similar to: a new world | smb2

Hi all, At the moment we are running Debian squeeze with stock samba 3.5.6. and are testing some new samba installations from ubuntu 12.04, centos 6.4 and debian wheezy. All running in a VM on a XenServer. The samba servers are member of a 2008R2 domain, using smb1 protocol all are running fine and we get a constant 90MB/s (big file transfer) on our 1GB network. We would like to enable smb2

Hi forks: I've been testing SMB2 with samba 3.6.4 performance these days, and I find a weird benchmark that SMB2 write performance is slower than SMB1 in 10Gb ethernet network. Server ----------------------- Linux: Redhat Enterprise 6.1 x64 Kernel: 2.6.31 x86_64 Samba: 3.6.4 (almost using the default configuration) Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter RAID: Adaptec 51645 RAID

Hi, I'm using libsmbclient library built from source3 directory of samba-3.6.7. When I connect to a vista/2008 server using this libsmbclient library, communication is happening in SMB1 protocol and NOT in SMB2. Please note that I've enabled SMB2 by adding following line to smb.conf max protocol = SMB2 Does libsmbclient library built from source3 directory of samba-3.6.7 supports SMB2?

I have a classic NT4 domain with the PDC also the wins server. With the recent ransomware problem, we're trying to remove SMB1 and below protocols. However when I do this, the browse list is gone. Hosts can access properly the shares, but they have to know exactly \\machine\share in order to to connect. The same thing from a linux client: smbclient -L {PDC} -m SMB2 Domain=[{MYDOMAIN}]

Hi everyone, I'm having the following situation: I need to migrate all SMB file services to a new appliance that only supports the SMB2+ protocol. Unfortunately, there are still some very old Linux clients ("modinfo cifs" says version 1.60) that do only speak SMB1 and need to access these shares after the migration. Is it possible to have a Linux with a modern Samba

Hello, We are running some legacy software that instructs us to, via Windows registry settings, disable all oplocks and SMB2 entirely on each Windows workstation that connects to the Samba share where the software is hosted. The software maintainers give dire warners of corruption, etc., if oplocks (and SMB2) are left enabled. We?ve run this software off of a Samba share for 20 years and have

On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > unix extensions = no > wide links = yes > > Unfortunately this still does not work for me - can you really make a symbolic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > > > On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > > > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > > > > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > > > > > unix extensions

We have a 10G network with a mix of Windows 10 and MacOS 10.12 machines, and a CentOS 7 machine. Copying large files "fast" from the CentOS machine to Windows, using SMB2 or SMB3 fails almost every time, at the end of the copy. - With SMB1, it seems to work, but is much slower. - Copying to a smb share on a Mac seems to work, but is also much slower. - Using a normal Gigabit network

Hello, i have a Samba Server running on CentOS 5.6 with samba package 3.5.8 from SerNet. Shares can accessed until I enable max protocol = smb2, after that no access is possible. In the samba logfiles such an access is logged with: Failed to parse NTLMSSP packet, could not extract NTLMSSP command Followed by a dump_data. Any ideas? Cheers, Daniel

Andreas, On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:37:07PM +0200, awl1 via samba wrote: > Before I follow your advice to move this whole issue/topic to the > samba-technical alias and start over there with a clean description of the > scenario and the findings, I have two simple questions: > > 1) I plan to use a new, reproducible test scenario with 2000 random small > files with a file length

Hi I've a Windows 2008 R1 connected to a share on a samba 3.5.6 (this samba is a domain member of a samba pdc). All work fine. I've enabled "max protocol = smb2" : i can access the share but when it was impossible to rename a new directory named "New Folder" on the share (created by Windows new folder menu). I've the error : init_smb_request: invalid wct

Hello, This is situation: * [netApps SMB-server] [RHEL-7.1-Client]* | =SMB 2/3= | | sending data>65k Fail | sending data<65k Passes Max Write/Read Size[65535]

Our smbclient 3.6.5 and smbclient 4.0.7 does not work with SMB2/SMB3, which is a security concern for us. Is there a patch or a workaround that can be done for those releases? I've read that Apple made changes in Maverick 10.9, which now causes failures, but am hoping that something was done to support the MAC OS 10.9 releases. Regards, Mike Tompkins

I conducted many tests and I noticed that I lose the domain-join on SMB1 soon as I joined SMB2 in the domain. Step 1: SMB1 "net ads join -Uadministrator" -> OK Step 2: SMB1 "net ads testjoin" -> OK Step 3: SMB2 "net ads join -Uadministrator" -> OK Step 4: SMB2 "net ads testjoin" -> OK Step 5: SMB1 "net ads testjoin" ->

Hi Samba Users, I'm in the process of building a Samba4 CTDB /GPFS Cluster joined as a member server to AD that also supports ACL's . It has taken some time but almost everything is working now :) . My one outstanding issue is editing files using Excel 2007 on Windows 7 results in a 'Document not saved' error. I believe this is an issue with the SMB2 protocol as I can edit the same

hi All, We have a glusterfs cluster with 5 nodes on Ubuntu 12.04 amd64. We use this smb.conf: [global] socket options = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=131072 SO_RCVBUF=131072 read raw = yes server string = %h write raw = yes #oplocks = yes max xmit = 131072 dead time = 15 getwd cache = yes use sendfile=yes block size = 131072 load printers = no aio read size

First off, I'm a little confused but I've been trying to do some research and still have some questions... (please forgive me!) I'm trying to figure out the "best" (ie. fastest) way to connect from Ubuntu to Windows Server 2008. I can use SMB, SMB2, or NFS.

Hello Andrew, many thanks for joining this discussion! :-) Am 18.08.2017 um 21:46 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > I do realise you are in between a rock and a hard place. You have > identified an interesting issue, triggered by a massive protocol change > (so not able to be bisected down to a regression) that requires > significant work to understand and may or not be possible to

I've set up a dfs share according to instructions. There is one part of the instructions that I don't understand. I've checked the forum archives but can't find any examples which might help. In the Instructions section (4.1 of the HTML Samba Project Documentation), is shows how to set up the symbolic links in a DFS share, as shown below. I have 2 Samba servers (SMB1 and SMB2).