similar to: Disk full / file corrupted

Dear All! Does anyone have troubles with setting hidden attribute? Read-only set and unset properly Hindden - can't set at all mount: /mnt/disk.img on /drv1 type ext4 (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,loop=/dev/loop0,acl,user_xattr) Samba 3.5.8 smb.conf ---------------------------- [global] pid directory = /opt/samba/run lock directory = /opt/samba/cache private dir = /opt/samba/cache log file =

Hi All, Could anybody tell me the creating of pv domain on nas. I mean to say that root file sytem should be at nas location. Useful links will be most welcome. Thanks, Trilok _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello, I'm trying to access a Samba share as anonymous/guest user, so I have added the following entry inf file smb.conf (Samba 4.9) guest account = andrea map to guest = bad user ... [test] available = yes browsable = yes guest ok = yes nfs4: acedup = merge nfs4: mode = special path = /var/tmp/test read only = no and the shared directory /var/tmp/test has the following permission (so

Hello Experts, When I try to create SR with lvm over iSCSI, it always failed, I list my xe command and debug info: [root@xcp16 log]# xe sr-create host-uuid=a226200e-f7ff-4dee-b679-e5f114d1e465 content-type=user name-label=shared_disk_sr shared=true device-config:target=192.168.1.2 device-config:targetIQN=iqn.2013-07.example:shareddisk device-config:SCSIid=1IET_00010001 type=lvmoiscsi The SR is

Hi, i think this message should be removed ;) paradigm:~# umount /mnt2 paradigm:~# mkdosfs /dev/fd0 mkdosfs 2.5 (07 Jan 2000) paradigm:~# /tmp/syslinux /dev/fd0 paradigm:~# sync paradigm:~# mount /dev/fd0 /mnt2 VFS: Can't find an ext3 filesystem on dev fd(2,0). Flo -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912 Why is it called "common sense"

So, I've long known and it makes sense that when you're booted from a ZFS volume, you can't mess with the boot-loader. And, I know a few months ago I had a set of commands I would use when booted from a CD that would initialize the network and copy the "release/boot" from somewhere else so that I could install bootblocks and boot-loaders from more recent code. Sadly, I

Another question. When my database is running, I do [oracle@LNCSTRTLDB03 LPTE3]$ cp --o_direct xdb01.dbf /tmp cp: cannot open `xdb01.dbf' for reading: Permission denied [oracle@LNCSTRTLDB03 LPTE3]$ When the database is shudown it works. Is this normal for ocfs because with any other filesystem I can just copy a file at any time (Its only a testing, I know I cant copy datafiles and have

This gives EXDEV for clone operations that btrfs could otherwise execute and with slight change of circumstances will actually execute fine. Imagine we have a btrfs on /dev/mapper/foobar with subvols /foo and /bar. Let’s also imagine top of said fs in mounted at /mnt. In this case, a cross-subvol clone of /mnt/foo/srcfile to /mnt/bar/dstfile will succeed. However, if only the individual

Silly bash scripts have stuff like below to get things done, but equally silly guestfish scripts fail to add the required newline. Why is that? echo "$dev1 $mnt1 $fs $opts 1 2" >> /etc/fstab echo "$dev2 $mnt2 $fs $opts 1 2" >> /etc/fstab write-append /etc/fstab "$dev1 $mnt1 $fs $opts 1 2" : \ write-append /etc/fstab "$dev2 $mnt2 $fs $opts 1 2"

Hi Mauro, What version of Gluster are you running and what is your volume configuration? IIRC, this was seen because of mismatches in the ctime returned to the client. I don't think there were issues with the files but I will leave it to Ravi and Raghavendra to comment. Regards, Nithya On 29 December 2017 at 04:10, Mauro Tridici <mauro.tridici at cmcc.it> wrote: > > Hi All,

Currently I have a mail server running postfix and dovecot with users in mysql. I have Outlook (blich) clients checking IMAP mail on the server. I'd like to build some fault-tolerance into that system in case I have hardware failure. I've read through: http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailLocation/SharedDisk but I feel I need more information. My basic understanding is that I'll need 2

Hi All, any news about this issue? Can I ignore this kind of error message or I have to do something to correct it? Thank you in advance and sorry for my insistence. Regards, Mauro > Il giorno 29 dic 2017, alle ore 11:45, Mauro Tridici <mauro.tridici at cmcc.it> ha scritto: > > > Hi Nithya, > > thank you very much for your support and sorry for the late. > Below

Hello All! Can't make Samba use acl and extended user attributes to save DOS file attributes. Please, help me configure properly. My steps on Windows XP: 1 - Open share 2 - Open property of file 1122/22.bmp 3 - Check file attribute: hidden 4 - Click Apply 5 - Click Close 6 - Open property again 7 - Attribute Hidden not checked. Samba dont save attributes!!! getfattr -d

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12769 Bug ID: 12769 Summary: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) depending on source file system Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

Hi Nithya, thank you very much for your support and sorry for the late. Below you can find the output of ?gluster volume info tier2? command and the gluster software stack version: gluster volume info Volume Name: tier2 Type: Distributed-Disperse Volume ID: a28d88c5-3295-4e35-98d4-210b3af9358c Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 6 x (4 + 2) = 36 Transport-type: tcp Bricks:

I think it is safe to ignore it. The problem exists? due to the minor difference in file time stamps in the backend bricks of the same sub volume (for a given file) and during the course of tar, the timestamp can be served from different bricks causing it to complain . The ctime xlator[1] feature once ready should fix this issue by storing time stamps as xattrs on the bricks. i.e. all bricks

Hi Ravi, thank you very much for your support and explanation. If I understand, the ctime xlator feature is not present in the current gluster package but it will be in the future release, right? Thank you again, Mauro > Il giorno 02 gen 2018, alle ore 12:53, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> ha scritto: > > I think it is safe to ignore it. The problem exists due to the

Am 25.04.2011 19:02, schrieb Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo: > hi all > > We have an ocfs2 cluster compose of 4 Debian lenny serveurs wich have > access to an ISCSI LUN we have create a partition on this Lun and > formated this partition as OCFS2. > 2 serveurs does mail delivery (SMTP) and the two other are pop/imap > servers. The smtp servers use dovecot LDA to deliver to mailboxes.

On 01-04-2023 20:38, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 01/04/2023 19:10, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > > >> I tried using Samba once rather than NFS but that broke things. I keep my mail on the server and Thunderbird didn't work properly. Reverting to NFS fixed that. Also, Samba shares seemed slower and less reliable. NFS just works. > > I use

I messed up the subject line. I was so sure that I had taken care of it. Oh well... For documentation purposes, I resend this e-mail so that it appears in the correct thread. Sorry for the noise. On 01-04-2023 20:38, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 01/04/2023 19:10, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > > >> I tried using Samba once rather than NFS but that broke things.