similar to: Samba bug 7818 / Debian bug 603729 RESOLVED finally (I think)

I believe this is completely OT, but I want to be positive. I have a fully up to date CentOS 5.2 box. During the past week, when surfing with Firefox (and today, while testing with Konqueror), frequently, especially when DNS is slow, I am seeing references to opendns.com At times, I end up on opendns.com web pages, instead of at the web site I'm trying to get to. My ISP, the phone company,

A few weeks ago I asked about firewalls and family filters. Lanny Marcus, I believe, suggested OpenDNS. Just wanted to thank him (and everyone here) for their suggestions. Eventually I would like to learn about firewalls, but I don't really want to run another machine at this time. OpenDNS is trivial to set up on the router and looks to be just about exactly what I wanted. Thanks. Sorry to

To start, I know I need to upgrade SYSLINUX, but since we are using the CMenu's it's not that easy of an upgrade. I have been (slowly) working on a new iPXE/pxelinux 4.04 install that I am migrating to. However, I have an interesting problem. Using any of the examples I have seen, I can not make pxechain.com work. "pxechain.com ::/path/pxelinux.0" "pxechain.com

Using CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) on my Desktop with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.12. With one web site (LinkShare) I am getting an SSL error, after clicking to get a more advanced report I do not get that error, using Mozilla Firefox 3.0.13 on M$ Windows and I get the report OK on Windows. It appears, when using Firefox on Linux, that it is not ending up on the LinkShare web site and Firefox is giving me the

Hi all, I have a problem using named with different CentOS5 servers (2 servers): all they are really slow to resolv any internet address and most of time fails to resolv. This situation differs if I use "forwarders" servers like opendns: resolving names it is really really quickly. And I don't understand why. On the other hand I have tested three DNS servers using Windows

FYI, I'll plan on removing this subtree on Monday of next week if no one else chimes in requesting a reprieve... On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:59 PM, PyLLVM <pyllvm at gmail.com> wrote: > No objection. > I'm studying LLVM on Win32 using visual studio. > CMake works well for it. > > > On Oct 26, 7:44 am, Chandler Carruth <chandl... at google.com> wrote: >>

Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> writes: > FYI, I'll plan on removing this subtree on Monday of next week if no > one else chimes in requesting a reprieve... The Visual C++ project files are still there. Anyone objected by private e-mail? Can we know the reasons just in case we can enhance the cmake build on accordance? In the past, the only reason for not removing

On Nov 6, 2009, at 9:10 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> writes: > >> FYI, I'll plan on removing this subtree on Monday of next week if no >> one else chimes in requesting a reprieve... > > The Visual C++ project files are still there. > > Anyone objected by private e-mail? Can we know the reasons just in > case

I'm having a peculiar problem with Firefox only on my Centos 5 desktop. Every time I try a link from a search engine and even when I type in a location, I get a redirect error: "The page isn't redirecting properly. "Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this address in a way that will never complete." However, any link in my bookmarks works,

A few days ago I upgraded from 3.0.2 to 3.0.9, and since the upgrade, the winbindd_idmap.tdb has not ever been modified, even after several restarts of samba, and reboots of the system in question. It appears that the UID mapping is still correct on the samba server, but I am just concerned that new user additions etc are not being stored to the tdb files. winbind_cache.tdb is being updated with

Hello all, I'd like to know how to clear winbind cache. The problem is that we have decided to change uid and gid mapping range, but changing smb.conf accordingly didn't help. We use ldap as backend. After deleting all idmap entries in ldap nothing changed. If we disable winbindd caching with -n switch we receive desired effect - users get mapped to new uids and gids. Restarting winbindd

and 'host google.com 8.8.8.8' also gives the expected output? Like this: > root at pf:~# host google.com 8.8.8.8 > Using domain server: > Name: 8.8.8.8 > Address: 8.8.8.8#53 > Aliases: > > google.com has address 74.125.136.100 > google.com has address 74.125.136.113 > google.com has address 74.125.136.101 > google.com has address 74.125.136.138 >

On 21:52:01 wrote Ryan Ashley: > Alright, I already gave every group a gIDNumber using the "advanced > features" option via the "Attribute Editor". Each group has a unique > ID. There are 16 built-in groups (domain admins, domain users, etc) > and five I have. My last group ended with 10021. The first group was > 10001. I then stopped S4 on my print-server,

=================================================================== "Food is for eating, and good food is to be enjoyed... I think food is, actually, very beautiful in itself." Delia Smith ================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.5. Major enhancements in

=================================================================== "Food is for eating, and good food is to be enjoyed... I think food is, actually, very beautiful in itself." Delia Smith ================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.5. Major enhancements in

On 08/07/2019 19:03, Ryan via samba wrote: >> 'idmap_rfc2307' got me thinking about the other rarely used backends and >> I wonder if you could use 'idmap_script', see 'man idmap_script' for >> (limited) info >> >> Rowland >> >> Hi Rowland, > Indeed, I switched to using the idmap_script back end. For posterity (in > case it

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone, In keeping with the FreeBSD Security Team policy concerning the EoL dates for "Normal" support releases, "a minimum of 12 months after the release, and for sufficient additional time (if needed) to ensure that there is a newer release for at least 3 months before the older Normal release expires" the EoL date

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone, In keeping with the FreeBSD Security Team policy concerning the EoL dates for "Normal" support releases, "a minimum of 12 months after the release, and for sufficient additional time (if needed) to ensure that there is a newer release for at least 3 months before the older Normal release expires" the EoL date

On 7/8/08, Marko A. Jennings <markobiz at bluegargoyle.com> wrote: > On Tue, July 8, 2008 10:03 pm, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Lanny Marcus <lmmailinglists at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On 7/8/08, Lanny Marcus <lmmailinglists at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Ross Cavanagh

I am currently working on implementing unified logons between linux and win computers on an NT4 domain. I have a samba test server with winbind working properly. All is going well, except that I am concerned about the winbind idmap database stored on the local linux workstations. My current understanding of winbind is that it must be on every machine, unless an winbind samba ldap