similar to: Grant computer account access to share?

Hello Folks, We're using Samba as AD servers along with Windows AD Servers (2008R2 FL). We also use SCCM (Current Branch) that is dependent on AD for lab deployments (Windows 10). Currently, SCCM (current branch) supports 2008R2 FL, but for how long??? Samba does not support 2012R2, 2016, 2019 FL. We'd like to remove the Windows Servers from our AD infrastructure, but would also like

Spike White, Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2014 4:32 AM > > Luke, I have considerable experience with this. We use WDS at work > for PXE (MS-centric shop). I use pxelinux at home. > > I've got WDS working in our test lab w/ UEFI. As you state, it strongly > wishes to do proxyDHCP (port 4011). More on this in a bit. > > It's quite common to segregate the DHCP

Thanks for your email. Yes it does provide some insight into why I could hack a Linux DHCP server into providing enough PXE boot information for PXE 3 clients but PXE 2.1 were happy (ROMs under many circumstances need to use proxy dhcp 4011 - as documented by IBM on the link I shared earlier). It appears only the most latest Dell business systems have EFI 64 support, and the best you can expect

This got me closer, but it got to "Encapsulating winpe.wim..." and never went through the rest of the way. Ultimately PXELINUX apparently timed out and the machine rebooted. Here is relative portion of pxelinux: LABEL SCCM OSD Boot MENU LABEL ^2. SCCM OSD Boot com32 linux.c32 append wimboot initrdfile=bootmgr.exe,BCD,boot.sdi,winpe.wim TEXT HELP

All, On my ubuntu linux machine here, I already have samba set up and configured with winbind to perform authentication against the local windows domain controller. Thankfully that part is all working fine - that was supposed to be the hard part. The issue I have now is: I need to grant members of a certain AD group access to share (this was supposed to be easy, but is not working) sanity check

Hello, I would like to know if there are any resources (success stories, comparisons, blogs...) regarding the use of puppet as a substitute to SCCM in Windows platforms. Would also love to hear success stories from Windows administrators using puppet. I''m somewhat skilled with puppet but not with SCCM, so I don''t even know if the scope of the products is really similar.

I am looking for some way to grant or deny internet access (that is, changing iptables rules) based on Samba domain logon. When a user logs on, I would like to run a script that modifies firewall rules based on the group that the user belongs to (this determines if he has internet access or not) and based on the workstation's IP address (so I know which IP address to grant internet access

Hello i like to give a windows group (W2K3-AD) permissions to use a share read/write on a Samba domain member server. Therefore if have added the Samba server to the domain without problem and created a share like this: [bild] comment = Some Comment path = /data/bild admin users = root force user = smbuser force group = sambashare valid users = DOMAIN\w-user1

G'day All, We are trying to set up SCCM-5.0. Our AD test is Samba-4.8.5. SCCM requires schema changes, and Samba is rejecting these. Anyone tackled this? Ideas on how to proceed? The output thrown by the SCCM exe (extadsch.exe) is: Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager v5.00 (Build 8634) Copyright (C) 2011 Microsoft Corp. Failed to extend the Active Directory schema. Your

Hi all, I've got these permissions set on a folder: $ getfacl htdocs # file: htdocs # owner: root # group: users user::rwx group::rwx group:DOMAIN\134htdocs_access:rwx mask::rwx other::r-x The idea being that any users in the "htdocs_access" group in Active Directory will have full access to this "htdocs" folder, without interfering with the real owner/group of the

> Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 07:07:52 +0000 > From: Luke Ledgerd <luke.ledgerd at niteco.se> > To: "syslinux at zytor.com" <syslinux at zytor.com> > Subject: [syslinux] Chain-loading from WDS to PXELinux on a different > tftp server > Message-ID: <17ba7ad419d54b6cab685c2cedc3de95 at NI-MAILEX.niteco.se> > Content-Type: text/plain;

I was following an email chain in the xen mailing list on HVM hypercalls on grant tables and the email chain link is below http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-03/msg00688.html This link says that we need not required hypercalls to share memory b/w HVM''s. But as far as my understanding of sharing memory is concerned, I think the memory is shared using grant table

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Spike White <spikewhitetx at gmail.com> wrote: > But chain-loading into WinPE would be useful too. > In order to use "wimboot", I have to use ./efi64/com32/modules/pxechn.c32 > to chain-load into ipxe? As so: pxechn.c32 contains BIOS-only code and is not going to work in any EFI environment. > LABEL WinPE > MENU LABEL

Hi, I have a samba server setup as a domain member. I am trying to grant SeDiskOperatorPrivilege to some user accounts e.g. "domainaname\User", but I always get the above error. It doesnot matter what I specify as the server in -S option to the command. The command syntax I use is: net rpc rights grant "username" SeDiskOperatorPrivilege OR net -S ADserver -U

I'm using security = ADS and winbind. I need to grant SePrintOperatorPrivilege to a user in domain. When i try to grant SePrintOperatorPrivilege to my user(realm\lutierib) i use: net -d 1 -Uroot -Slocalhost rpc rights grant realm\lutierib SePrintOperatorPrivilege executing the above command return me a error(Acces denied) because root is not found in domain and doesn't has permittion

I''m experiencing total grant table corruption on a system and I''m hoping my symptoms will ring a bell with a member of the Xen developer community. The setup is Xen 4.0.0-RC2 (OpenSUSE 11.2 package) on a Nehalem system. The sole guest instance is 64bit FreeBSD running in HVM mode, a single vcpu, and a PCI passed-through LSI Logic 1068e SAS controller. FreeBSD is running

Hi, On 10/23/18 7:34 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Control: retitle -1 max grant frames problem (domu freeze with linux-image-4.9.0-4-amd64) > Control: severity -1 important > Control: reassign -1 src:xen 4.8.3+xsa267+shim4.10.1+xsa267-1+deb9u9 my last comment in this bts bug was about:

Hi list, I have managed to grant a specific user access to a sub-folder (sub-level 3 from the share's entry point, I think) on a Samba 4 share he/she is not allowed and not able to access in total/general. I tried 2 different ways with one of them working. I'd like to discuss why that is. For the sake of an example, let's say the share is for teaching material (exam templates,

> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:02:10 +0100 > From: Michael Brown <mcb30 at ipxe.org> > To: Jason Jones <jason.s.jones at convergys.com>, "syslinux at zytor.com" > <syslinux at zytor.com> > Subject: Re: [syslinux] PXE booting WinPE with UEFI architecture > Message-ID: <54006BC2.3090703 at ipxe.org> > Content-Type: text/plain;

RE: "net rpc rights grant testpc1 SePrintOperatorPrivilege -U testpc1" Failed to grant privileges for testpc1 (NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) samba_source_3.3.7 on redhat 5 64bit. I have root on the samba server but I don't have admin access to active directory (hence the auth using testpc1). Does the user granting access need some sort of admin privilege in Active Directory? How do