similar to: Samba serving sshfs shares: can't delete files

Hello, I have a question because POSIX ACL with SMB2 max protocol does not work properly.Did you test VFS xattr acls with SMB2 max protocol? Is it working corectly? Best regards/Adrian Berlin --

I'm running Samba 3.4.7 on Ubuntu 10.04. This is a recent upgrade and we've starting experience a sporadic problem after this upgrade. When users are browsing through Windows Explorer they sometimes run across folders that appear as unassociated files. This requires the user to click the 'Refresh' button in Windows Explorer to properly see the folders. The files and folders are

Hello, Really stumped on this issue. I have samba 4.4.7 running on a new server. Users cannot write to files to which they have write permissions via group. Example: Here's the local filesystem on the samba server. I'm logged in as jmalone : jmalone at canis; cd /home/www.nrao.edu/content/logs/ : jmalone at canis; ls -l total 4 -rw-rw-r-- 1 jmalone nraoweb 0 Nov 10 10:02

Maybe I'm doing somthing really stupid, but while copying some windows share onto a samba server, on some random subdirectory robocopy says ERROR 87 (0x00000057) Copying NTFS Security to Destination Directory... The samba logfile has lots of these lines. modules/vfs_posixacl.c:349(smb_acl_to_posix) smb_acl_to_posix: ACL is invalid for set (Das Argument ist ung?ltig) The strange thing is

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:38:52AM -0500, Josh Malone via samba wrote: > All, > > Apologies for basically bumping my own thread, but I'm absolutely at > my wits' end trying to figure out this access problem. I've > replicated the issue with and without NFS being involved. On our old > 4.0.25 server, users can write to files that they have group-based > write

I've been wrestling with a problem on newer versions of samba with a configuration that "used" to work in samba 3.0.33 (RedHat Enterpise 5 packages) This maybe due to changes in the may samba maps NT permissions, but i'm not sure so I thought I would ask. I have a samba 3.3.8 (RedHat Enterprise 5.5 Samba3x packages) and samba 3.4.4 (Redhat Enterprise 6 beta packages)

Hi Everyone, I have a really huge trouble with the Acls under windows 7. I use filesystem's acls under samba and it works correctly under windows xp, but it does not in w7. I am not sure if it is a kind of bug, the case is last week I upgraded my samba 3.0 to 3.5 and my acls under w7 worked fine. Now the problem I have is if a directory is set for example with the grup 'company' and

On Ubuntu, I have upgraded to the latest LTS version, which upgraded my Samba to 3.6.3 and now getting NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED when trying to remove files and folders. This server MEDIA is setup as a member server to a FreeBSD PDC called MAIL using LDAP for authentication. All been working great for a long time, now from the PDC, I try.... mail# smbclient -U robert //media/robert WARNING: The

... does not work. I use the W2k functionality "synchronize" on my laptop to have up2date synchronized copies of my files both at the laptop and the file server. The file server is a P 200 MHz running RH Linux 9. When on-line the synchronization of files works, except for my swedish letters "???". However when off-line working with my files, then reconnecting to the

Two attached patches for samba 2.2.7a and 3.0-alfa22, that I've made today, fix 3 bugs mentioned in my previous e-mail. 1) For each file in addition to ALLOW ACE proper DENY ACE is created. 2) "Take ownership" is shown DENIED for all except root ACEs 3) Read Permissions and read attributes are always shown as allowed, as they are actually allowed. -- Zhitomirsky

Hi. I'm dealing with this "lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(1009)" message in the log file. I tried to find some hint in the net but I couldn't find anything that pointed to a solution. Below are the surrounding messages in a excerpt of the log file: [2007/04/02 17:31:10, 3] passdb/lookup_sid.c:fetch_sid_from_uid_cache(918) fetch sid from uid cache 1088 ->

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:25:24PM -0500, Josh Malone wrote: > On 11/16/16 3:17 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:12:06PM -0500, Josh Malone via samba wrote: > >>On 11/16/16 2:32 PM, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > >>>> > >>>>But the file is not root:root - it's owned by uid 12477 and group > >>>>9006. Why

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:42:45AM -0500, Josh Malone via samba wrote: > On 11/14/16 6:32 PM, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:38:52AM -0500, Josh Malone via samba wrote: > >>All, > >> > >>Apologies for basically bumping my own thread, but I'm absolutely at > >>my wits' end trying to figure out this access problem.

I need help interpeting this issue, thanks in advance. A file was created by user nli on windows 7, that user can manipulate the file at will. If user jpyeron tries to manipulate the file on XPx64 the below happens. # smbd -V Version 3.0.33-3.40.el5_10 [2015/02/02 18:34:15, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode_from_sbuf(188) dos_mode_from_sbuf returning [2015/02/02 18:34:15, 8]

All, Apologies for basically bumping my own thread, but I'm absolutely at my wits' end trying to figure out this access problem. I've replicated the issue with and without NFS being involved. On our old 4.0.25 server, users can write to files that they have group-based write permissions. On 4.5.x, 4.4.x, and 4.3.x that permission is not being honored. I would be incredibly

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:12:06PM -0500, Josh Malone via samba wrote: > On 11/16/16 2:32 PM, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > >> > >>But the file is not root:root - it's owned by uid 12477 and group > >>9006. Why is Samba getting the wrong owner/group for this file? > > > >That is the core of your problem. What does the full debug level 10 >

Hello,   I installed a samba server v 4.6.6, I use samba in classic mode (in /etc/default/sernet-samba). Samba is a member of a Windows server 2003 R2 domain.   Here is my smb.conf :   [global] use sendfile = no gpfs:getrealfilename = no smb ports = 445 139 dos charset = 850 unix charset = UTF-8 interfaces = eth0 bind interfaces only = true workgroup = MYREALM passdb backend =

Hi, I've a samba 3.0.24 server running in a debian "alike" OS with a (Open)LDAP backend and I'm having the following problem: I have LDAP users that belong to more than one (POSIX) group. For instance, I have a user2 that belongs to group "users" and "grupo2" and I have a share with the following ACL settings: getfacl /home/shares/share1/ getfacl: Removing

AIX 5.2, Samba 3.0.11, OpenLDAP 2.2.23. Can someone explain what reduce name is supposed to be checking? The final debug uses "p" as the "reduced" name, but p is NULL to start and only has a value during the code path IF there was no entry found on the first call to realpath at which point the last component is removed and we try again. Now since p points to the character

Yes, I understand. I just don't understand why there are 15 review links. as to the format of the list, we previously had a list of feature for 4.5 (before it was fully supported), we can reuse this old format. Best regards, Alexey Bataev > 6 июня 2019 г., в 19:12, Narayanaswamy, Ravi <ravi.narayanaswamy at intel.com> написал(а): > > Alexey, > Johannes want to put all