similar to: Disk free space, quotas and GPFS

Tried single quotes on Domain Admins in the pam.d file as well as a backslash on the space with no effect. I've found several references that just say "no spaces in group names." Is there really no way to do this? Also, most references I find to using these lines in pam.d say that "sufficient" should work, but I'm finding that users in the named group can then log in

Hello, I am using the vfs_gpfs samba module to map ACLs through samba. It works fine on files, but directory ACLs are ignored. Ex: getfacl /sb/share/myplace/ file: sb/share/myplace/ owner: root group: root user::rwx user:afrankel:rwx group::--- mask::rwx other::--- When I try to access this folder in Windows, I get permission denied. The same permissions on a files, I can open it / modify it

When a file is created with samba 3.5.x or 3.6.x, it is created effective read-only: ~ # getfacl Microsoft\ Word-Dokument\ \(neu\).docx # file: Microsoft\040Word-Dokument\040(neu).docx # owner: root # group: 11816 user::rwx user:11582:rwx #effective:r-- group::rwx #effective:r-- mask::r-- other::--- The ACL-settings for the parent directory are ok: ~ # getfacl . #

Hello All, I'm trying to set up linux ssh/shell authentication on a CentOS_6.2 server running smbd version 3.5.10-114 using winbind/smb/pam. We've done this successfully using the tdb backend but wanted users to get the same UID/GID on every machine. Switched to rid for the backend but users still got a foreign number for UID and their default group was always Domain Users. So I'm

I think this is a recurrence of an old bug. Running Samba 3.5.4 with CTDB on GPFS 3.4.0.6 with the vfs_gpfs module using CentOS 5.6. It is a vanilla CentOS RPM's with the vfs_gpfs module a self compiled add on. Running with NFSv4 ACL's. Basically what happens is when a user saves a file in Office 2010 (no Office 2007 to test with) with Windows 7 on the Unix side the permissions on the

Hi All, I'm having a frustrating time exporting a GPFS Independent Writer AFM fileset through Samba. Native GPFS directories exported through Samba seem to work properly, but when creating an export which points to an AFM IW fileset, I get "Access Denied" errors when trying to create files from an SMB client and even more unusual "Failed to enumerate objects in the container:

Hello, We're trying to set up a GPFS system with Samba running on top with CTDB managing it. I have snapshots set up to be accessible in every directory as the invisible directory .snap The snapshots are in the following format: /usr/lpp/mmfs/bin/mmcrsnapshot 1MB `TZ=GMT date + at GMT-%Y.%m.%d-%H.%M.%S` ?and look like this from the UNIX level:

I was reviewing the GPFS VFS module this afternoon after I had a request to add Thumbs.db to the hide files option. Now I was under the impression that the GPFS VFS module mapped this through to the Windows attributes on the under lying file system. That is assuming that your GPFS file system is sufficiently recent to support Windows attributes. I did some experimentations with a Terminal

Hi, I'm trying to set up samba share exporting gpfs filesystem and I strugle with setting sharemode to yes. Samba is 3.6.5, gpfs version is 3.2.1-29 (the latest available for 3.2 branch). Everything works fine when sharemode is set to no, but I'd rather insist to switch it to yes. That's what man page says: no - do not propagate sharemodes across all GPFS nodes. This should only be

Hi Rob, on your Info for Version 3.0.25 you pointed out the VFS-Module GPFS for using features of the underlaying GPFS-Filesystem. Also the man-pages-3/vfs_gpfs.8.html points to that module, but I can't find it anywhere. We are using a GPFS 3.2 3-Node Samba Cluster (3.0.24/28) on Dell HW. We would be very glad if it is posible to get - Quota Recognition for our users (we use "max

Hi all, At some point recently my customers can no longer see GPFS snapshots under the Windows Previous Versions tab. It simply says "No previous versions available". If a fileset is exported with the flag "force user = root" then Previous Versions *are* displayed. [2016/07/06 10:07:35.602080, 3] ../source3/smbd/vfs.c:1322(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name:

Hi, I am using samba samba3-3.3.4-39, with ctdb ctdb-1.0-69.x86_64, gpfs gpfs-3.2.1 on centos 5.3 x86_64. My problem is that from samba share I can't read file permissions and file ownership, although I'm in "domain admins" group, which has full permissions(rwx) via inherited acl (not user or group ownership). If I'm in a group that owns the file, I can read the permissions,

Hello, does this bug still exists: http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/IPyW4fzzpEetiWKnJyfJ ? It seems that I have the same problem, although "store dos attributes" is set (Samba 3.6.18; GPFS 3.5.0-11). Here my share definition: [shared] comment = <comment> path = <path> available = yes

Hi I'm encountering an error with some of my Windows clients when using CTDB and samba to access a GPFS hosted share. We see the following error all the time. [2011/03/14 12:31:16.549084, 1] modules/vfs_gpfs.c:1099(vfs_gpfs_ntimes) vfs_gpfs_ntimes: set GPFS ntimes failed -1 The copy continues but is slow. All the timestamps seem reasonable for the data copied. The GPFS

Running with Samba 3.5.4, the Samba3x packages from CentOS 5.6 with added gpfs and tsmsm VFS modules against a GPFS 3.4.0.6 file system. Unix extensions are turned off because otherwise OS X 10.5 messes with group ownership and permissions and shares for "groups" don't work as required. Unfortunately being at a University I don't get to control the environment tightly, unless

I'm trying to debug a phantom I/O error which I mentioned before (https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2023-March/244431.html - it turned out it has nothing to do with kernel oplocks). And noticed samba is regularly tries to load libgpfs.so. This is done in gpfswrap_init() in lib/util/gpfswrap.c, which is used in vfs_gpfs.c (understandable) *and* in lib/util/debug.c. The latter added by

Hi, On 11/15/23 09:33, Ulrich Sibiller wrote: > Thanks for that hint about case sensitivity's performance penalty. > > For clarifaction: The user is doing mainly reads, so does the > "create" you mention also cover opening/reading files? no. Is it a metadata heave small file workload? That will likely be somewhat slower compared to Windows, but not in the order of

Hello Ralph, Thanks for that hint about case sensitivity's performance penalty. For clarifaction: The user is doing mainly reads, so does the "create" you mention also cover opening/reading files? If only _creation_ of files is suffering from that we probably have some other/further performance issue. We have gpfs, which does not offer a case-insensitive mode, neither does the

[Note: CC to openssh-unix-dev added] "Ph. Marek" wrote: > I found you mail > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=104970105603800&w=2 > where you claim that you've compiled openssh in AIX. That is correct, AIX 4.2.1, 4.3.3 and 5.1. > Not my situation is as follows: > openssh-3.6.1p1 > AIX 4.2 > gcc >

IP wrote: > W dniu 2015-09-03 o 13:56, mark pisze: >> On 09/02/15 21:27, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> Am 02.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >>>> I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for >>>> Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. >>>> Trouble is, >>>> all I