Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "ACL Problems with Samba and ADS Integration"
2020 May 04
2
Win7 clients problem after upgrading samba file server to 4.12 on Arch
This is the smbstatus with 4.11.x. No problems on clients.
Using LC_ALL=C because have Polish locale set up.
[root at arch1 ~]# LC_ALL=C smbstatus
Samba version 4.11.3
PID Username Group Machine
Protocol Version Encryption
Signing
2020 May 04
2
Win7 clients problem after upgrading samba file server to 4.12 on Arch
Forgot to add the tcpdump command used:
tcpdump -p -s 0 -n -w /root/tcpdump_all.txt
Pawel.
wt., 5 maj 2020 o 00:01 pavlos <pavlos.audiofreak at gmail.com> napisa?(a):
> OK, have repeated the test:
>
> - samba logs:
> http://www.mediafire.com/file/jy4qcyvqg6z39zu/logs.tar.gz/file
> - tcpdump log:
>
2020 May 04
2
Win7 clients problem after upgrading samba file server to 4.12 on Arch
@Andrew,
Samba master - what do you mean? A clean compile and install from genuine
samba.org sources? As a matter of fact, I was thinking about it....
Let me do the tests now, with tcpdump. Will send some logs and outputs
later on.
You've asked previously - this is the smbstatus, already on the latest
kernel/samba versions.
The problem is persistent, no wonder...
[root at arch1 /]#
2018 May 25
2
Fwd: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED for guest account to public share
Hi list,
I'm using samba-4.7.6-r0 and attempting to establish a public samba share
where any anonymous user can write to the share.
I have an issue where the 'guest' (uid 405) account is unable to write to a
directory owned by that uid. If the gid or world writable bits are set, I
can write to my share, but not as the guest uid. I need assistance
troubleshooting why I cannot write as
2015 Jun 13
4
idmap & migration to rfc2307
On 13/06/15 11:00, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
> On 13 June 2015 at 09:34, buhorojo <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 12 June 2015 at 08:55, Jonathan Hunter <jmhunter1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Sadly, even though sssd is now running and I'm no longer reliant on
>>> winbind, the rest of samba doesn't seem to be taking notice of these
>>>
2020 Apr 23
1
Samba 4.12 network share issue
Dear all,
I would need some help if we?re running in issues ?cause a wrong configuration of our shares, or it?s a bug in samba 4.12
On samba 4.11 we have no issues with our network shares when Windows Clients connect them.
After upgrade to 4.12 we run in to the issue that network shares which are mounted as drives per gpo not working well,
We get on windows when we try to open the network drive
2015 Jun 13
3
idmap & migration to rfc2307
On 13/06/15 16:33, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
> Hi buhorojo,
>
> I *think* I have a stable system for the moment... so thank you :-)
>
> On 13 June 2015 at 12:50, buhorojo <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I now set in smb.conf:
>>>
>>> server services = -dns +winbind -winbindd
>>>
>>> I stopped samba, then removed
2007 Jun 26
2
NFS, nested ZFS filesystems and ownership
Hello,
I''m sure there is a simple solution, but I am unable to figure this one out.
Assuming I have tank/fs, tank/fs/fs1, tank/fs/fs2, and I set sharenfs=on for
tank/fs (child filesystems are inheriting it as well), and I chown
user:group /tank/fs, /tank/fs/fs1 and /tank/fs/fs2, I see:
ls -la /tank/fs
user:group .
user:group fs1
user:group fs2
user:group some_other_file
If I mount
2003 Nov 07
13
File Locking
Hi,
I'm running smbd 2.2.8. I'm a little green when it comes to file locking
with samba.
I have two users that access a single data file on a FreeBSD box. It's a
moneydance data file and obviously it gets messed-up if two users are
writing to it at the same time. Is there a way with samba to stop a second
instance of the file from being opened, something like a "File In
2015 Jun 12
2
idmap & migration to rfc2307
Thanks buhorojo. The sssd list came up trumps here. When changing ID
mappings, the sssd database must be manually removed (rm
/var/lib/sss/db/*). I now have sssd working again :)
I shall keep an eye on the mappings during the day today..
On 12 June 2015 at 07:36, buhorojo <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/06/15 01:34, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 11 June 2015 at
2018 Oct 10
6
same netbios aliases on multiple servers
Hi
Can I set the same netbios name on multiple servers?
more precisely why it does not work?
server A
[global]
netbios name = FS1
netbios aliases = fs fs.example.ru
server B
[global]
netbios name = FS2
netbios aliases = fs fs.example.ru
2010 Jan 12
1
Unable to map the group
Hi All,
I am using Samba 3.2.11 on sles 10. I have create a Unix group 'grp1' and
mapped it to a ntgroup "Group One". Unix group 'grp1' has one user i.e
'usr1'. 'net groupmap' command show the mapping with correct SID and gid
value. Please, have a look here.
# cat /etc/group | grep grp1
grp1:!:12613:usr1,raj1,raj2
#
# net groupmap list
Group One
2003 Nov 12
1
strange behaviour
Hi folks
I hope someone might be able to shed some light on a problem that I am experiencing with
a Samba server. I installed this server about 2 and a half years ago on a client's site.
The server has been running fine. We are now experiencing two problems which according
to the client occured overnight.
The first problem started about a week and a half ago when they found that when trying
2016 Oct 22
5
CTDB and locking issues in 4.4.6 (Classic domain)
Hi Ralph,
I applied the patch to a new build of Sernet 4.4.6 SRPM. I could still
open the file from both hosts, and in fact this time I could actually
open it on the same host without any problems:
host 1:
smbclient -U ajc //172.31.0.120/ifa_v
...
smb: \jmi\Corporate Accounting\ISL Ltd Accounts\2016\1609\> open "201609
213_ ISL Balance sheet variance analysis.xls"
open file
2007 Sep 13
4
How to delegate filesystems from different pools to non-global zone
I''m trying to add filesystems from two different pools to a zone but can''t seem to find any mention of how to do this in the docs.
I tried this but the second set overwrites the first one.
add dataset
set name=pool1/fs1
set name=pool2/fs2
end
Is this possible or do I need to use different syntax?
-Robert
This message posted from opensolaris.org
2009 Sep 30
2
MySQL fails with tablespace on OCFS2
I have set up an cluster with ocfs2 on top of drbd in primary/primary mode.
As long as the datadir is in /var/lib/mysql, everything works fine.
But as soon as I put the datadir on the ocfs2 filesystem
/mnt/data/mysql
mysql fails with:
[Ubuntu] root at fs2:/etc# mysqld --safe-mode
090930 18:08:14 [Warning] Can't create test file
/mnt/data/mysql/fs2.lower-test
090930 18:08:14 [Warning]
2008 Sep 29
1
strang locking behaviour with macosx clients
I'm running a samba pdc on my gentoo box in a mixed environment with a
couple of Windows XP clients and only a few MacOSX clients. The users
told me, the file locking across the platforms does not work properly
sometimes.
I tried to google my problem, but without luck. I switched all the flags
related the lock mechanism of samba on and off, but the problem seems to
be solved yet.
The only
2011 Jan 17
8
[PATCH] sched: provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule()
For future rework of try_to_wake_up() we'd like to push part of that
onto the CPU the task is actually going to run on, in order to do so we
need a generic callback from the existing scheduler IPI.
This patch introduces such a generic callback: scheduler_ipi() and
implements it as a NOP.
I visited existing smp_send_reschedule() implementations and tried to
add a call to scheduler_ipi() in
2011 Jan 17
8
[PATCH] sched: provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule()
For future rework of try_to_wake_up() we'd like to push part of that
onto the CPU the task is actually going to run on, in order to do so we
need a generic callback from the existing scheduler IPI.
This patch introduces such a generic callback: scheduler_ipi() and
implements it as a NOP.
I visited existing smp_send_reschedule() implementations and tried to
add a call to scheduler_ipi() in
2011 Jan 17
8
[PATCH] sched: provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule()
For future rework of try_to_wake_up() we'd like to push part of that
onto the CPU the task is actually going to run on, in order to do so we
need a generic callback from the existing scheduler IPI.
This patch introduces such a generic callback: scheduler_ipi() and
implements it as a NOP.
I visited existing smp_send_reschedule() implementations and tried to
add a call to scheduler_ipi() in