similar to: Very slow samba performance on Centos 6

We improved our instruction itineraries and now we're seeing our testcases for fence instructions break. For example, we have this testcase: @write_me = external global i32 @read_me = external global i32 ; Function Attrs: nounwind define i32 @xstg_intrinsic(i32 %foo) #0 { entry: ; CHECK: store r0, r1, 0, 32 ; CHECK-NEXT: fence 2 %foo.addr = alloca i32, align 4 store i32 %foo,

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 22, 2016, at 11:20, Phil Tomson via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > We improved our instruction itineraries and now we're seeing our > testcases for fence instructions break. > > > > For example, we have this testcase: > >

Please CC as I''m not subscribed to valgrind-developers. Under Xen the toolstack is responsible for managing the domains in the system, e.g. creating, destroying, and otherwise manipulating them. To do this it uses a number of ioctls on the /proc/xen/privcmd device. Most of these (the MMAPBATCH ones) simply set things up such that a subsequenct mmap call will map the desired guest

Anyone have any experience with a R510 with the PERC H200/H700 controller with ZFS? My perception is that Dell doesn''t play well with OpenSolaris. Thanks, Geoff

I'm having trouble setting up ldap based authenication. I have a virtual (KVM) CentOS 5.4 box set up to authenticate to a 389 (fedora) directory server, and that works fine. However, I set up a virtual box running CentOS 6, and I can't get it to authenicate. I've run authconfig with the appropriate flags, ldapsearch properly finds the data, but I can't log in. /var/log/secure

We are looking at building a storage platform based on Dell HW + ZFS (likely Nexenta). Going Dell because they can provide solid HW support globally. Are any of you using the MD1200 JBOD with head units *without* an MD3200 in front? We are being told that the MD1200''s won''t "daisy chain" unless the MD3200 is involved. We would be looking to use some sort of

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org > wrote: > On 1/7/2016 3:25 PM, Phil Tomson wrote: > >> >> That's better, but now I get: >> >> XSTGInstrInfo.td:902:3: error: In RelAddr: XSTGRELADDR node requires >> exactly 2 operands! >> >> Which makes some sense as XSTGRELADDR is defined as: >> def

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 1/7/2016 1:55 PM, Phil Tomson via llvm-dev wrote: > >> >> let Uses= [GRP] in { >> def RelAddr : XSTGPseudo< (outs), >> (ins GPRC:$spoff, GPRC:$dst), >>

Hi folks: At work, I have an R510, and R610 and an R710 - all with the H700 PERC controller. Based on experiments, it seems like there is no way to bypass the PERC controller - it seems like one can only access the individual disks if they are set up in RAID0 each. This brings me to ask some questions: a. Is it fine (in terms of an intelligent controller coming in the way of ZFS) to have the

On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 11:50 -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > At Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:03:18 -0400 CentOS mailing list < > centos at centos.org> wrote:HA! You only really need to learn *one* > command: the man command. > The man > provides 'enlightenment' for all other commands: > man vgdisplay > man lvdisplay > man lvcreate > man lvextend > man lvresize

Hi, i have a rather weird and also problematic use case. My NAS provides permissions but I don't know how. The share is mounted using unix extensions and I am seeing user IDs. However my /local/ filesystem refuses me to allow to do anything unless I am root or set the noperms flag (ostensibly). This means that locally write access is denied but not remotely. The local user is UID 1000.

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 09:03:41AM -0800, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > Check out the latest cifsfs code. I think Steve > and Aurelian and Ronnie added an ioctl for this. > > I'm here at Vault in Boston with Steve, I'll ask > him :-). Steve says there are two utilities in Linux, getcifsacl and setcifsacl that use a custom ioctl inside the Linux cifsfs kernel

I hope that everyone is doing well. I'm new to the list and look forward to participating in the community. I've been using Samba for a long time and have always preached the samba gospel. :-) I find myself with a peculiar problem. I have a RHEL6 install running Samba Version 3.5.4-68.el6_0.2 acting a local file server and it is tied into an Active Directory server for the user

hi, I'm having some difficulty understanding the connection between postfix, dovecot and quota. What is the best way to set up quotas? through the file system quota and maildir? Need the dovecot lda working? The postfix needs a patch? I was thinking about setting quotas on file system, then configure Postfix to connect to dovecot-lda. Any suggestion? The system as a whole is composed

Hi all, My server machine is running samba version 4.4.4 on Linux with 'smb encryption = mandatory' option. My client is a Ubuntu 16.10 Linux machine. I am looking for a way to mount the encrypted samba share on the Linux client machine. I noticed that mount.cifs does not support encryption but smbclient does with an -e flag, however it seems to only be usable in a ftp-like interface.

Hello, I sent the following message to the Debian folks. They don't think that the Debian packaging could be responsible for the issue described there. > Well, I'm not completely convinced that we will have very useful input > for you. I don't really see any reason for this to be caused by the > Debian packaging. To check this, why not compile samba from sources,

Thanks for the first reply, Jeremy. What about the (future) implementation of RichACL? Will there be any native Linux Client support along with the SMB2/SMB3 protocol? I know, there is a native implemenation for RichACLs in ext4 FS. Unfortunately, smbcals is not a native Linux ACL Tool and has a very unhandy syntax. I just tested some days ago. ;-) I am looking for a solution that allows the

Does samba server handle multiple smb commands (not necessarily andx commands) within one packet? If a client were to send commands such as 0x2f, 0x32, 0x32 in one packet instead of three separate packets, does samba server handle it i.e. respond to each of the three requests?

Hi all, I have uploaded a source tarball to sourceforge for testing. See the news item in the HTML docs for the changes (or look here: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/flac/flac/doc/html/news.html?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html ) Download here: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/flac/flac-1.0.5_beta1.tar.gz?download The standard test of 'configure &&

On a busy NFS server I've started receiving the following error messages and the system hangs with high load but no work being done. The system is a Dell R510 with 12 x 3TB drives in a RAID-50 configuration. The RAID-50 device is a full disk LVM (no partitions) and one large (36TB) data volume and the system is running CentOS 6.4 fully patched for OS and firmware. Anyone have any hints as