similar to: removing windows 2003 from samba4

Hello Matthieu, >Did you wait for a couple of minutes (1 or 2 hours maybe) for the sync >to settle ? also did you transfer roles to the samba4 DC ? > >In anycase you should restart samba with a higher log level so that we >can have more information. > >If needed pop up in #samba-technical for more real time support. > >Matthieu. I've restarted samba with log level

I'm testing a samba4 server join AD (had 1 win2003 dc) as dc. Version: Samba4 DC: samba 4.1.1 with ubuntu (172.16.3.8) Win2003 DC: Win2003 SP2 (172.16.3.3) AD domain name: dotest.com The samba server had joined to AD as DC. When win2003 dc online, it seems works fine. When I test win2003 dc online, simulate the win2003 DC was failue, found the samba4 DC can't work fine along. The AD

Hello all,I'm trying to add a self compiled samba 4.12 DC to a Windows 2008R2 domain.Adding the samba DC was troublesome but successful (I had to modify join.py as I swa in another thread "Join Samba to a Windows AD ERR_DS_NO_CROSSREF_FOR_NC". After that I could join the samba DC and everything seemed ok. But now, when I check the DNS server on the samba DC using the windows DNS

Hello all I followed samba4 how to ( CentOS6 minimum install ) #working fro me ./configure.developer make #failed for me [root at dcmsc samba-4.0.0alpha16]# make quicktest WAF_MAKE=1 ./buildtools/bin/waf test --quick 'test' finished successfully (0.000s) Waf: Entering directory `/root/download/samba-4.0.0alpha16/bin' [ 111/3389] Generating VERSION Waf: Leaving directory

Hi, I am trying to do cross compile Samba4.?Build system generating two binary asn1_compile and compile_et to generate .c files which will then build for our platform. But it can not execute both binary files. [ 198/3298] Compiling ASN1 source4/heimdal/lib/asn1/kx509.asn1 /bin/sh: ../build_dir/target-ubicom32-unknown-linux-gnu/samba-4.0.0alpha16/bin/asn1_compile: cannot execute binary file Waf:

Hello All I noticed same minor imperfection on Samba4 How To page. Installation on CentOS6. I did as below : For RedHat 6.x: $ yum install gtkhtml setroubleshoot-server setroubleshoot-plugins policycoreutils-python libsemange-python setools-libs-python setools-libs popt-devel libpcap-devel sqlite-devel libidn-devel libxml2-devel libacl-devel libsepol-devel libattr-devel

We are proud to a announce another alpha release of Samba 4, alpha 16. What's new in Samba 4 alpha16 ============================= Samba 4.0 will be the next version of the Samba suite and incorporates all the technology found in both the Samba4 alpha series and the stable 3.x series. The primary additional features over Samba 3.6 are support for the Active Directory logon protocols used by

[2015/05/28 14:41:18.977544, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:370(binary_smbd_main) samba version 4.1.16 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2013 [2015/05/28 14:41:19.173118, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:488(binary_smbd_main) samba: using 'standard' process model [2015/05/28 14:41:19.196917, 0] ../lib/util/become_daemon.c:136(daemon_ready) [2015/05/28

[2015/05/28 14:43:54.003207, 0] ../source4/dsdb/repl/drepl_out_helpers.c:873(dreplsrv_update_refs_done) UpdateRefs failed with WERR_DS_DRA_ACCESS_DENIED/NT code 0xc0002105 for b5b7b83d-1705-4690-bdd1-3cfe3dd2c8dd._msdcs.brhc.local DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=brhc,DC=local [2015/05/28 14:46:06.541434, 0] ../source4/dsdb/repl/drepl_out_helpers.c:873(dreplsrv_update_refs_done) UpdateRefs failed with

On 05/28/2015 11:54 AM, EDGARD B SOUZA wrote: > [2015/05/28 14:41:18.977544, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:370(binary_smbd_main) > samba version 4.1.16 started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2013 > [2015/05/28 14:41:19.173118, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:488(binary_smbd_main) > samba: using 'standard' process model > [2015/05/28

Hello, i have a samba4 ad domain with 5 domain controllers. Since 2-3 weeks, i have problems with kerberos, log.samba: [2012/11/16 16:21:11, 1] ../source4/auth/gensec/gensec_gssapi.c:645(gensec_gssapi_update) GSS server Update(krb5)(1) Update failed: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Decrypt integrity check failed [2012/11/16 16:21:12, 2]

On 5/17/2018 3:58 PM, Carlos wrote: > > Hi! > > In "NTDS settings" created new connection for: > > DC2 ->DC3 > > DC3 -> DC2 > > All OK, > > I tested with option > > kccsrv:samba_kcc=No > > is ok too. > > But in my DC2, a received one erro: > > May 17 16:54:44 dc2 samba[10421]: [2018/05/17 16:54:44.543336,  0] >

On Thu, 17 May 2018 16:58:13 -0300 Carlos via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi! > > In "NTDS settings" created new connection for: > > DC2 ->DC3 > > DC3 -> DC2 > > All OK, > > I tested with option > > kccsrv:samba_kcc=No > > is ok too. > > But in my DC2, a received one erro: > > May 17 16:54:44 dc2

On Fri, 18 May 2018 08:50:44 -0300 Carlos via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks very much agian, but a really think is "good"  all dcs > replication(full  mesh). > > I read more about "sites"(link send for you). > > But i dont understand msg the erro: > > ------------------- > > May 17 16:54:44 dc2

Hi! In Option "Inter-Site Transports", i have only  one the name "DEFAULTIPSITELINK" , in properties Sites in this link: Matriz Filial Matriz -> site with DC1 and DC2 Filail ->  site With DC3 Regards; On 17-05-2018 13:12, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 5/17/2018 12:07 PM, Carlos wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Thanks for answer. >> >> But, i allowed

Hello Samba team ! On my network I have three Samba-4.1.17 domain controllers (Debian Jessie) : -> One PDC : pdc01 -> Two "slave" DC : sdc02, sdc03 I don't know why, but sometimes Samba receive the SIGTERM signal and restart even if I remove it from the logrotate configuration. On "pdc01" I see : ---------- pdc01 (log.samba) ---------- SIGTERM: killing children

At Sun, 28 Apr 2019 18:53:21 +0100 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 2019-04-28 at 12:11 -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > I am having this problem on Ubuntu 18.04 -- I manage a batch of desktop > > machines with some convience desktop launchers, which gnome3 insists are > >

On Thu, 17 May 2018 20:24:06 -0300 Carlos <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank  very much you for the explanations!! > I'm sorry for one more question... > What is wrong in DCs in mode " full mesh topology" ? I don't > understand why not... Nothing, except that you are using an openvpn link between sites (not that this really matters, it would be the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, With now release 5 and below all EOL for over 12 months[1]. What guidelines/policy is in place for removal of old and out of date content from the wiki? [1] 5 is in extended support upstream and documentation etc. remain available until November 30, 2020. Should 5 related content remain until that date? Regards Phil - -- *** If this is a

Hello，I'm using samba ad dc about a year. I have 2 DCs, One is DC1 with FSMO role. And another is DC2. there's a error in DC1 when i use dbcheck tool. And samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs--fix can't fix that. And I made a big mistake ! In DC2 I use "tdbbackup -s .bak /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb" create a bak file. and using that bak file replace the sam.ldb