similar to: Windows 7 and file ownership

My AD server is Win2003. And my linux server is ubuntu. Samba version is 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.12 and 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.7. They are join into the Win2003 AD as normal smb servers (not DC). After Win2003 DC autoupdate last week, I can't use smbclient access all samba server with NTLMv2: ~$ smbclient //172.16.3.13/share -U testuser Enter DOMAIN\testuser's password: session setup

On 17/03/15 10:13, Sense Zeng wrote: > And use ntlm_auth fail too: > > ntlm_auth --username=testuser > password: > NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE: Logon failure (0xc000006d) > > > 2015-03-17 7:30 GMT+00:00 Sense Zeng <opaperjam at gmail.com>: > >> My AD server is Win2003. And my linux server is ubuntu. Samba version is >> 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.12 and

I could use some input to point out the error in my configuration, which eludes me. Previously I operated a 225-node cluster with samba 4.3 and sssd on the Linux boxes. Everything worked OK. Now I am using samba 4.11.6 on CentOS 7.7, patched up to date. The DC, on a KVM VM, is the only node configured so far. I am using winbind in place of sssd (my first experience with winbind). BIND9_DLZ

And use ntlm_auth fail too: ntlm_auth --username=testuser password: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE: Logon failure (0xc000006d) 2015-03-17 7:30 GMT+00:00 Sense Zeng <opaperjam at gmail.com>: > My AD server is Win2003. And my linux server is ubuntu. Samba version is > 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.12 and 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.7. They are join into > the Win2003 AD as normal smb servers (not

Hi everyone We're really struggling with nfs4 <--> windows acls. Scenario Samba4 share --> cifs --> win7. No problem Samba4 share --> nfs4 --> Linux. acls not inherited Neither is there inheritance vica versa. e.g. It is not possible to create files with group rw on a umask 0022 nfs4 share. nfs4_setfacl cannot override umask. Using POSIX or windows acls this works

On Sat, 15 Feb 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 15/02/2020 19:15, Steve Thompson via samba wrote: >> Now I am using samba 4.11.6 on CentOS 7.7, patched up to date. > Have you compiled Samba yourself, or are you using Samba packages and if so, > where from ? >> The DC, on a KVM VM, is the only node configured so far. I am using >> winbind in place of sssd

Always show info like ''operation not supported''. Any workaround? Thanks. Fred -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20110316/2f58e589/attachment.html>

great thanks Steve ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Mario Pio Russo, System Admin SWG IT Services Dublin, Phone & FAX: +353 1 815 2236, eMail: mariopiorusso at ie.ibm.com IBM Ireland Product Distribution Limited registered in Ireland with number 92815. Registered Office: IBM House, Shelbourne Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 (Embedded

On 08/05/15 12:49, Mario Pio Russo wrote: > Hi all > > just going back to this, Steve can you please expalin where did you take > this number from? 11644473600 > > that seems not to work correctly on my system so I was lookin g how to > tailor down the right value > > thanks > > >

Instead of trying to split and parse elements from virtio-win paths, use the '*.inf' files supplied with the drivers to control how Windows drivers are installed. The following emails best explain how this works: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-October/msg00352.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-November/msg00065.html Currently the product variant (eg.

This idea is intruiging... Suppose one has a set of file servers called A, B, C, D, and so forth, all running CentOS 6.5 64-bit, all being interconnected with 10GbE. These file servers can be divided into identical pairs, so A is the same configuration (diks, processors, etc) as B, C the same as D, and so forth (because this is what I have; there are ten servers in all). Each file server has

I am running Samba 3.5.5 on Solaris 10. This is the latest Sun/Oracle provided build. I have an ldap backend for everything (unix+samba accounts, idmapping for domain trusts.) The Samba server is a PDC for a domain we can call "SAMBA." Each samba account is tied to a unix account. I have a one-way domain trust setup with a Windows 2003 domain which we can call

I'm testing a samba4 server join AD (had 1 win2003 dc) as dc. Version: Samba4 DC: samba 4.1.1 with ubuntu (172.16.3.8) Win2003 DC: Win2003 SP2 (172.16.3.3) AD domain name: dotest.com The samba server had joined to AD as DC. When win2003 dc online, it seems works fine. When I test win2003 dc online, simulate the win2003 DC was failue, found the samba4 DC can't work fine along. The AD

Hi list, I run a Samba-3.0.0beta3 / Heimdal-0.6 system and want it to be the BDC of our Win2003-controlled domain. The reason is that we had to move from our perfectly working samba-PDC to a windows system and I want to keep the user profiles on the old, but stronger, Linux box(now on SuSE8.2). I get(kinit) a ticket of the Win2003 without any problem, even for admin users. But If I try to connect

Hi I installed xen by following this link: http://www.howtoforge.com/virtualization-with-xen-on-debian-lenny-amd64 Dom0(debian) has two IP :174.x.x.79 , 67.x.x.32 gateway is 174.x.x.65 DomU(win2003) IP is :67.x.x.38 The problem is : 1.weird network issue in win2003(can not access the internet in win2003): A:weird ping time for 127.0.0.1 B:weird ping time for its own ip 67.x.x.38 C:timeout

Samba 4.1.16, Centos 6.6 x86-64, BIND_DLZ 9.9. I have three AD DC's that were functioning normally. However, today I restarted BIND on one node, and it failed to start with this message in the log (names changed): May 10 07:02:49 benford named[6767]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen May 10 07:02:49 benford named[6767]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=samdom,DC=example,DC=com May

I had a AD with 4 Win2003 DC. Now I use a samba4 server as a additional DC. Samba4 server system version: ubuntu 15.04 Samba version: samba 4.3.0 The replication from win2003 DC to samba4 DC was success. But have some problem from samba4 DC to win2003 DC. I can run samba-tool drs showrepl without error. But in log.samba it can found many message like: [2015/10/09 12:53:11.562088, 0]

OK, I had this working a few days ago, but have evidently changed something that I cannot locate. Someone hit me with their 2x4. Samba 3.0.22, Fedora Core 4, ldapsam (OpenLDAP 2.3.24). smbd will not start, with the "ERROR: failed to setup guest info" error (I have "guest account = guest", which is a valid user with correct info in LDAP): ldap_connect_system: Binding to ldap

Roland, Thank you very much for your attention to this. You should get a medal for all the help you give everyone on this list. On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > Why ? And why don't they show up when you ask for the zones with samba-tool ? I have that many subnets. As for why they don't show up: they are defined in BIND's configuration and not samba's; they never

Hello Lorenzo, please don't hijack foreign threads. ;-) Am 19.05.2014 19:17, schrieb Lorenzo Faleschini: > In my mind i figured out that what I want to achieve is done by: > - adding Samba4 machine to the domain as domain controller > - move all FSMO roles to the Samba4 DC (trough win RSAT) > - manually rsync SysVol (win2003-->Samba4)to get all the last changes > - demote