similar to: No Access after enabling SMB2

Hi Samba list! I was very excited that SMB2 is finally working with samba 3.6.0 - great job!! I just know that SMB2 has a smaller command set compared to SMB1 and this, beside many other rebuilds of the code makes it faster As I am completely new to the file transfer protocol world, I want to ask a few basic things: - is Samba backward compatible ... xp can't use SMB2 as far as I

On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > unix extensions = no > wide links = yes > > Unfortunately this still does not work for me - can you really make a symbolic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does

Hello, We are running some legacy software that instructs us to, via Windows registry settings, disable all oplocks and SMB2 entirely on each Windows workstation that connects to the Samba share where the software is hosted. The software maintainers give dire warners of corruption, etc., if oplocks (and SMB2) are left enabled. We?ve run this software off of a Samba share for 20 years and have

Hi, I'm using libsmbclient library built from source3 directory of samba-3.6.7. When I connect to a vista/2008 server using this libsmbclient library, communication is happening in SMB1 protocol and NOT in SMB2. Please note that I've enabled SMB2 by adding following line to smb.conf max protocol = SMB2 Does libsmbclient library built from source3 directory of samba-3.6.7 supports SMB2?

Hi forks: I've been testing SMB2 with samba 3.6.4 performance these days, and I find a weird benchmark that SMB2 write performance is slower than SMB1 in 10Gb ethernet network. Server ----------------------- Linux: Redhat Enterprise 6.1 x64 Kernel: 2.6.31 x86_64 Samba: 3.6.4 (almost using the default configuration) Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter RAID: Adaptec 51645 RAID

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > > > On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > > > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > > > > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > > > > > unix extensions

Hi all, At the moment we are running Debian squeeze with stock samba 3.5.6. and are testing some new samba installations from ubuntu 12.04, centos 6.4 and debian wheezy. All running in a VM on a XenServer. The samba servers are member of a 2008R2 domain, using smb1 protocol all are running fine and we get a constant 90MB/s (big file transfer) on our 1GB network. We would like to enable smb2

Hi I've a Windows 2008 R1 connected to a share on a samba 3.5.6 (this samba is a domain member of a samba pdc). All work fine. I've enabled "max protocol = smb2" : i can access the share but when it was impossible to rename a new directory named "New Folder" on the share (created by Windows new folder menu). I've the error : init_smb_request: invalid wct

Our smbclient 3.6.5 and smbclient 4.0.7 does not work with SMB2/SMB3, which is a security concern for us. Is there a patch or a workaround that can be done for those releases? I've read that Apple made changes in Maverick 10.9, which now causes failures, but am hoping that something was done to support the MAC OS 10.9 releases. Regards, Mike Tompkins

Hello, With a default CP850 dos charset, I can?t connect and receive a ?protocol negotiation failed? error message # testparm -v |grep charset Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf Module '/usr/lib/charset/CP850.so' loaded Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE dos charset = CP850 unix charset = UTF-8 display charset = LOCALE # smbclient -L MYSERVER

Hi All: I am building the torture/smbtorture for samba-4.0.0alpha17. After build, I am running the test in another environment. I not only need to copy the binary smbtorture, I also need to copy the shared libraries. This is HUGE inconvenient for us. Could somebody tell me how to build the binary using static linked libraries? Thanks very much Peixing libpthread.so.0 =>

Hi everyone, I'm trying to use samba in a small video post production house but we are not getting the performance we expected. Our setup: - CenOS 5.6 x86-64 - samba.x86_64 (3.0.33-3.29.el5_6.2 and 3.6.0rc1) - Intel based server (One 4 core Xeon E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 8 GB RAM) - 4 Intel Gigagit ethernet NIC ports with 802.3ad bonding connected to a switch configured tu use 802.3ad - 8 2TB 7.2

My name is Kenji Ichinoseki and I am in charge of a project at Sumitomo Electric Networks, Inc. Please give me cooperation by all means about the affair in the account of a title. Now, I included "Samba 3.0.37" in the Linux system currently developed (us). And it is testing using "smbtorture(samba3.5.8 source4) ". The point in question was found in our entry of this test. It

3rd one in one day. [2024/01/10 16:42:03.713034, 0, pid=2049252] ../../libcli/smb/smb2_signing.c:722(smb2_signing_check_pdu) Bad SMB2 (sign_algo_id=1) signature for message [2024/01/10 16:42:03.713044, 0, pid=2049252] ../../lib/util/util.c:571(dump_data) [0000] 73 ED 8B E2 56 72 79 4E 53 7E BE 48 DF EC 07 6E s...VryN S~.H...n [2024/01/10 16:42:03.713057, 0, pid=2049252]

Hi Samba 3.6.3 on Ubuntu. Filesystem is xfs, grpquota and usrquota are enabled. root at host:# repquota /mntpoint displays the correct data (see below). In smb.conf I defined max protocol = SMB2. When running smbcquotas //host/share -L I'm getting displayed a value of 16GB for every user share. This is the value that is displayed on the windows 7 boxes when looking at the network shares in

Hi, guys. I have an issue with accessing to my sysvol share with smb2 or smb3 clients. I have an issue with editing my Group Policy from Windows 7,8,8.1,10 or Windows Server 2012 clients with RSAT installed and everything works fine when I edit group policy from Windows XP machine. I disable SMB2 & SMB3 in my Windows server machine and it fix the problem, but is it a correct workaround for my

Our Solaris 5.10 was running Samba 3.0 with ADS security against winbind and krb5.conf, and all users were able to access it from any Windows system. Following the upgrade to a new AD server running 2008 RC2, we had to upgrade samba on most Unix systems. On Solaris, the new version was 3.5.8 from Sun. I found more config options were required to get the [homes] section to succeed, although I

Hi Recently I play with Mac OS X and find some major issues: I reported the most major issue as BUG#8042: Newly create files are always failed with NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORY <https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8042> I found other issues with Samba 3.5.8 and Mac OS X 10.6.7: - --with-readline (default) causes compile error so explicitly --without-readline is needed. And

Hi Can anyone advise me on "kernel oplocks" in a ctdb cluster. I have a ctdb (GPFS is the parallel file system) setup that uses samba (3.5.8) for cifs and IBM CNFS for NFS. Reading the documentation on kernel oplocks it seems to me that I can export the same area via samba and NFS with "kernel oplocks = Yes" . My logic is that IBM CNFS has shared NFS locking

I'm using a program on Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 that requires NTFS alternate data streams. It's talking to a Samba 3.6.0 SMB2 share configured with streams_depot. The program has been running for over a month with no obvious problems, except that the filesystem has been accumulating "lost" directories. Apparently, at some point after the whole server crashed (both are VMs