similar to: Different permissions displayed in "security" tab and "advanced" tab

Am 2019-08-26 um 16:35 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 26/08/2019 15:20, ? Peter Rindfuss via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a question regarding permissions at the top of a share as seen >> from a Windows 10 client. >> >> We are using Samba 4.10.6-Debian (van Belle) on Debian 10 (Buster) with >> one AD controller and one file server. >>

Greetings list, I just upgraded to samba 3.6.0 trying SMB2. Though Windows 2008 R2 can work with SMB2 shares just fine, I'm unable to access SMB2 shares with mount.cifs or smbclient, even with "-m smb2" specified -- I get this "Unrecognised protocol level smb2", whereas smbclient comes with samba-client-3.6.0-63.1.rpm. So is this supported yet (from client side) or I

When adding a domain user to a samba 3.6 PDC I found that the [homes] share was not created. It turns out there was no home directory specified in /etc/password for this user. Once a linux home directory was added the [homes] share worked, but I would expect this to work anyway since a different path is being used for windows home directories than for the linux users. Is this expected behavior

Hello list, I'm running a samba server in AD domain, with some AD users explicitly mapped into local users by "username map = sambauser.map", which is a text file. Problem is found with explicitly mapped user, I can only access home share by //server/<ADusername>, not //server/homes (using windows explorer). This feels wrong because I also tried those AD users not listed in

Hello list, Accidentally I found that when network is down "smbclient -L localhost -U%" became slow however it still succeeded after like half a minute. This is weird because my Samba server is running inside AD, Q1. How can smbclient authenticate without talking to AD controller? I think in this case smbclient at least tried to (reach AD controller), otherwise shouldn't take it

Hello list, I've got a question from reading Using Samba 3rd, where it puts: ... the final permission is caculated by below filters in the order used by Samba: 1. Apply any DOS attribute mapping options << I take this as either map DOS attributes to execute bits, or store DOS attributes in extended attributes. Correct? 2. Apply the create mask settings 3. Apply the force

Is there an option to the net command to not have it update DNS in AD? We are joining servers using the net ads join command and it's changing our static DNS entries to dynamic ones which then get deleted when AD does its DNS scavenging. It seems that dynamically updating DNS is the default. The command we're running is: net ads join -U adminuser%adminpasswd Thanks - Mike Mike

Hello list, I'm running a samba 3.5.3 CTDB cluster, found the output is different Q1: What does the "0:" mean in pid column? There was no such stuff in non-CTDB smbstatus output. <snip> samba_01:~ # smbstatus -S 2>/dev/null Service pid machine Connected at ------------------------------------------------------- ben 0:21363 samba Mon Oct

Hi All, I wanted to check the state of the ACL evaluation engine in samba. I have configured my linux sles 10, samba version 3.5.1-3.3-2332 with "ea support = yes", "store dos attributes=yes", "vfs objects = acl_xattr" and get lots of error + some failure messages. I attached the results of running the test against both samba as well as native windows 2003 cifs

Hello, I would like to upload windows printer driver to my Samba through the printer "Advanced tab" as described in that doc http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/happy.html#id2582657 but this tab is totally grayed. I can imagine it's a permission issue but I'm not sure at all. Any idea, Frederic

I have a RHL box running Samba 1.19.8p10 (or whatever the latest one is). I would like to share the /home/httpd directory read-only to everyone on the network and read/write to a few specific people. I cannot get the passwords for these people, and I want this to be as transparent as possible (read: as "invisible" as possible). I don't want to have to add every user to the group, but

>Adding a pointer record for the server didn't help either. I am going to test another Windows PC now to see if the problem exists there as well. > >  >BC I just realized that I omitted an important piece of information and that is that I am using a separate EXT4 volume for my shares. I just did a test and it seems that shares on the same volume as sysvol and netlogon funtion as

Hello, I have Samba server running version 3.0.33-3.29.el5_5.1. The Samba server is a member server of a Windows 2003 domain. Winbind provides authentication. We have a physical directory named hr that is shared as "hr" and is accessible to the HR department. A subdirectory of the hr directory named hrshared is shared as "hrshared" and should be accessible to specific users

Hi all. I have Samba 4.2.8 in a Debian Virtual Machine, i have domain, can join a Windows 10 machine to domain, and i have logged with “administrator” domain account in my Windows 10 machine, wih RSAT tools i can create users etc The problem is with a created folder in server. Mkdir /usuarios Smb.conf: # Global parameters [global]         workgroup = PDC         realm = PDC.CASA        

Hi, I have recently upgraded a system with a Samba BDC, PDC and a couple of member servers from 3.2.14 to 3.4.9 (and also tested with 3.5.6). There appears to be some problem with Winbind (we need to run it on all servers as we have a trust relationship to a domain at another office). I have an Idmap range set up in our LDAP database. With 3.2.14, all worked well. The Idmap ou would be

Hello all, I have a Samba 3.5 server running in an AD domain and domain users can access nonpublic shares with their credentials. Good since this is what I want. However accidentally I found that local users (of the server itself) could also access nonpublic shares with their credentials. Is this a bug or Samba works this way, accepting both local and domain users? Is there anyway I can make the

>> I just realized that I omitted an important piece of information and >> that is that I am using a separate EXT4 volume for my shares. I just >> did a test and it seems that shares on the same volume as sysvol and >> netlogon funtion as expected but shares on the second volume have the >> issue.  >> >> I just mounted that second volume with explicit acl

Hi, Is there any reason against making a ctdb connected 2 pc samba cluster also a domain member? After setting the [include = registry] option, one member of the cluster didn't let the users to log in. If I relogin this cluster member to the domain, then the other member starts to refuse users to log in. Did I miss some option that I have to use in this scenario? The name of the servers are

>I think your problem is being caused by the OS not knowing your users >and groups, have a look here: > >https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configuring_Winbindd_on_a_Samba_AD_DC > >But before you do that, UPGRADE your Samba version. I said that there >have been a lot of improvements, one of them is the 'winbind' built >into the 'samba' binary has been replaced

Greetings list, I was looking at the wiki "samba and clustering" and a ctdb.pdf, admittedly both are quite old (2006 or 2007) and I don't know how things change over years, but I just have two questions about LMASTER: < this is from pdf > LMASTER fixed ? LMASTER is based on record key only ? LMASTER knows where the record is stored ? new records are stored on LMASTER Q1.