on the wiki. I checked and users are not replicated. I am getting the following messages Primary server (SambaCK): LOG: Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2013 [2013/08/12 08:48:46.359901, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:492(binary_smbd_main) samba: using 'standard' process model

HI, I have a Windows 2003 as AD PDC. My intention is disable this Windows and use Samba4 instead. I have compiled Samba 4.1.12 on Debian 7 without problems. I followed Samba Wiki to Join this machine to Win domain, without to do the Samba4 provision steps, as mentioned. The join process occurs without errors and all strutcture of Wind2003 was replicated to Samba4. All modifications done on

G'day Guys, I've hit a snag. After using S4 from Alpha, beta, rc, 4.0.1..16 with success, I wanted to upgrade to the 4.1 series. However, after compiling, installing, and provisioning, with no errors, samba4 won't start correctly. I did a few tests by installing from scratch, on the same server each of the following versions (4.0.17, 4.0.18, 4.0.19, and 4.1.9), and got the same

Dear All, Need some help as I was trying to follow the guide below. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC Until the steps of ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(invocationid=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid and my ldbsearch reply with such a result. ldb: unable to dlopen /usr/lib64/samba/ldb/acl.so : /usr/lib64/ldb/libreplace.so: version

Hello. I'm trying to perform a classic upgrade from Samba 3.6.6 with LDAP backend on Debian to 4.1.6 on Ubuntu on a new machine. The samba-tools creates the following *smb.con*f: *# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf** *[global] workgroup = SOMEDOM realm = somedom.local netbios name = SOMEDOM server role = member server passdb backend = samba_dsdb server

We finally managed to upgrade from samba 4.1 to 4.2.9 (sernet packages). We have two replicated samba ADs. After the upgrade everything seems to work as expected, but I'm constantly getting this error message in the logs. They weren't there before the upgrade: We used the Updating samba wiki entry as howto[1] The first dc logs this: Failed extended allocation RID pool operation -

Hello! I'm trying to get Samba4 working as an additional AD DC. bin/net vampire reports no errors, but when I start sbin/samba I got the following in my var/samba.log: -------------------- [Sun May 23 03:58:08 2010 MSD, 0 ../smbd/server.c:373:binary_smbd_main()] samba version 4.0.0alpha12-GIT-UNKNOWN started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2010 [Sun May 23 03:58:08

I am trying to join a Fedora Linux box running Samba 4.1.5 to a Windows Server 2000 domain controller as an additional domain controller. I should mention that our realm is the same as our domain name, adi.com. This is a 15 year old mistake. And the Windows DC does not have all of our machines listed. To work around that I have delegated _msdcs, _sites, _tcp and _udp to the Windows DC with name

Am 13.01.2019 um 10:44 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 08:09:52 +0100 > Anton Blau via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 12.01.2019 um 23:08 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 22:04:50 +0100 >>> Anton Blau via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>> Is this all you installed ? :

On 2017-04-07 13:44, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > In the end I just upgraded all DCs to 4.5 and remote-deleted the broken > ones. Seemed to work without a hitch, manual removal was only necessary > to remove the IPs from DNS\_msdcs.ourdomain\gc\. Apparently not, adding new DCs failed with "WERR_DS_DATABASE_ERROR". `samba-tool dbcheck --fix` solved that. With that out of

On 04/08/2016 08:36 AM, Johannes Amorosa | Celluloid VFX wrote: > We finally managed to upgrade from samba 4.1 to 4.2.9 (sernet > packages). We have two replicated samba ADs. After the upgrade > everything seems to > work as expected, but I'm constantly getting this error message in the > logs. They weren't there before the upgrade: > > We used the Updating samba

On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 15:20 +0200, Johannes Amorosa | Celluloid VFX wrote: > On 04/08/2016 08:36 AM, Johannes Amorosa | Celluloid VFX wrote: > > We finally managed to upgrade from samba 4.1 to 4.2.9 (sernet > > packages). We have two replicated samba ADs. After the upgrade > > everything seems to work as expected, but I'm constantly getting > > this error message

I keep getting errors in my logs about can not bind to address *.*.*.*:53 address in use.. what did i do wrong in the setup of my server or domain? attached logs and smb.conf along with the output from my provision command. Jeffrey D. Means meaje at meanspc.com Owner / CIO for MeansPC http://www.meanspc.com/ Custom Web Development For Your Needs. (970)308-1298 - The

On 2019/02/14 22:19, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:43:43 +0200 > Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On 2019/02/14 21:12, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 19:14:19 +0200 >>> Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi there >>>>

On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 18:00:24 +0200 Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2017-04-07 13:44, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > > In the end I just upgraded all DCs to 4.5 and remote-deleted the > > broken ones. Seemed to work without a hitch, manual removal was > > only necessary to remove the IPs from DNS\_msdcs.ourdomain\gc\. > >

On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 19:14:19 +0200 Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi there > > I have migrated from an older version of Samba DC to Samba 4.9.4 AD. > Running Centos 7. One server with everything on...  (AD and file > server) Bind 9.9.4 > > Built from source. > Followed directions in the wiki. > All seems to go fine, but when I startup

On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:43:43 +0200 Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 2019/02/14 21:12, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 19:14:19 +0200 > > Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi there > >> > >> I have migrated from an older version of Samba DC to Samba 4.9.4 >

On 2019/02/14 21:12, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 19:14:19 +0200 > Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi there >> >> I have migrated from an older version of Samba DC to Samba 4.9.4 AD. >> Running Centos 7. One server with everything on...  (AD and file >> server) Bind 9.9.4 >> >> Built from

Hi there I have migrated from an older version of Samba DC to Samba 4.9.4 AD. Running Centos 7. One server with everything on...  (AD and file server) Bind 9.9.4 Built from source. Followed directions in the wiki. All seems to go fine, but when I startup samba-ad-dc it shows a few errors.    ([kdc failed to setup interfaces]) The initial tests (in the directions in wiki) go fine until I get to 

Well, let's try to be more precise about my issue and give some updates: I try to make a classicupgrade and meanwhile, change the Domain name during the process, which includes realm and NetBIOS domain name. I precisely meet difficulties with changing the NetBIOS domain name. What i've tried so far: 1) Change the NetBIOS domain name "workgroup" attribute on the old Samba 3