similar to: Samba 3.5.6 - malformed datagram

Hi, after quite some testing I do now have my Samba4 setup in production use. The setup mainly consists of an AD-Controller and an AD Member Server which provides file shares to about 20 Windows 7 clients. Everything is working well so far except for two somewhat 'special' clients. For these I observe the following: 1) On the AD Member Server periodically (every hour) appears a message in

Dear list, I have Debian Etch with Samba Version 3.0.24 configured as a PDC. Every day I get exactly 9 emails with panic action: > The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action, > was called for PID 4170 (). > > This means there was a problem with the program, such as a segfault. > However, the executable could not be found for process 4170. > It

I am having trouble with one of my samba PDC's. It does not recognize itself as the domain master browser even though it is set to be so. I can not add machines to this domain and I suspect this is why. Has anybody seen this or know what causes it? Notice this: DOMAIN_ALBANY(3) current master browser = ALBANY_PDC DOMAIN_NYC(2) current master browser = NYC_PDC

I had a problem similar to my current one a week or so ago, and I was encouraged to upgrade from Samba 2.2.9 to 3.0.7, which I did. Now that I've completed that nightmare, the problem I initially set out to fix is still there, just different. Namely: I am trying to set up Samba 3.0.7 on a SuSE 9.1 box as an LDAP PDC whose only job will be authentication. Our LDAP server is on a separate

Hi everyone. I just got a copy of Win2k in and have been messing with it. Have a question, and have searched the archives for the answer, but didn't find it. Can Win2k domain logon to a pre-3.0.0 samba server? Or di I need to get TNG running? I can get NT4.0 boxes to authenticate and login fine (Samba pre-3.0.0), but Win2k keeps complaining: "The following error occurred validating

Aug 6 11:21:44 linux nmbd[2193]: [2014/08/06 11:21:44.614859, 0] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1174(process_lanman_packet) Aug 6 11:21:44 linux nmbd[2193]: process_lanman_packet: Discarding datagram from IP 192.168.1.6. Source name LINUX<00> is one of our names ! Aug 6 11:22:50 linux nmbd[2193]: [2014/08/06 11:22:50.279516, 0]

Hi I have a bunch of FreeNAS servers and a TrueNAS HA server all spamming the logs with these messages every minute about their own source name (examples below). These boxes are on two physically separate networks, and I find it unlikely both networks should have some sort of undetected loop. Any ideas on how to debug this? Samba version is 4.1.18. FreeNAS box on network A " Jan 5

Hi all, We have a weird problem, Samba is providing an outdated IP address for a client (XP Pro) machine. This means that the client machine is not contactable by the other machines on the network. The IP is that which was previously used when connecting via the company VPN, although the machine has/is now plugged onto the company network and had has new IP via DHCP. This problem continues

There appears to be a problem with sending 0-length (UDP) datagrams. I have a little UDP server running on port 1392, and when I execute the following client code the server does not receive anything. However if I change it to data="x", the server receives it just fine. EM::run { conn = EM::open_datagram_socket( "", 0 ) data = "" puts

Hi team, I'm dealing with AS/U as a member server on a Samba 3.0.20 PDC. Jonction seems ok, and from the member server I can see PDC's shares (with net view) and authenticate user (with net logon user passwd /domain:domainname). On the other side, I fell into timeout when running smbclient -L member from the PDC. Here is a log.nmbd loglevel 10 from PDC as there is no other log

On 01/06/2016 01:23 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> Jan 5 23:17:32 storage4 nmbd[34068]: [2016/01/05 23:17:32.086480, >> 0] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1174(process_lanman_packet) >> Jan 5 23:17:32 storage4 nmbd[34068]: process_lanman_packet: >> Discarding datagram from IP 172.21.140.17. Source name STORAGE4<00> >> is one of our names ! >> " >

New api xfs_growfs for expanding a XFS filesystem. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/xfs.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/generator_actions.ml | 15 ++++++ gobject/Makefile.inc | 6 ++- po/POTFILES | 1 + src/MAX_PROC_NR | 2 +- 5 files changed, 140

Hi all, I've been playing around with the Windows 7 Beta to see if it's viable for our company and I've been testing it with samba. I've been able to browse shares via \\server\sharename without a problem but I'm unable to get it to connect to the samba pdc (which currently works fine with XP / Vista). The error is "The following error occurred attempting to join the

Hello All, I''ve seen this topic but it seems no one has post a response. I''m using periodicalUpdater to display live content queried from a database. Sometimes the result can be thousands of rows and before it finishes processing (displaying as a visual indicator) all the data, the next request is sent to the server. I''d like to have a periodicalUpdater whose

Hello, FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p3 #3 $top ... PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 36032 root 2838 44 0 1917M 1493M ucond 0 406:39 3.03% CGServer ... $cat /boot/loader.conf.local ... kern.maxdsiz="1073741824" kern.maxssiz="134217728" kern.dfldsiz="1073741824" $limits Resource limits (current): ... datasize

Hello, I'm having a problem logging in to the Samba domain from an XP machine. The machine is added to the domain but after reboot I can't login. I've done the signorseal registry hack but I'm still not able to login. The error I get when logging in is this: "Windows cannot connect to the domain, either because the domain controller is down or otherwise unavailable, or

I was trying to run the simplify CFG Pass in LLVM , and delete an unreachable basic block ("continuation" below ) after running one of my own IR transforms , but I keep getting the error - While deleting: i8* %g Use still stuck around after Def is destroyed: store i8 0, i8* %g I am well aware of what that means, but isn't the whole purpose of the "simplifyCFGPass" to

Hello All, I have recently switched back over from using the MySQL backend to the standard smbpasswd file in an effort to make our implementation of Samba better.\ I am still having a great problem with getting messages from the nmbd daemon saying that ------------------------ [2005/09/10 14:53:43, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_browse_packet(1050) process_browse_packet: Discarding

Ensure that the size filled in by userland in the datagram header matches the size of the buffer passed down in the IOCTL. Note that we account for the size of the header itself in the check. Acked-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com> Acked-by: Aditya Sarwade <asarwade at vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Andy King <acking at vmware.com> Reported-by: David Ramos <daramos at

Ensure that the size filled in by userland in the datagram header matches the size of the buffer passed down in the IOCTL. Note that we account for the size of the header itself in the check. Acked-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com> Acked-by: Aditya Sarwade <asarwade at vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Andy King <acking at vmware.com> Reported-by: David Ramos <daramos at