similar to: Samba browsing not possible! (Linux Mint, Firewall (Gufw), Samba shares, gvfsd-smb-browse)

Hello dear Sambausers: My setup: ========= 0. Linux Mint 11 (Gnome, Nautilus file browser, Firewall "Gufw") 1. Gufw is enabled, rejecting incoming and outgoing traffic by default. 2. I have set all ports relevant to samba (135,139,445/tcp for smbd and 137,138/udp for nmbd) to "Allow", both, for incoming and outgoing. My problem: =========== When I click on "Network>

Hai, Not everyone understand iptables that good Reindl. Ufw can be handy and its usable, now gufw thats the problem here. Gufw added the profile and sadly i dont know anything about gufw, execpt thats a gui on ufw. I dont know the modifications Gufw made on ufw, exacpt i noticed the profiles. Now martin, ok, great. You removed ufw ang gufw. The output looks good. All tables are cleaned up.

Louis, Followed your instructions so far. Take a look at the output of the various steps. I'm down to removing items form /etc/ufw. I'm not sure what I should delete. I know some of the files are backups generated after some rules were deleted. Please tell me what is safe to delete before I procede further. martin at radio:~$ sudo apt-get remove --purge ufw gufw Reading package

On 25/11/2014, isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> wrote: > We recently started upgrading users' workstations to CentOS6. Now > we've come across an interesting issue: > ~user/.local/share/gvfs-metadata is filling up with tons of files. > Once there are around 69270 of them, no more are being created, and > the NetApp filer the user's home is on logs: > > Directory

We recently started upgrading users' workstations to CentOS6. Now we've come across an interesting issue: ~user/.local/share/gvfs-metadata is filling up with tons of files. Once there are around 69270 of them, no more are being created, and the NetApp filer the user's home is on logs: Directory ..../user/.local/share/gvfs-metadata/ reached the maxdirsize limit. Reduce the number of

> Nice to know I'm not the only one that tries to use system facilities > the way they were intended to work and has problems. Maybe if you touch > the bug report so they know I'm not the only one the folks will look and > elevate to RH bug just like they used to do? I was surprised that > "crash" didn't get any attention. While only vaguely related to this

Am 12.02.19 um 09:02 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Not everyone understand iptables that good Reindl i switched 1 years ago to Linux and wrote my first "iptables.sh" on day one which got improved over the years, so it#s not rocket science to learn > Ufw can be handy and its usable, now gufw thats the problem here. > Gufw added the profile and sadly i dont know anything

I am still trying without much success to get a desktop on my minimal + virtualization install of a CentOS-6.3 kvm host. When I run startx I get a desktop but other than the icons for computer, home and trash there is nothing displayed. I can right click the mouse and from there I can open a terminal window and creat a folder on the desktop but I have no title bar and no status bar. There are

Thanks Daniel for helping with this :) # cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/root / ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0 devtmpfs /dev devtmpfs rw,relatime,size=1970508k,nr_inodes=492627,mode=755 0 0 proc /proc proc rw,relatime 0 0 sysfs /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0 tmpfs /run tmpfs rw,relatime,mode=755 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0 fusectl

Rowland, Did some editing in smb.conf that I had to reverse. Now I'm back to being able to connect with the firewall disabled. When I enable the firewall I get as far as windows network -> workgroup but no connection. I have only the rules you recommended in your last email. Louis, The information you requested is below: martin at radio:~$ dpkg -l|egrep "iptables|ufw" ii 

Hi, What determines the protocol version that libsmbclient uses? Changing min and max protocol version in the client smb.conf seems to have no effect. I'm chasing up the performance issues I posted about earlier which may be caused by my Linux clients defaulting to SMB1 (via gvfsd-smb) while Windows happily negotiates SMB2 with the servers. If I restrict the servers to SMB2, gvfs can't

On 10/14/2015 01:56 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > lsof /dev/log Uhmm ... that is not what I expect: lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfsd-fuse file system /run/user/1000/gvfs Output information may be incomplete. COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME systemd 1 root 27u unix 0xffff880250ea0f00 0t0 1436 /dev/log systemd-j 263 root 5u

Hi All, My Samba server/firewall has three (two real, one virtual) network cards: eth0.5: connects to a terminal server eth0: internal network with about 10 XP workstations eth1: the Internet Samba is set to talk to only 12.0.0.1, eth0.5 and eth0. I have my firewall iptables rules set so that users on eth0.5 can only use the samba server on my server. They can not share with any other user on

Hi, I'n using the nautilus file browser in a GNOME desktop environment on a FC2 system. If I enter smb:/// in the location bar in nautilus I can see the network but whenever I try to look at the shares on a computer I get a message saying that I do not have permissions to view the contents. I looked in the archives and found a thread on a similar problem. This thread mentioned that

I'm setting up a VPN, and am trying to figure out how to handle browsing the network through the firewall, under Windows NT. I can mount individual shares fine, if I enter things in manually, but I cannot see the various shares availabe under Network Neighborhood. Reading the various manual pages and smb.conf lead me to believe that it is absolutely possible to use Samba to somehow proxy the

Don't forget to add the #PRE after the host info; that way it preloads it. Create one lmhosts file for the Win boxes, and copy to either \windows (win9x) \winnt\system32\drivers\etc (NT/Win2k/XP) then open a DOS Prompt and type nbtstat -R to flush/refresh the cached info. The samba box's hosts go in /etc, /lmhosts go in /etc/samba (if you're using the current defaults. Put the

Hello.I joined my Linux into Windows Domain and apply some permissions to directories. It is worked very nice in Linux and Windows via SSH and not worked via "Nautilus" or "Windows Explorer". When I use "Nautilus" it ask me the username and password and repeat it.How can I solve it?Any special options about it? Thank you.

On 10/14/2015 07:09 AM, C.L. Martinez wrote: > Uhmm ... that is not what I expect: > > lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfsd-fuse file system > /run/user/1000/gvfs > Output information may be incomplete. > COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME > systemd 1 root 27u unix 0xffff880250ea0f00 0t0 1436 /dev/log > systemd-j

Hello. I'm using Archlinux Mate with its testing repositories activated. I am only the owner of an ISP "box" with an embedded HDD working only with SMBv1 protocol. After I updated my archlinux box to Samba 4.12.0, I noticed that my access was rejected. I tweaked my /etc/samba/smb.conf to add this in [global] section. "server min protocol = CORE client min protocol =

Jason, the best way to help you is with info. If you provide any info as Rowland Penny is saying then maybe we can help you. Anyway i had that problem with a member server after join the AD and was fixed after the first reboot. Actually still working. Greetings. El 4/5/2015 12:42 p. m., "Jason Long" <hack3rcon at yahoo.com> escribi?: > Hello Expert.Any idea to Solve my