similar to: XP is unable to write to samba shares - Valid users?

On 1/08/2016 10:01 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 7/31/2016 om 4:27 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: >> Hi, >> >> I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two >> hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. >> Has anyone else experienced the replication problem? Are sieve >> scripts actually replicating in live time for

Dear All. I have a file server. I installed the samba on it to store the document. See below for the security : - group : + g1 : user1, user2,user3 + g2 : user4, user5,user6 + g3 : user1,user5 - folder : + folder A : set permission chmod 775 and group chown root:g3 The problem is when the user1 modified a file in folder A then that file add the group g1 automatically. So

Hi, no, that's my fault. I changed the UIDs and user names in my "ls -l" to unpersonalized/example data for my mail and didn't think about putting these values into the range. A better unpersonalized data example would look like: ---------- drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\group  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\group  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2

Ok, you are completely right. Here are the real numbers with changed user names: drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2 drwx------ 92 DOM\user3        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan 16 08:39 user3 drwx------   3        133265        DOM\domain-user   4096 Sep  7 2015 user4 drwx------   7       

Hi, we are running a file server as member server of a windows 2012 domain. Now we are facing the problem, that some UIDs are not mapped to the user names by the running winbindd process. This results in "nobody" usernames for nfs shares mounted by other clients. When doing an "ls -l" in the homes directory on the member server (file server), the list looks like:

Hello all, I could not find anything in the discussion groups or documentation about using LDAP and Unix group mappings. The documentation states that in order to map unix groups to samba groups, you need to use the net group add command. However, I have an ldap backend and all my groups, that I care about are in LDAP. So I have a group called mainwdev. dn:

Hi everybody, I'm new to this mailing list, i need help about a configuration with Samba / Openldap. I have a samba server with shared folders, where users authenticate with a determined login/password. I would like to use my directory (openldap) to authenticate my users to access the shared folders. I do not want to use samba as a domain controller, just to authenticate the users with

Hello there! I've migrated our courier-imap production imap/pop server to dovecot 1.0-beta few days ago. In general dovecot performs excellent, but i've encountered several "bugs" in dovecot log: --- snip --- dovecot.log.1.gz:Feb 24 16:05:21 elfstone dovecot: imap(user3 at domain.tld): Maildir /export/mail/domain.tld/user3 sync: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox (47681

I tried searching through the archives, but was unable to find anything about this. Everything regarding windbind and AD membership is working perfectly with one exception. Here's an example of what I'm experiencing: A group called "department_users" contains two groups "department_faculty" and "department_staff". These two groups,

Hello, I have a question about mapping users home directory's to samba. The homedir layout is based on an old one used on NIS+ system. The structure is something like: /users /group1 /user1 /user2 ... /group2 /user3 ...

Hi all, I'm on FreeBSD11 and I install samba36. I have some users and groups. user1, user2 -> group1 user3->group3 user4,user5->group4 I have a share: /extra/samba-test Access to the share is : user1->writable user4->readable group4->writable group3->writable My config file is: [samba-share] comment= aa path= /extra/samba-test public= no browsable= yes writable=no

Hi, I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. In short, I have two hosts which replicate in a master-master type setup where almost all of the reads and writes happen to just one of the two hosts. They are both running 2.2.devel (9dc6403), which is close to the latest 2.2 -git . Pigeonhole is running

_________________________________________________________________ http://redirect.gimas.net/?n=M0906xWLM2009 Neu: Messenger 2009! Hier kostenlos downloaden!

Hi, I have a data set: > Dataset X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15 X16 X17 1 user1 m 22 19 28 24 12 18 9 7 4 5 4 7 5 7 9 2 user2 f 25 19 23 18 18 15 6 8 6 6 7 10 7 7 7 3 user3 f 28 21 24 18 15 12 10 6 7 9 5 10 5 9 5 4 user4 f 26 19 26 21 12 18 6 6 5 1 3 8 6 5 6 5 user5 m 21 22 26 18 9 6 4 6 1

Am 16.01.2018 um 17:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:54:17 +0100 > Andreas Hauffe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Ok, you are completely right. Here are the real numbers with changed >> user names: >> >> drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 10 08:00 >> user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2       

I have a very small problem. Thanks for any suggestions. Say user1 logs onto a Windows XP workstation and opens file1. Then, if user2 attempts to open the file from another workstation the following message is displayed: "file1 is locked for editing by ''" Problem: *user1* is not displayed between the single quotes. However, say user1 logs onto a Win98 workstation and

Hi Mike, Is the value of the 'doveadm_port' if I am choosing: mail_replica = tcp:server1.domain.ltd no ? I might be wrong too ;) Thx Le mardi 24 janvier 2017 ? 11:41:28, vous ?criviez : > Hello, > I might be wrong, but the port which will be used for the replicator > port is the value of 'doveadm_port' which in your case is 4711. > Mike; > On 01/23/2017

Peter and Jason, thanks for your replies on this. I was able to accomplish this with a combination of Peter's solution and setting "AuthorizedKeysFile none" as suggested in the Stack Overflow question. On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 2:30 PM Peter Moody <mindrot at hda3.com> wrote: > > why aren't the authorized keys/principals commands sufficient? > > $ getent group

Dovecot version 2.1.7 Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS Kernel 3.2.0-35-generic x86_64 I'm not sure exactly when this started occurring, but sporatically users report issues receiving email, having email saved to "Sent," etc. Looking in dovecot.log, I see the following errors: 2013-10-16 09:53:20 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<user1>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=27434,

Hi, I am beginning to see many entries like: Sep 10 21:32:06 mail1 dovecot: imap(user1 at example1.com): Warning: read(/var/run/dovecot/dict): dict lookup took 20 seconds Sep 10 21:32:11 mail1 dovecot: imap(user2 at example2.com): Warning: read(/var/run/dovecot/dict): dict lookup took 25 seconds Sep 10 21:32:16 mail1 dovecot: imap(user3 at example3.com): Warning: read(/var/run/dovecot/dict):