similar to: tkey-gssapi-credential and bind (Samba4)

UNOFFICIAL Hi, I have a SAMBA4 box (CentOS 6.5, SAMBA 4.1.7) that joined a 2003 domain and I have transferred (not seized) all FSMO roles to the samba box. I demoted the 2003 DC (had to forceremoval). The Samba box now is the sole DC and DNS server on the network. I followed the instructions in https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2014-February/097703.html for repairing the domain

Hello, we have the following problem with a ADDC Sernet 4.7.6-11 on CentOS 7.4. We have two DCs, replication is working fine. We use bind9 as dns-backend. When we do a "samba_dnsupdate --all-names" we get the following messages: ------------------- [root at dc1 ~]# samba_dnsupdate --all-names dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable

Hi, We have an issue where an existing Win 10 client is already part of the domain, however it's DNS entry isn't updated, Is this bug related? https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11520 please see details below Ubuntu: 16.04.01 LTS Samba: Version 4.3.9-Ubuntu Samba Internal DNS 'allow dns updates = nonsecure' is not specified >ipconfig /registerdns Samba-Log: sudo

Hi, I am trying to run samba with bind_dlz (bind-9.9.1 - P1) on a multi-homed network. I have configured the setup as per Samba4 Howto. But when I try to do "samba_dnsupdate --all-names" it fails with error: dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable The kerberos ticket being used by samba_dnsupdate shows follwoing principals: klist -c /tmp/tmp6cxfgY Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/tmp6cxfgY

As the subject says, dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable. I have internet searched for solutions. I have done everything on /wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable/ and I am still getting: At the end of "root at dc01:~# samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names": dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable Failed nsupdate: 1 Failed update of 29

L.P.H. van Belle writes: > check the rights on : > /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab 640 root:bind > /var/lib/samba/private/dns 750 root:bind > /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d 750 root:bind I'm using the internal DNS on both DC's, so I guess bind access rights aren't the issue. Thanks for your answer though :) Regards, Roel > >-----Oorspronkelijk

L.P.H. van Belle writes: > is the time in sync on your servers ? Yes it is. I managed to make it work by specifying the primary DC as nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf of the secondary DC. As soon as I do that, samba_dnsupdate works on the secondary. When I change it back to use the local Samba as resolver, it no longer works. So it is a DNS issue (possibly related to replication

Hi Samba4 joined to server 2003 as a DC with this command: samba-tool domain join samba.example.com DC -Uadministrator --realm=samba.example.com *How to Setup bind 9.7.3 as dns server Instead of windows dns server?* ================================> try this: create dns and named files with provision command copy dns and named files to joind samba config bind and set

I found another reason for this error: dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable After much head scratching it was due to the Apparmour configuration recommended in the WiKi at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_AppArmor_and_SELinux_Integration The section for Apparmor which recommends adding lines to /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.named, I had to change the line: from:

On 7/3/2020 9:31 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > Does 'sudo rm -f /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab' give you any hint > to which is the correct keytab ? > > Rowland > While waiting for your reply, I began checking my BIND9 setup. Having used many of Louis' "sed" strings instructions, one those strings direct "tkey-gssapi-keytab" to use

Hi Marc, I appreciate that you reply, but I got it resolved by following the advice of Mathias. I was aware of the links below, however the first is about using the BIND9_DLZ backend, and at the time I experienced the issue I was using the internal one. Marc & Mathias, The 2nd link that Marc references is about a DC should not use itself for DNS queries is exactly the opposite of your

On 18/11/2020 19:27, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac wrote: > > ?It is /etc/named.conf and /etc/samba/smb.conf > > > # cat /etc/named.conf > > > ??tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; > > > include "/usr/local/samba/bind-dns/named.conf"; > OK, does the /usr/local/samba/bind-dns directory exist ? if it does, is the

Hi everyone, I'm testing with a Samba4 AD network, and I have some problems with DNS on the second DC, with which I could use a bit of your help. I have an AD with two DC's, both Samba 4.2.3. On the first DC, samba_dnsupdate works fine. With stock 4.2.3 I get the error "TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure" but the DNS updates succeed anyway, and after applying

? In my network I have a samba 4.11.4 as Active Directory Domain Controller installed in CentOS 7 (gtmad.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.17). I have recently installed samba 4.13.2 in CentOS 8 (gtmad1.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.18) and following the wiki.samba.org guide I have joined it as a domain controller to my network. ? ? But I have a "dnsupdate_nameupdate_done: Failed DNS update with

I installed two virtual machines with Samba as domain controllers for the same domain. I was struggling with network and DNS configuration initially, maybe my problem is related. DC1 starts up ok, the last line of the log reads STATUS=daemon 'samba' finished starting up and ready to serve connections DC2 starts with plenty of lines [2016/05/15 22:00:32.744910, 0]

On Wed, 2 May 2018 13:54:01 +0200 Stefan Kania via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > we have the following problem with a ADDC Sernet 4.7.6-11 on CentOS > 7.4. We have two DCs, replication is working fine. We use bind9 as > dns-backend. When we do a "samba_dnsupdate --all-names" we get the > following messages: > ------------------- > [root at

Hello! I've got this error dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable when running samba_dnsupdate --verbose With this error dynamic entries stopped working as Type A machines that entered in the field or entry to a new DC. Already tried the step described here https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable But when trying to delete the account used the

I'm having trouble with nsupdates.  I'm getting TKEY is unacceptable. I'm using Fedora 29, with its packages: [root at dc2 kwhite]# rpm -qa | grep samba samba-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-dc-bind-dlz-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-common-4.9.4-1.fc29.noarch samba-libs-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-dc-libs-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-winbind-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-common-libs-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64

I think I'm missing some SRV records... Calling nsupdate for SRV _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._ sites.ForestDnsZones.mydomain.com dc03.mydomain.com 389 (add) Outgoing update query: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: UPDATE, status: NOERROR, id: 0 ;; flags:; ZONE: 0, PREREQ: 0, UPDATE: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; UPDATE SECTION:

I installed a third DC today. Replication works find, but as systemctl status samba-ad-dc showed an error w.r.t. dnsupdate I was running samba_dnsupdate ?verbose. Below is the output. It looks like there are some missing DNS records, but what are potential causes of this error: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable I already checked what?s listed @