similar to: MacOS X 10.6, symlinks and shadow copies

I am migrating the main file servers at work onto a new storage platform based on GPFS. I am using RHEL 5.6 with the samba3x packages (aka 3.5.4) recompiled to get the vfs_gpfs and tsmsm modules, with a couple of extra patches to vfs_gpfs module to bring it 3.5.8 level. It is running with ctdb against Windows AD 2008 R2 domain controllers with all the idmapping been held in the AD. In order to

I think this is a recurrence of an old bug. Running Samba 3.5.4 with CTDB on GPFS 3.4.0.6 with the vfs_gpfs module using CentOS 5.6. It is a vanilla CentOS RPM's with the vfs_gpfs module a self compiled add on. Running with NFSv4 ACL's. Basically what happens is when a user saves a file in Office 2010 (no Office 2007 to test with) with Windows 7 on the Unix side the permissions on the

I was reviewing the GPFS VFS module this afternoon after I had a request to add Thumbs.db to the hide files option. Now I was under the impression that the GPFS VFS module mapped this through to the Windows attributes on the under lying file system. That is assuming that your GPFS file system is sufficiently recent to support Windows attributes. I did some experimentations with a Terminal

Some empirical testing shows that if I am using the idmap_ad module the template homedir parameter in smb.conf is ignored. I would just like to determine if this is the correct behaviour or if I am doing something wrong. JAB. -- Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk Fife, United Kingdom.

Tried single quotes on Domain Admins in the pam.d file as well as a backslash on the space with no effect. I've found several references that just say "no spaces in group names." Is there really no way to do this? Also, most references I find to using these lines in pam.d say that "sufficient" should work, but I'm finding that users in the named group can then log in

Hello, does this bug still exists: http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/IPyW4fzzpEetiWKnJyfJ ? It seems that I have the same problem, although "store dos attributes" is set (Samba 3.6.18; GPFS 3.5.0-11). Here my share definition: [shared] comment = <comment> path = <path> available = yes

Hi, I'm trying to set up samba share exporting gpfs filesystem and I strugle with setting sharemode to yes. Samba is 3.6.5, gpfs version is 3.2.1-29 (the latest available for 3.2 branch). Everything works fine when sharemode is set to no, but I'd rather insist to switch it to yes. That's what man page says: no - do not propagate sharemodes across all GPFS nodes. This should only be

Hello, I am using the vfs_gpfs samba module to map ACLs through samba. It works fine on files, but directory ACLs are ignored. Ex: getfacl /sb/share/myplace/ file: sb/share/myplace/ owner: root group: root user::rwx user:afrankel:rwx group::--- mask::rwx other::--- When I try to access this folder in Windows, I get permission denied. The same permissions on a files, I can open it / modify it

Hello everyone I have been struggling a lot with Samba and this mailing list is my last hope. I have a windows server 2008 R2 and my aim? is to store the user's roaming profiles to a samba share. I don't want users to be able to login into the linux machines using their windows credentials just to save their roaming profiles on a samba share. To achieve this I followed numerous pages

When a file is created with samba 3.5.x or 3.6.x, it is created effective read-only: ~ # getfacl Microsoft\ Word-Dokument\ \(neu\).docx # file: Microsoft\040Word-Dokument\040(neu).docx # owner: root # group: 11816 user::rwx user:11582:rwx #effective:r-- group::rwx #effective:r-- mask::r-- other::--- The ACL-settings for the parent directory are ok: ~ # getfacl . #

Hello, We're trying to set up a GPFS system with Samba running on top with CTDB managing it. I have snapshots set up to be accessible in every directory as the invisible directory .snap The snapshots are in the following format: /usr/lpp/mmfs/bin/mmcrsnapshot 1MB `TZ=GMT date + at GMT-%Y.%m.%d-%H.%M.%S` ?and look like this from the UNIX level:

hi. i'm building a package using autotools. to propagate the package version number from configure.ac to DESCRIPTION, i'm using a DESCRIPTION.in file. both of these files are "shar"'d below. i need to distribute the DESCRIPTION.in file, as ./configure will need it. but, "R CMD check" wants to look at DESCRIPTION, so i've let that also come into the package

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:23:15PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > On 23.01.15 22:16, Ralph B?hme wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > >>> On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > >>>> I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are

Chuck and Greg, Thanks a lot for your help! I have a much better understanding now of what is happening ?under the hood?. Kind Regards, Jason > On 31 May 2018, at 20:08, Greg Minshall <minshall at acm.org> wrote: > > Jason, > > as Chuck Berry (to whom, *thanks* for 'do {...} while(0)'!) suggested, > using grep, or even grep executed from find, such as >

Dear R Commander experts, I have now had multiple failures in loading R Commander with R version 2.10.1 (most recent one on the CRAN site) on a Mac running OS 10.5 or 10.6. The installation of R Commander seems to proceed normally, but when I try to start up R Commander, it never loads. It appears that it is loading the tcl/tk package that is failing even though I have started up X11 in advance.

Hi all My apologies for dragging up a very old mail from the depths of the rsync archives: http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2008-October/021963.html I'm trying to use Ronnie's patch to get rsync to copy my GPFS NFSv4 ACLs. I'm having trouble building Ronnie's gpfs.c though - it turns out my programming isn't up to a challenge greater than "configure; make"!

On 23.01.15 22:37, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:23:15PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: >> On 23.01.15 22:16, Ralph B?hme wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: >>>>> On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: >>>>>> I

Greg, I see what you mean, but on the other hand, that's not how we think about real numbers working either, and doubles have that behavior generally. It might be possible to put checks in (with a potentially non-trivial overhead cost) to disallow that kind of thing, but again R (and everyone else, I think?) doesn't do so for regular doubles. Also, I would expect the year 1e50 and the

I am not sure if `pipe()` works for this, but if it turns out that it does not, then you can use the processx package, e.g.: > p <- processx::process$new("sed", c("-l", "s/a/x/g"), stdin = "|", stdout = "|") > p$write_input("foobar\n") > p$read_output() [1] "foobxr\n" The `-l` sed flag is to make sed line-buffered,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9466 Summary: GPFS ACLs are not copied by rsync when copying between two GPFS filesystems Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at