similar to: Running a sleepy server (was: smbd on a battery-powereddevice)

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 12:37 -0800, Liam wrote: > > I'm setting up samba service on a battery-powered WiFi device. The > > plan is to have it wake-on-lan, handle request, sleep. Anyone have > > experience with this? > > > > Are there smb protocol aspects that preclude server

Hi Tim et al., Yes, I can see that the new behaviour would seem like an 'optimization', possibly especially for large files, in that it saves the unlink operation. was (quasi): unlink, open(write), write data, close now is (quasi): open(write, truncate), write data, close However, this old behaviour enabled my rather nice hard link copy (cheap!) local backup. The question is, is the

Samba4 latest on FreeBSD8.1RC2 built and running as a joined DC: 81rc2# pwd /usr/local/samba/sbin 81rc2# ps -ax | grep samba 92436 ?? Ss 0:00.24 ./samba 92437 ?? S 0:00.01 ./samba 92438 ?? I 0:00.04 ./samba 92439 ?? S 0:00.01 ./samba 92440 ?? S 0:00.00 ./samba 92441 ?? S 0:00.00 ./samba 92442 ?? S 0:00.00 ./samba 92443 ?? S 0:00.01 ./samba

TCL IS BETTER THAN RUBY. THIS MESSAGE WAS BROUGHT TO YOU BY IRC.GANGNET.RU #TCLMAFIA SHOUTZ TO RYAN ETERNAL PRESIDENT OF GNAA, MALCOM, FLUNITRAZEPAM, DUTCHMINATI, CRACK, SNITCH -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Hi, I'm having a grief with Seagate FreeAgent Pro drive connected to CentOS 4 box via USB. The problem is that drive is factory configured to take a nap (spin down) after some 15-20 minutes of inactivity, and there doesn't seem to be a way to disable it. Since it's USB connected, hdparm can't be used on it. Getting the drive out of the case is not an option either, since it

Hi all, I have a problem with a CentOS 4 and now updated to 4.1 server, every so often the other servers try to contact it and this not there a retry and it is, like it goes to sleep, I have no problem with the fedora1, RH9 and slackware machines they just never do this. its most annoying.. they all use IP's not names. all access lists are identical, all hosts files are identical, all

-----Message d'origine----- De?: Viatte Fr?d?ric Envoy??: mercredi, 19. mai 2010 11:58 ??: 'Michael Wood' Cc?: tms3 at tms3.com; samba at lists.samba.org Objet?: RE: RE : [Samba] RE : RE : Example of command ". / Setup / provision" I solved this error, but I have another one now, here it is: Error occurred while starting named service. Error: / usr / local / samba /

Hi All, I'm trying to migrate from an NT4 domain to samba-3... sorry this is so long... when I run the "net rpc vampire" I get errors for users and machines in uppercase or contain uppercase chars. I'm in a test env before I go live! I'm on a gentoo distro w/ shadow. useradd FOO errors, this might be the culprit... I set up some dummy accts and made them members of

Oops, forgot to put a subject... apologies for the repost... (newb!) > Hi All, > > I'm trying to migrate from an NT4 domain to samba-3... > sorry this is so long... > > when I run the "net rpc vampire" I get errors for users and machines > in uppercase or contain uppercase chars. > > I'm in a test env before I go live! > > I'm on a

Hello all listies. I've got samba4.0.6 running on FreeBSD 9.1. Joined W2K12 domain as member server. running getent group I noticed it takes a long time to resolve groups. The result is correct, but it is inordinately long. With 3.6.13 on FreeBSD 9.1 the return is nearly instantaneous. smb4.conf looks like this. [global] workgroup = TMS3 security = ADS realm = TMS3.COM encrypt

Unfortunately we're not able to install more software of radically change any configurations. We also do not use LDAP (just a workgroup, hosts file, static IPs and Samba). But those are good ideas, I'll keep them in mind just in case. Major thanks. :-) Bob -----Original Message----- From: tms3 at tms3.com [mailto:tms3 at tms3.com] Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:45 PM To:

Takahashi, thanks for your response. No antivirus software is installed, firewall disabled completely. I might have to go the sniffer route. But this is XP and Samba, both old products. I can't imagine that I'd be the first one to have such a ridiculous problem trying to get XP to be able to browse a Samba box. This is fresh WinXP right out of the box (with SP3) having this problem,

Hmmm...not quite sure where to go to fix this up. Samba 4 PDC, 1 W2K3R2, 1 W2K8R2 additional DC's. samba.log perpetually spewing: [Fri Jun 11 14:47:42 2010 PDT, 0 librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:619:dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv()] Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 - NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER [Fri Jun 11 14:47:42 2010 PDT, 0

SNIP > > > How to know the NetBIOS name in Linux? Linux does not care. Only Windows cares. > > > > The name of my domain is: DOMAINE.CH > The name of my server: SERVEUR-TPI The posix name of the server does not matter. Nor does the DNS name as it can have more than one DNS name. You need to work with Samba as a somewhat separate entity. It is simply easier to match

> > > I think that sends the image I walked, this is the first error: > > Naming Information Can not Be Located Because: > The specified domain does not exist or could not be contacted. > Contact your system administrator .... > > Error 2 > > The following domain controller could not be > contacted:SERVEUR-TPI.DOMAINE.CH. > Access denied Well, you do need

THIS IS systemctl list-units | grep UPS nut-driver at back-ups.service

> > > I do not understand, I will have a hostname and NetBIOS name > different? Yes. > > > > So > > -- Domain = SAMBA > > it'll be my name NETBIOS, and > > -- Realm = TPI.DOMAINE.CH-SERVER > > will my machine name + my domain? > > Thank you > ________________________________ > De : tms3 at tms3.com [tms3 at tms3.com] > Date

Thanks to both of you - exactly the piece I was missing. -----Original Message----- From: tms3 at tms3.com [mailto:tms3 at tms3.com] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 12:52 PM To: Christ Schlacta Cc: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Reestablishing trust with PDC > > > you haven't tried experimenting with backing up and restoring the > samba password cache. look in

Thanks TMS, that is not a major problem as of now.. i dont know why but i m facing many problems/errors while using samba :). now the major problem is wbinfo -g is not showing the full list. only few domain groups it is showing . do u have any idea about this ??? .please help On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:44 PM, <tms3 at tms3.com> wrote: > > > > --- Original message --- >

Guys, CentOS is not doing very well at this ranking site: http://www.distrorankings.com/ We need some good foo there, so if you like CentOS, go there and rank us ... {If you don't like CentOS then you are getting sleepy .... sleepy ..... You will not remember anything you read in this message} Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was