similar to: Reserved WINS name records and Samba WINS

Given a DC environment where very few (1-3) hosts actually need to be discovered via browsing is there a good way to limit what is browseable? I'm thinking of something like a read-only WINS - where WINS provides only those servers that need be contacted and doesn't allow client registrations. Such as a wins.dat that only contains the following: ========================================

On 10/10/2019 20:35, Luca Olivetti via samba wrote: > El 10/10/19 a les 21:07, Rowland penny via samba ha escrit: > >>> >> It works in a similar way to how I update dns records and I have >> similar records in AD and they replicate. > > Oh, but they do. Until the replication chokes on those deleted records. I think you misunderstood what I tried to say, I have the

El 10/10/19 a les 21:07, Rowland penny via samba ha escrit: >> > It works in a similar way to how I update dns records and I have similar > records in AD and they replicate. Oh, but they do. Until the replication chokes on those deleted records. Never happened until September 25 (though I realized only today when a manually added host resolved erratically). > > Can you post

I am seeing the following messages logged every 20 min on a Centos 5.5 Samba 3.5.7 (SerNet RPMs) PDC. wins server = yes is set and the 172.17.1.50 address is the address of the PDC. From a Windows client perspective the the domain is functioning as expected. There is a Samba BDC and mulitple Win2008 R2 member servers in the domain. Are they anything to be concerned about? [2011/03/11

On 11/05/15 18:56, bar?? tombul wrote: > What is your opinion about the cause and solution I thought I gave you the cause, your clients are trying to update their own dns records, they are denied and then the system you have set up to update dns carries out the update. The solution, stop the clients trying to update their own records, your clients are probably windows and if so, it is a

this is my named.log file. Have the dark line problem? best regards. May 10 08:11:08 samba named[752]: queries: info: client 127.0.0.1#54056 ( WPAD.test.com): query: WPAD.test.com IN A + (127.0.0.1) May 10 08:11:08 samba named[752]: queries: info: client 127.0.0.1#54056 ( WPAD.test.com): query: WPAD.test.com IN AAAA + (127.0.0.1) May 10 08:11:08 samba named[752]: queries: info: client

Dear all, I am facing a peculiar situation: on my smb.conf log level = 5, and on my windows machine I log on as a local administrator to add remote desktop users that are in fact domain users. When my worgroup = SOMETHING, everything works fine. When I change my worgroup to: workgroup = example.com, and try to add a new remote desktop user, and set as an object name example.com\user and try

Hi all, root@terra:/var/log/samba# nmblookup -S PDC querying PDC on 10.0.0.255 10.0.0.4 PDC<00> Looking up status of 10.0.0.4 PDC <00> - H <ACTIVE> root@terra:/var/log/samba# nmblookup -S testefinal querying testefinal on 10.0.0.255 10.0.0.100 testefinal<00> Looking up status of 10.0.0.100 TESTEFINAL

OK, not exactly a samba issue but maybe the Ubuntu maintainer reads this list and can provide some input. Problem: Ubuntu doesn't daemonize smbd. System: Ubuntu Lucid where a recent update moved many startup scripts into the "upstart" system. Now smbd is started and runs as "smbd -F". If I edit the upstart script (/etc/init/smbd.conf) so that it runs as "smbd

I'm trying to replace an old Windows 2000 server that is current set up with a number of open anonymous shares used by a legacy application that must remain in production for a few more years. I spent a few hours trying to create anonymous shares on a 2008 R2 box but gave up. My next idea was to use Samba to create an anonymous share, and following this quick-n-dirty HowTo:

Hi! I need to add static entries to my Samba 3.0.9 WINS server but I can't. Let's explain: The "Samba Collection Howto" chapter "Network Browsing" , section "Static WINS Entries" tells that I can edit my "wins.dat" file (/opt/samba/var/locks/wins.dat) to set the TTL of some entries to 0 . No matter if I edit the TTL of some existing entries

Everyone, I have set up squid as a proxy http server in order to filter web access for an office that wants to block certain web sites. Is there a way to use the dhcpd server to assign the squid server and port number 3128 to each Linux desktop when they boot using the existing dhcpd server. Or do I need to change each user's network preference setup in firefox. The dhcpd server and

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:54:02 +0200 Philippe Maladjian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > *Philippe MALADJIAN > Responsable informatique | administrateur système* > Ligne directe : +33 (0)4 72 14 50 66 | pmaladjian at hilaire.fr > <mailto:pmaladjian at hilaire.fr> > > > > > Le 03/10/2018 à 16:33, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : >

On my RedHat Cluster I am trying to configure samba shares that can be relocated or fail over from one node to anoter. This is done by: 1. mounting the corresponding file system on the node from SAN 2. having the cluster assign the corresponding virtual ip number to that node 3. I tried to run an aditional instance of samba for that share ( See posting: "security = domain -- samba adds its

For some reason, rails is generating this SQL: SELECT FIRST 1 * FROM questions WHERE (parent_id IS NULL) ORDER BY position DESC 1. There is no column named position referenced in my code. 2. POSITION is a reserved word in SQL92. It is the name of a string function that returns the offset of one string within another. I believe that this is a bug in Rails. Either position should be

I am trying to use static wins entries, as stated in the Official Samba Howto Collection. One Samba server (VServer) is with wins service enabled. Another (Server1) is not, but it has the wins server in its smb.conf. When I set wins.dat at VServer: "SERVER1#00" 0 192.168.6.231 192.168.1.231 66R "SERVER1#03" 0 192.168.6.231 192.168.1.231 66R "SERVER1#20" 0

I?m testing moving a current Samba PDC configuration from an existing Unix server to a new Debian server, and as expected, can?t login to the new PDC from a PC which had been connected to the old PDC. The new Debian Samba configuration is working okay in that I can join a new PC to it, login, and access shares. In a test environment I renamed the Debian server?s host and domain names to

On Apr 17, 2012, at 9:09 PM, Lei Mou wrote: > I'm writing to ask the differences between a "reserved" register and an "unallocable" register. In X86 backend, for example, the stack pointer register and instruction pointer are reserved but allocatable. In the Doxygen document of function llvm::TargetRegisterInfo::getReservedRegs, it says that a reserved register is one

On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 11:22 +0200, Philippe Maladjian via samba wrote: > *Philippe MALADJIAN > Responsable informatique | administrateur système* > Ligne directe : +33 (0)4 72 14 50 66 | pmaladjian at hilaire.fr > <mailto:pmaladjian at hilaire.fr> > > > > > Le 03/10/2018 à 17:29, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:54:02 +0200

*Philippe MALADJIAN Responsable informatique | administrateur système* Ligne directe : +33 (0)4 72 14 50 66 | pmaladjian at hilaire.fr <mailto:pmaladjian at hilaire.fr> Le 03/10/2018 à 16:33, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:01:33 +0200 > Philippe Maladjian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, I realize the preparation of