similar to: Samba Shares access problems

Hello, I have a server with 4 NICS running CentOS 5.2. I have bonded the interfaces together such that 'bond0' consists of eth0-3. This is not a problem, and works fine. However, I now need to create a virtual interface. In a non-bonded server I would just create something like eth0:1, but with a bonded interface I am a bit confused. I have created bond0:1 simple by copying the

Hi all, I've got two gigabit ethernet interfaces bonded in CentOS 5.6. I've set "miimode=1000" and I've tried "mode=" 0, 4 and 6. I've not been able to get better than 112MB/sec, which is the same as the non-bonded interfaces. My config files are: === cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-{eth1,eth2,bond0} # SN1 HWADDR=00:30:48:fd:26:71

Hi, Sorry of this is the wrong list, trying to find some help. I am trying to set up 2 KVM hosts using Debian 9 (connecting to a 3 node Centos 7.4 gluster cluster) To get the bandwidth I have bonded 2 NICS each end. However while the network works fine for the Debian VM host the VM guests cannot connect/get an IP using DHCP connecting to br0. (Same setup on the Centos end works fine however)

Hi, I am facing a problem when I run tc on the bonded nic cards. When I run tc on a single nic card, it worked perfectly fine. But when I run tc on a bond of two nics, tc gives poor performance. The two nics were bonded in round-robin (load balancing) mode. I created a qdisc, class and a filter as follows: tc qdisc add dev bond0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev bond0 parent 1: classid

Hello I have two linux machines connected via 2 dsl lines (bonded) 192.168.0.1-eth0-dsl---2Mbit---dsl-eth0-192.168.0.2 ^-eth1-dsl---2Mbit---dsl-eth1-^ so the final figure is something like this: 192.168.0.1-bond0---4Mbit---bond0-192.168.0.2 I can only use arp monitoring for fail checking - if one dsl line fails - automatically use only the other one. I set up everything correctly (i

Hello All, I seem to have run into a bug with the new --bridgeslaves=<INTERFACE> option. It would seem that if I tell the bridge device to use a virtual interface (like bond0) rather than a physical interface (em1/em2) that kickstart completely barfs on it. I have provided my network section below which works fine as long as i don't enable all the bridge content. When the

Has anyone successfully created a bonded interface (bond0) with say two nics AND also then aliased that interface to get bond0 and bond0:1 (for an alias ip) I just want to know if it's possible and reliable Thanks -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada

Hello everyone I am running into some strange issues when configuring networking interfaces on my physical server running Centos 7.5. Let me give you an overview of what's going on: We have a physical server, running CentOS 7.5. This server has one 4 port NIC and one 2 port NIC and a Dell IDRAC port. The first port of the 4 port NIC, em1, is used for Management traffic. The first port of

Hi, This may sound crazy but I will go ahead anyway. Here's my scenario: ifconfig bond0 10.10.10.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 ifenslave bond0 eth0 ifenslave bond0 eth1 brctl addbr stp0 brctl addif stp0 bond0 brctl stp stp0 on Is this a valid scenario? I am trying to bond two interfaces and run STP over the bonded interface..The problem I am trying to solve is to run STP over aggregated links

Hello, I?m trying to configure a CentOS 7 server to act as a host for a bunch of virtual servers (KVM). I have an 802.3ad bonded Ethernet connected to the server with a bunch of tagged VLANs. I want to be able to build a bridge interface on the server for each VLAN and then attach that to the bond interface and the virtual clients. I also want to attach a host interface to one of the VLANs

Hi! I just upgraded a machine to 7.7.1908 and the default route is not being set on boot. This particular server has a bonded interface, and the corresponding configuration for the master is ( /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0): TYPE=Bond BOOTPROTO=none DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes NAME=bond0 DEVICE=bond0 ONBOOT=yes IPADDR=10.3.20.131 PREFIX=24

Hello everyone, I''m trying to get multiple guests to connect their networks to the Xen network bridge xenbr0 that''s tied to two bonded interfaces. My current dom0 network looks like this: (eth0 + eth1) => bond0 -> pbond0 -> xenbr0 eth0 and eth1 are bonding under Red Hat EL5, and Xen is configured to use bond0 as the main network device. Xend-config is set to use the

Since CentOS 6.4, anaconda supports kickstarting from bonded interfaces. Has anyone managed to get this working? Bonding modes 1, 5, 6 work fine, and they do not need any particular support on the switch. But modes 0, 2-4 are a different story, no luck here. network --onboot yes --device bond0 --activate --bootproto static --bondslaves=eth0,eth1 --bondopts=mode=balance-rr,miimon=100 --ip 1.2.3.4

I am able to bring up a bonded NIC in Centos4 without requiring to bring up the bond0 with an ip address, but with CentOS-3 I must assign the NIC an address or eth0 and eth1 will not slave. I need to bring bond0 up without an ip address becuase I will be using tagged VLANs. ie. <snip /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0> DEVICE=bond0 BOOTPROTO=none ONBOOT=yes IPADDR=169.254.0.1

I have a bonded interface running in mode 1 which is active/passive and no issue with this. I need to change it to mode 0 for active/active setup. Does mode 0 is dependent on the switches configuration? My setup is: 2 links from bonded interface is connected to different switches. When I change to mode0 from mode1 , bond0 is not coming up. These are the steps I performed 1) changed to options

I'm running into a situation where a bogus bonded interface named "bond0" is being created, in addition to the desired "bond2" interface. Can anyone confirm this? Anyone know why it's happening or what I do to get rid of it? I wanted to start my numbering scheme at 2 instead of 0, which I didn't think would be a problem. As you can see, I have no reference

On 20/09/2019 04:55, Carlos A. Carnero Delgado wrote: > Hi! > > I just upgraded a machine to 7.7.1908 and the default route is not being > set on boot. This particular server has a bonded interface, and the > corresponding configuration for the master is ( > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0): > > TYPE=Bond > BOOTPROTO=none > DEFROUTE=yes >

I four nodes setup to do active-backup bonding and the drivers loaded for the bonded network interfaces vary between tg3 and e100. All interfaces with the e100 driver loaded report errors much like what you see here: bonding: bond0: link status definitely down for interface eth2, disabling it e100: eth2: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex bonding: bond0: link status definitely up for

I have a samba server running on Linux that has two ethernet cards (eth0 & eth1) that are bonded into a single virtual interface (bond0). This virtual interface is connected to the corporate LAN and I have another ethernet card (eth2) that is connected to another server that is used for making incremental backups. The problem that I am having is that no matter what I do, the command "net

Hi, We have a Dell server with 4 Ethernet interface. I would to aggregate them in a bond. Everything work but the default gateway doesn?t work on the ? bond0 ? interface and I have no links. My configuration: - CentOS 7: :/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts# uname -a Linux nas-mtd2 3.10.0-957.5.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Feb 1 14:54:57 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux - NetworkManager disabled: