similar to: Share name length limit?

I am trying to build Samba 3.5.6 on an HP-UX 11.11 system, and I get this error: Compiling libsmb/libsmb_thread_impl.c In file included from ./../nsswitch/winbind_nss.h:54, from ./../nsswitch/winbind_nss_config.h:49, from ./../nsswitch/winbind_client.h:1, from include/includes.h:681, from libsmb/libsmb_thread_impl.c:20:

I've run into an error when trying to compile libnet/libnet_join.c: cc: "libnet/libnet_join.c", line 111: error 1588: "LDAP_NO_MEMORY" undefined. cc: "libnet/libnet_join.c", line 111: warning 563: Argument #2 is not the correct type. The source below is what triggers it (line 111 is marked): static ADS_STATUS libnet_connect_ads(const char *dns_domain_name,

I'm trying to build Samba 3.5.6 with winbind enabled on a Solaris 10 machine and I've hit the following errors: Error without -lintl in the Makefile: Undefined first referenced symbol in file libintl_gettext utils/net.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8) libintl_textdomain

I'm running a PDC on Samba 3.60. Just freshly upgraded it from Samba 3.028a with the purpose of supporting Windows 7. However though all the existing users and computers are running fine, I'm stumped trying to join a new Windows 7 machine to it. I have applied the DomainCompatibility registry fix. When I try to join a Windows 7 workstation I will get this message : The join operation

Hello, Can someone help me to track down the source of this problem? I'm trying to access a file server running on a Belkin modem with an attached USB drive. Judging my the quality of the firmware on the device, I'd say there's a good chance of it being buggy. But it works well enough on a Windows machine, even one running inside Virtualbox under Linux. I therefore see no reason

Samba Version: 3.4.7 OS: Ubuntu Lucid 10.04 Setup: This samba box is a member of a win2k active directory domain and functions as a file server. Files/directories shared out utilize file system acls. smb.conf portion for share in question: [Accounting] comment = Accounting Share path = /netdrives/accounting browsable = yes read only = no map archive = no map system = yes

Hi, I upgraded to 3.6.0, but since that time, I can't connect to a share on a NT4 Wks host any more: # /usr/bin/smbclient //molek-04/lightcycler -U administrator protocol negotiation failed: NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT I thought it could be something with 'client ntlmv2 auth", what is 'yes' since that version. But even if I switch it to 'no' it's the same. What

I am experiencing a strange problem that I hope someone out there has experience withf. We have a large fileserver running samba 3.6 backed by a 12T ext4 filesystem. We keep lots of VMware VMs on the filestore and I am trying to make some improvements to how we manage/launch/use the VMs. To that end, I've been trying to launch the VMs via the VMware VIX API by UNC path (not mapped drive).

Hi list, i'm have samba installed at debian squeeze 2.6.32-5-686 :~# dpkg -l | grep samba ii samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze2 SMB/CIFS file, print, and login server for Unix ii samba-common 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze2 common files used by both the Samba server and client ii samba-common-bin 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze2

Hi, I had a linux server installed with samba 3.0.9-2.6 (SuSE 9.1) and a samba shared folder among 12 PC under WinXP/Win7. The linux server has been replaced by a new one a week ago. The new machine runs samba 3.5.4-5.1.2x86-64 with the same shared folder and the same smb.conf file. Till then, when the PCs try to connect to the samba share via explorer a window opens with the message "Num?ro

Hello, I use Debian Squeeze with Samba 3.5.6. I do experience problems that might be related to those described in bug 7892 that can be found found here: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7892 I could not find any information about this bug being fixed in Samba 3.5.x. In the realease notes of Samba 3.4.10 I found this: '* BUG 7892: Fix stale lock in open_file_fchmod().' As

Hello, We are currently installing Redhat v6, and came accross some weird behaviour from winbind. We are member of many groups in our AD. When we try to login with pam enabled access we get the following messages : -- cache_traverse_validate_fn: key length too large: (1534) > (1024) or cache_traverse_validate_fn: key length too large: (4138) > (1024) -- When we run winbind without cache

Hello, We have the following configuration: - OpenLDAP 2.4.21 - Samba 3.5.2 - Windows 7 x64 - Roaming Profiles We have 2500 users and format of usernames are: name.firtsname.secondname (Spanish has first and second name) Windows 7 clients are joined to the Samba domain. Everything works fine, users can logon in Samba domain, network volumes (F: , G: ...) are mapped correctly and the user

Many of my clients installed kb2536276 on their windows client and can no longer connect to my samba server. Their sessions don't even get logged. I upgraded to 3.5.9 on my test server with no luck. Encrypted with local authentication to the smbpassword file seems to work fine, but I need the servers running non encrypted samba to work. I'm running 3.5.6 on AIX 5.3 using PAM auth and

Hi I've a Windows 2008 R1 connected to a share on a samba 3.5.6 (this samba is a domain member of a samba pdc). All work fine. I've enabled "max protocol = smb2" : i can access the share but when it was impossible to rename a new directory named "New Folder" on the share (created by Windows new folder menu). I've the error : init_smb_request: invalid wct

Hi all, We are trying to export RozoFS (a scale out nas, see www.rozofs.org) with Samba to windows clients, but we're facing a strange behavior. While every thing sounds good, windows 7 explorer fails to delete directories recursively. We create a directories foo/bar on the share, if we suppress foo with the explorer, bar is suppressed but not foo (do it twice and you're done), on the

Hello from Germany, I have a problem with the following constellation: A Samba-Fileserver - Samba 3.5.6 - running in a Windows AD as a member server using idmap_ad for the mapping the User-IDs. This all works fine as long as the LDAP-port 389 is available on the domain controllers. Now, our AD admin wants to close this and move over to LDAPS. And here is my problem. How do I configure my Samba

Dear I'm using samba 3.5.6 + PDC and connected to LDAP directory In log level 1 there is many entries like this : Feb 18 18:24:54 samba smbd[5285]: lp_bool(): value is NULL or empty! Feb 18 18:27:15 samba smbd[6817]: [2011/02/18 18:27:15.371644, 0] param/loadparm.c:5856(lp_bool) Feb 18 18:27:15 samba smbd[6817]: lp_bool(): value is NULL or empty! Feb 18 18:27:32 samba net:

Hi all, At the moment we are running Debian squeeze with stock samba 3.5.6. and are testing some new samba installations from ubuntu 12.04, centos 6.4 and debian wheezy. All running in a VM on a XenServer. The samba servers are member of a 2008R2 domain, using smb1 protocol all are running fine and we get a constant 90MB/s (big file transfer) on our 1GB network. We would like to enable smb2

** Low Priority ** Hi Volker, This is regarding your fix on recycled PIDs. I am an NCP developer from Novell and we use libsmbsharemodes library from Samba for Cross Protocols Locks between NCP, Samba and others. I have few queries regarding your fix. In your fix, you have added a new field called 'unique_id' in the server_id structure and we need to pass this in our call to samba