similar to: difference between '%u' and '%U'?

Linda Walsh <flac at tlinx.org> wrote: ... > That brings up another question then... What is 'hi' (v. low?)... Zero, or close to zero, is low. 12 is high. ... > What's a subset stream? This is explained at: http://flac.sourceforge.net/format.html in the bulleted point beginning, "FLAC specifies a subset of itself as the Subset format." ... > Another

Emmanuel Florac via samba wrote: > Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind enumerate users" > Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind enumerate users" > Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind enumerate groups" > Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind enumerate groups" It may be irrelevant, but I have: winbind enum groups = Yes winbind enum users

Emmanuel Florac wrote: > id TESTAD\\testuser > returns "no such user" and > > getent passwd TESTAD\\testuser > > returns a "2" code. > ---- On linux, to get 'domain\user' to resolve, I had to have those entries in my /etc/passwd (and /etc/group for groups). I.e. *w/o krb*, (in samba 3.x), I had entries like:

Was there some reason that patch got dropped? Otherwise rsync eats up all the buffer memory. Note -- I tried directio -- didn't work due to alignment issues -- buffers have to be aligned to sectors. The kernel, if I remember correctly, has been on again/off again on requiring alignment on directio -- because most of the drivers and devices do for directio to work, at. "dd"

Hi We are building a Linux app under Centos 5.3, using gnu make 3.81 and gcc 4.12. The working directory is on a remote machine and is either a Samba share or a Windows 7 share. We find that in the case of a Windows 7 share the resulting executable has the sticky bit set in group: On Windows 7 share: -rwxrwSrwx 1 <snip> myapp On Samba share: -rwxrwx--x+ 1 <snip> myapp The

I'm trying to find out what's causing this slowdown -- it's INTOLERABLE.... over 1 minute and less than 1% done. (400MB file)... After trying 3 times, I gave up and logged in using X to the server and ran Tbird from there.... Mail sent out in < 1 minute, though the copy to dovecot took about 50% longer. So... I looked at the network trace. and everyfrackin' body was

Familiar? protocol error on a local file copy? How can I have a proto incompat when it it is talking to itself?... This was on the ERROUT... rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes to socket [sender]: Broken pipe (32) File-list index 531530 not in 531937 - 533437 (finish_hard_link) [generator] rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at rsync.c(652) [generator=3.0.9] rsync:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 Summary: Slow Performance over Network rsync Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: Joerg.Grube at Gmx.De

Yves Goergen wrote: > The issue still exists. Can anybody explain to me why dovecot creates > IMAP folders with the wrong filesystem permissions? On a lark, I looked through my dirs @ permissions. Shorted lines a bit so they'd fit w/o extra lines between them using: (get rid of text before permissions, and shorten user/group to a few letter) find . -type d -ls|sed -r

In the smb.conf manpage, there is a notation used, (G) or (S) for global or share. Does (S) mean it can only be used in a Share section (i.e. - will be ignored in the global section), or is that they *can* be applied at the share level, and, possibly set a default in the 'G'lobal section? example: "ea support = yes" Seems like that could mean that extended attrs are

Hello to all, After a lot of trying this is the solution for all with samba 3.2.15 installed. My Windows 7 client machine joins the domain on the fly with this registry hack. I can logon without errors and all my netlogon scripts are working: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanWorkstation\Para meters] "DomainCompatibilityMode"=dword:00000001

Why would the samba list be looking for a reverse host name via IPV6? IFAIK I only have an IPv4 addr and reverse addr. I don't know if the original went to the person in france or not. Anyone else getting bounces like this? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 13:19:19 -0700 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem

I have an uninstalled portable Windows .exe. When I type the absolute path, it doesn't work: > wine /home/ubuntu/appDir/myApp.exe but, if I cd to the application directory and execute it locally, it works: Code: cd /home/ubuntu/appDir/ wine myApp.exe I'm trying to include it in my Docky dock via a .desktop shortcut I've made in /usr/share/applications/. I don't mind

Among various problems since I upgraded to 3.6 (none of which got answered really, -- so I backgraded to 3.5.10 and started debugging from there, considering 3.6.0 too unstable/too incompatible for 'whatever' reason... One of the probs I had was 'root' couldn't use "net rpc" <anything> -- kept getting auth failures. Wasn't the passwd, -- could reset it via

Hi! I have a problem involving Samba4, exim4, fetchmail, dovecot and PAM... I have setup a "maildrop" machine, which fetches mail from an external POP3 server for multiple accounts and then serves them locally via IMAP. On the same machine, I am currently running Samba 4.0.9 over Debian Wheezy. The idea is that fetchmail gets the mail, passes it to exim4, gets delivered to the "AD

FYI, the same bug apears if one mounts the file system using "cifs": -rwxr----- 1 user 2532415 2000-04-02 00:34:50.000000000 -0800 fo1.mp3* -rwxr----- 1 user 3876671 2000-03-12 21:33:20.000000000 -0800 fo2.mp3* Linda W wrote: > Summary: > There appears to be a bug in the "time range" Samba is using on > dates where time is scheduled to "Spring Forward"

Rebooted my system for a windows update. When it came back up, It said the trust between my workstation and DC was broken. (Running Windows 7x64 SP1). Very odd, haven't seen that for a while. I thought it would be easy: unjoin/rejoin. But upon trying to rejoin, I get: The join operation was not successful. This could be because an existing computer account having name 'ANY'

I hope this is the right list, as I'm desiring a feature addition in openssh. I would like the option to have a 'null' cipher (after the initial authorization, similar to 'delayed' for compression). It would have to be enabled on both client and server and server would never use it unless it was both enabled and asked for by the client. I'd strongly prefer it be able to

On 10 November 2016 at 15:37, Linda W <samba at tlinx.org> wrote: > Erick Ocrospoma via samba wrote: > >> On 10 November 2016 at 07:51, Vinicius Bones Silva via samba < >> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >> >> >>> PROBABLY its a problem with your reverse dns resolution. >>> >>> >> ​Hi, >> >> DNS

what does the exhaustive model search do? Does it try all of the functions listed under "-A" to find the 'best', i.e. bartlett, bartlett_hann, blackman, blackman_har- ris_4term_92db, connes, flattop, gauss(STDDEV), hamming, hann, kaiser_bessel, nuttall, rectangle, triangle, tukey(P), welch. Or is that something else? I've been using the -e option for a while in