similar to: [Announce] Samba 3.5.7, 3.4.12 and 3.3.15 Security Re leases Available

Release Announcements ===================== Samba 3.5.7, 3.4.12 and 3.3.15 are security releases in order to address CVE-2011-0719. o CVE-2011-0719: All current released versions of Samba are vulnerable to a denial of service caused by memory corruption. Range checks on file descriptors being used in the FD_SET macro were not present allowing stack corruption. This can cause the

Release Announcements ===================== Samba 3.5.7, 3.4.12 and 3.3.15 are security releases in order to address CVE-2011-0719. o CVE-2011-0719: All current released versions of Samba are vulnerable to a denial of service caused by memory corruption. Range checks on file descriptors being used in the FD_SET macro were not present allowing stack corruption. This can cause the

ISO pulled from http://mirror.rackspace.com/CentOS/6.6/isos/i386/CentOS-6.6-i386-minimal.iso # df -h /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386 Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /var/ISO/CentOS-6.6-i386-minimal.iso 339M 339M 0 100% /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386 # find /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386 -name initr\* /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386/isolinux/initrd.img #

On 2/17/2015 12:31 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2015-02-17 22:26 GMT+02:00 Eckert, Doug<doug.eckert at dowjones.com>: > >> >We have a DHCP/PXE server in a build environment, which is separate from >> >our Spacewalk v1.5 server. We direct builds to Satellite or Spacewalk based >> >as needed. It contains initrd & vmlinuz files for each version/arch we

Greetings, here is the output of the 'configure' step and the compile step (using the Compaq cc compiler that comes with Tru64 V5.1A. The configure reported success and most of the compile steps cam through error/warning free except for the one that stumbled. Can someone help me out here? I am willing to provide a binary for Tru64 V5.1A if we can swat this bug. We depend greatly on Rsync

It was the mid/late-90s, but I seem to recall Bourne being the default shell, although sh/ksh/csh were all available with a typical install. On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 08:02:56AM -0400, mark wrote: > > On 04/24/15 06:57, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: > > > > > >On 04/24/15 06:07, E.B. wrote:

Hi, I''d like to mark locally generated packets in the OUTPUT chain and do policy based routing (selecting one of two default gateways) based on the mark value. But when the packet hits the OUTPUT chain (in ''mangle'' table), the routing decision seems to be already made. AFAIK, locally generated packets do not pass the PREROUTING chain (so trying to mark them there

Hi all, I fear I can't rely on "open (path, O_CREAT | O_EXCL)" behaviour on samba share. The libc's doc says: If both `O_CREAT' and `O_EXCL' are set, then `open' fails if the specified file already exists. This is guaranteed to never clobber an existing file. But this isn't probably true on network filesystems. When I run this tiny program on

We have a DHCP/PXE server in a build environment, which is separate from our Spacewalk v1.5 server. We direct builds to Satellite or Spacewalk based as needed. It contains initrd & vmlinuz files for each version/arch we currently deploy for both RHEL & CEL. I'd like to keep the storage footprint to a minimum, if possible. Keeping a big directory of ISOs to loop-mount for kickstart

> On Dec 21, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Paul <paul at sec.in.tum.de> wrote: > > Hi Mehdi, > > thanks a lot for your email. Actually I was disappointed by the fact that I was not able to get a useful answer to my two questions. > As I observed that the questions move down along the list with time passing I decided to re-post them in the hope that the questions > will have a

Trying to use "minimal" ISOs The 64-bit CEL 7.0 and 6.6 look ok so far. but when I try to set up the CEL 6.6 i386, but I get the following - The initrd could not be found at the specified location: /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386/images/pxeboot/initrd.img It does have the initrd.img file in .../isolinux, but for some reason, not in .../images/pxeboot On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at

I just recently upgraded to opensuse 11.4. basic smbd is running mostly fine (some name res-errors, login server missing, (can't connect to Domain service). Notably nmbd won't start due to undefined symbols: /usr/sbin/nmbd: symbol lookup error: /usr/sbin/nmbd: undefined symbol: _talloc_realloc_array. ldd -r shows a bunch of similar undefined symbols (shown further below). my samba rpm

Hallo, I'm trying to convert smbpasswd to passdb.tdb. cd /etc/samba/private # (where smbpasswd lies) pdbedit -i smbpasswd -e tdbsam:/etc/samba/private/passdb.tdb converts all human users, but it converts (or transfers) no machine account. In "smbpasswd" are many entries beginning with (p.e.) mac001$ for these accounts, pdbedit -L -v | grep -i mac shows

2015-02-17 22:26 GMT+02:00 Eckert, Doug <doug.eckert at dowjones.com>: > We have a DHCP/PXE server in a build environment, which is separate from > our Spacewalk v1.5 server. We direct builds to Satellite or Spacewalk based > as needed. It contains initrd & vmlinuz files for each version/arch we > currently deploy for both RHEL & CEL. > > I'd like to keep the

Hello, I'm one of the maintainers of samba packages in Debian. As of now, Debian squeeze provides samba 3.5.6. As per Debian policy wrt updates in the "stable" releases of the distribution, providing 3.5.8 (and later) is not an option we'll be considering for future updates. The policy of our release team is indeed more conservative than the policy of the Samba Team (no offense

On the Samba wiki page "Samba3 Release Planning", the following is stated: "Thursday, February 2011 - Planned release date for Samba 3.5.7" Which of the February Thursdays will it be? 10, 17 or 24? The quoted page resides here: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Release_Planning_for_Samba_3.5 Thank you!

On 04/24/15 06:57, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: > > On 04/24/15 06:07, E.B. wrote: >> I'm sure most people here know about Dash in Debian. Have there >> been discussions about providing a more efficient shell in Centos >> for use with heavily invoked non-interactive scripts? >> >> With sh being a link to bash in Centos I don't know if it would >> explode

Hi folks, i've set up a samba 3.5.7 as a ADS Memberserver (W2K3). Accessing this server from xp, vista or server 2003 is no problem. trying to access it from windows 2008 results in "network path not found" or generic network error. Last entries in logfile: [2010/05/11 12:48:01.055041, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2010/05/11

Hi! i think i found the root cause of my post "wbinfo -i WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND on samba 4.2.2": The 4.2.2 Version of wbinfo -i does not get the unix primary group gid as defined in the Active Directory. Instead it gets the gid of the Windows primary Group (Macintosh and posix compatible). The old 3.3.15 Version of wbinfo does that correctly. I have both samba 3.3.15 and samba

Hello, we're using Samba 3.4.12 on older installation of Gentoo (2.6.34-gentoo-r12) to serve files to AD users and after Samba restart, users can't connect to shared folders - error on client side: session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE; errors on server side - Get_Pwnam_internals didn't find user [user]!,check_ntlm_password: winbind authentication for user [user] FAILED with