similar to: User authentication log

Dear, I am having the following issue Logs generated by "realpath" enabled UPnP. How could I fix it? Samba File: / Etc / samba / smb.conf vfs objects = full_audit full_audit: success = pwrite, rename, rmdir, unlink full_audit: prefix =% u |% m |% I |% O full_audit: failure = none full_audit: facility = local7 full_audit: priority = notice

Hello, I run samba 3.6 and I need to track problems for dedicated users. So I thought, I load at the end via include special configurations for the user separately. My question is, how does the smbd configure itself. Does smbd 1) reads the config completely and then it set the parameters in the process or 2) does smbd reads and set each parameter instantly? So can I use the following example?

Hi Rowland, Thanks for taking the time to look at this. I will post the log 10 output a bit later. Btw, what logs with log level 10 are you interested in? Here’s my samba config with sensitive info replaced with placeholders: [global] access based share enum = yes browseable = yes comment = <COMMENT> create mask = 0660 directory mask =

> Hello- > > I upgraded Samba from 4.6 to 4.8 on a FreeBSD 11.2 server. After the > upgrade, users cannot access the HOME folder share but they can access > other shares just fine. > > I am using the RID backend on this member server that connects to Windows- > based domain controllers. I apologize for the lengthy smb4.conf but here > it is: > [ ...snip... ] >

Besides this change on vfs objects, i delete winbindd_idmap.tdb and restarted winbind. Change smb.conf: vfs objects = acl_xattr full_audit full_audit:facility = LOCAL7 full_audit:priority = NOTICE full_audit:prefix = %u|%I|%m|%S full_audit:success = pread pwrite rename rmdir mkdir unlink chown full_audit:failure = none Here are my configurations: #

On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 13:57:26 -0600 Sergei Gerasenko <gerases at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for taking the time to look at this. I will post the log 10 > output a bit later. Btw, what logs with log level 10 are you > interested in? > > Here’s my samba config with sensitive info replaced with placeholders: > > [global] > access based share enum

Unfortunately logs files are generated in /var/log/samba but they are all empty, do you know the reason ? My smb.conf : [global] log level = 1 auth_audit:3 vfs:2 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%U.%m max log size = 1000 logging = syslog [Share] vfs objects = full_audit full_audit:prefix = %u|%I|%m|%P|%S full_audit:success = connect disconnect full_audit:success = mkdir rename unlink rmdir pwrite

Dear, I am having the following issue Logs generated by "realpath" enabled UPnP. How could I fix it? Samba File: / Etc / samba / smb.conf vfs objects = full_audit full_audit: success = pwrite, rename, rmdir, unlink full_audit: prefix =% u |% m |% I |% O full_audit: failure = none full_audit: facility = local7 full_audit: priority = notice

On 01/09/15 12:04, Mario Pio Russo wrote: > > Good day All > > I am re proposing this topic as it keeps happening in our enviroment and is > creating some trouble now. > > I have 1 samba file share server, and a different samba4 AD server. > > the file server has been recently updated to Ubuntu 14 and its native samba > 4.1.6. The samba4 AD is on Ubuntu 14 and on

Hello Experts, I am trying to migrate a Samba 3.6 server to Samba 4.19. The OS of the old server is FreeBSD 10.3 and the new one is FreeBSD 14.1. The client computers are Win 10 Pro. Simple Samba configuration, no need for Active Directory, just a file server with user authentication. On the Windows computer I try to mount the shares from the new server as \\[new server IP address]. The log

On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:20:44 -0400 samba3to4 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello Experts, > > I am trying to migrate a Samba 3.6 server to Samba 4.19. > > [...] > > The log file shows that the user can authenticate: > > [2024/10/07 23:27:24.974539, 2] ../../source3/auth/auth.c: > 338(auth_check_ntlm_password) check_ntlm_password:

Hi all, I'm running a small (50 users) AD with an AD-DC and a Domain Member as the file server. Both running debian Stretch and self-compiled samba 4.6.12. Bind as DNS. Multiple shares configured using windows ACLs. All work as expected except for User Home Folders (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_Home_Folders). I've created a folder for each user under samba_homes/ and gave full

Hello- I upgraded Samba from 4.6 to 4.8 on a FreeBSD 11.2 server. After the upgrade, users cannot access the HOME folder share but they can access other shares just fine. I am using the RID backend on this member server that connects to Windows-based domain controllers. I apologize for the lengthy smb4.conf but here it is: #======================= Global Settings

Hello All, now that the BUG 14343: (s3: vfs_full_audit: Add missing fcntl entry in vfs_op_names[] array.) was fixed I wanted to try 4.12 again. This is the relevant config which has been running for years: vfs objects = acl_xattr full_audit shadow_copy2 full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = pwrite write rename unlink full_audit:prefix = IP=%I|USER=%u|MACHINE=%m|VOLUME=%S

Good morning list, is there a failure in that manpage? (I'm running Samba version 4.17.6-Debian) The example shows: [records] path = /data/records vfs objects = full_audit full_audit:prefix = %u|%I full_audit:success = open opendir full_audit:failure = all !open full_audit:facility = LOCAL7 full_audit:priority = ALERT But: - opendir is not shown within complete set of Samba VFS operations.

Hello, After upgrading from Debian Etch with samba 3.0.24-6etch10 to Lenny with a backport of 2:3.4.5~dfsg-1 (with libtalloc2 2.0.1-1), i get a fully working service but with a strange ACL bug : people can create/delete/rename files, but not modify them (error "espace insuffisant pour traiter cette commande" in french, which should translate into "Not enough storage is

Great thanks, I'll test your config files now! some questions before: > I would also recommend Installing the 'acl' & 'attr' packages (if not already installed), those are installed and at the latest version on the file share server, are they needed on the AD too (I would think no)? > read up on using POSIX ACLs and lose the 'force' lines in the member

Hello, I am running a Samba 4 DC, recently upgraded to the latest version and I have just installed a member server to run as a File Server (Samba 4.1.9). While it seems to be working properly, we are getting a lot of zombie nmbd processes on the member server, running the command *pidof nmbd* results in: *[root at BHFS01 etc]# pidof nmbd* *12861 12644 12404 12236 12071 11885 11720 11553 11388

Hi list, we have spotted a serious problem with our Samba (Debian version 3.0.24-6) on linux 2.4.31, ext2 with ACLs enabled. We use "hide unreadable = yes" to reduce clutter for our users. Today we noticed that with this option enabled any linux client can access and read *all* directories under the share, even directories that are owned by root and set to 0700. No ACLs are set on the

Hi, first of all i'm sorry for my english. i'm using sernet packages to keep updated my file server, but after the latest update it becames very slow listing and accesing to files... For example, a thunderbird profile from networks takes about 1 minute to load. Now the profile takes about 20 minutes and the program still loading... I've not changed any configuration on server and i