similar to: Need Help Getting Windows XP To Use Samba Properly[Closed]

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "Need Help Getting Windows XP To Use Samba Properly[Closed]"

2010 Dec 29
0
FW: Need Help Getting Windows XP To Use Samba Properly
Takahashi, thanks for your response. No antivirus software is installed, firewall disabled completely. I might have to go the sniffer route. But this is XP and Samba, both old products. I can't imagine that I'd be the first one to have such a ridiculous problem trying to get XP to be able to browse a Samba box. This is fresh WinXP right out of the box (with SP3) having this problem,
2010 Dec 28
17
Need Help Getting Windows XP To Use Samba Properly
Hi everyone, new to the list. My apologies if this issue has already been covered, but I am having the following problem with Samba: Using Windows XP as a client, I am trying to see a Solaris system as a server. Solaris is running Samba 2.4.2, and Windows 2000 sees it as a server without any problems. Windows XP, however, generates the error "The network name is no longer
2004 Jul 29
2
2003 KDC and Samba
We have serveral RHEL 3.0 Update 2 servers running Samba. These have been working flawlessly for several months.. Recently, the base upgraded all the Windows 2000 servers to Windows 2003.. NOTE: we don't have admin rights to the Domain Controllers.. (wish we did..) Previous to the Domain (and kdc) controllers to 2003 we had no issues joining a new Samba Sever to the ADS.. Using the same
2024 May 16
1
[Non-DoD Source] Re: R for the US Air Force
You described it well; I?m afraid that?s what it is. They want documents of an organization that doesn?t fit the description, and only then will they test it. That sounds great. I?ll reach out to Jeremy and see if he can help me get the IDs the USAF wants. It sounds like Joshua predates my time here. That?s a really good idea. Thanks very much! Doug From: Josiah Parry
2024 May 16
1
R for the US Air Force
Hey Doug, R is not a product that is provided by a company or any vendor that can be procured through a vendor e.g. something on a GSA schedule. Seems like you're caught in the bureaucracy hell hole. I used to help the USAF, and other DoD members use R when I was at RStudio (now Posit). I recommend you find someone in your organization who is doing Data Science. They'll likely have
2024 May 18
1
[External] Re: R for the US Air Force
R is not a product that is provided by a company or any vendor that can be > procured through a vendor e.g. something on a GSA schedule. > > that's not strictly true though is it? Anyone can form a company and supply R, as long as everyone complies with the license. You are also free to download R from public services and do it without any corporate wrappings and trappings, which is
2009 Dec 29
1
SUN_LIBUSB
Hi all, I've been trying to get a TrippLite 700DV communicating with nut in Solaris. The problem was that I would successfully send a message to the ups, but wouldn't be able to receive anything. After some snooping around I found this bit of code in libusb.c libusb_get_interrupt(). #ifdef SUN_LIBUSB /* usleep(timeout * 1000); */ return 0;
2010 Jan 12
1
Tripplite_usb
He everyone, I have a Tripplite SMART700DVa using the tripplite_usb from NUT 2.5 (rev 2217) driver running in Solaris 10x86. My driver hangs when trying to connect. Once the driver sends the watchdog command ("W\0"), it can no longer receive any signals and eventually exits. The UPS responds to other watchdog commands ("W5" for example), but there doesn't seem to be
2010 Aug 05
2
SAMBA and SMB Signing
Hello, We're working on setting up a SAMBA server, but it is not working. There is a standard configuration for our Windows Vista machines. With the previous configuration of Windows Vista ("Alice") it connects to the SAMBA fine. However, the latest Windows Vista configuration ("Bob") will contact the SAMBA server, send the required password then just stop communicating.
2010 Jul 08
0
YeeFreakingHa!
Samba4 latest on FreeBSD8.1RC2 built and running as a joined DC: 81rc2# pwd /usr/local/samba/sbin 81rc2# ps -ax | grep samba 92436 ?? Ss 0:00.24 ./samba 92437 ?? S 0:00.01 ./samba 92438 ?? I 0:00.04 ./samba 92439 ?? S 0:00.01 ./samba 92440 ?? S 0:00.00 ./samba 92441 ?? S 0:00.00 ./samba 92442 ?? S 0:00.00 ./samba 92443 ?? S 0:00.01 ./samba
2010 May 19
1
TR: RE : RE : RE : Example of command ". / Setup / provision"
-----Message d'origine----- De?: Viatte Fr?d?ric Envoy??: mercredi, 19. mai 2010 11:58 ??: 'Michael Wood' Cc?: tms3 at tms3.com; samba at lists.samba.org Objet?: RE: RE : [Samba] RE : RE : Example of command ". / Setup / provision" I solved this error, but I have another one now, here it is: Error occurred while starting named service. Error: / usr / local / samba /
2010 Mar 24
1
Tripplite USB 3003 problems
I have been having a few issues recently. I'm running Nut 2.4.3 on Solaris 10 (10/09) using a TrippLite SMART700DVa UPS. Everything seems to be working fine except for some random issues. During a power cycle (UPS online to offline to online) NUT will occasionally get disconnected from the UPS. A call to it using upsc results in "Error: Data stale". And running dmesg has the
2013 Jun 24
2
samba 4.0.6 getent group
Hello all listies. I've got samba4.0.6 running on FreeBSD 9.1. Joined W2K12 domain as member server. running getent group I noticed it takes a long time to resolve groups. The result is correct, but it is inordinately long. With 3.6.13 on FreeBSD 9.1 the return is nearly instantaneous. smb4.conf looks like this. [global] workgroup = TMS3 security = ADS realm = TMS3.COM encrypt
2010 Jun 11
2
Samba 4--Somethings decidedly broken
Hmmm...not quite sure where to go to fix this up. Samba 4 PDC, 1 W2K3R2, 1 W2K8R2 additional DC's. samba.log perpetually spewing: [Fri Jun 11 14:47:42 2010 PDT, 0 librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:619:dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv()] Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 - NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER [Fri Jun 11 14:47:42 2010 PDT, 0
2010 May 18
1
RE : Example of command ". / Setup / provision"
SNIP > > > How to know the NetBIOS name in Linux? Linux does not care. Only Windows cares. > > > > The name of my domain is: DOMAINE.CH > The name of my server: SERVEUR-TPI The posix name of the server does not matter. Nor does the DNS name as it can have more than one DNS name. You need to work with Samba as a somewhat separate entity. It is simply easier to match
2010 May 19
0
RE : RE : RE : Example of command ". / Setup /provision"
> > > I think that sends the image I walked, this is the first error: > > Naming Information Can not Be Located Because: > The specified domain does not exist or could not be contacted. > Contact your system administrator .... > > Error 2 > > The following domain controller could not be > contacted:SERVEUR-TPI.DOMAINE.CH. > Access denied Well, you do need
2010 May 18
5
RE : RE : Example of command ". / Setup / provision"
> > > I do not understand, I will have a hostname and NetBIOS name > different? Yes. > > > > So > > -- Domain = SAMBA > > it'll be my name NETBIOS, and > > -- Realm = TPI.DOMAINE.CH-SERVER > > will my machine name + my domain? > > Thank you > ________________________________ > De : tms3 at tms3.com [tms3 at tms3.com] > Date
2023 Dec 11
1
Base R wilcox.test gives incorrect answers, has been fixed in DescTools, solution can likely be ported to Base R
While using the Hodges Lehmann Mean in DescTools (DescTools::HodgesLehmann), I found that it generated incorrect answers (see <https://github.com/AndriSignorell/DescTools/issues/97> https://github.com/AndriSignorell/DescTools/issues/97). The error is driven by the existence of tied values forcing wilcox.test in Base R to switch to an approximate algorithm that returns incorrect results - see
2010 May 28
0
FW: smbd *not* breaking hard links when saving files
Hi Tim et al., Yes, I can see that the new behaviour would seem like an 'optimization', possibly especially for large files, in that it saves the unlink operation. was (quasi): unlink, open(write), write data, close now is (quasi): open(write, truncate), write data, close However, this old behaviour enabled my rather nice hard link copy (cheap!) local backup. The question is, is the
2010 Dec 16
0
Running a sleepy server (was: smbd on a battery-powereddevice)
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:43 PM, <tms3 at tms3.com> wrote: > > On Thursday 16/12/2010 at 2:33 pm, Liam wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:52 PM, <tms3 at tms3.com> wrote: > >> On Thursday 16/12/2010 at 1:36 pm, Liam wrote: >> >> ... >> >> And when an smb connection is active but the client is idle, does the >> client >> expect