similar to: Samba 3.5.6 and ACL patch

I have ACLs working for files with the following set in my share definitions: inherit permissions = yes inherit acls=yes map acl inherit=yes vfs_objects = acl_tdb While testing my Samba configuration, I found that permissions are being set to 'special' for directories being copied from Windows instead of the ACL being fully populated. Does Samba 3.6 fully implement ACLS, or are

Derek -----Original Message----- From: Michael Wood [mailto:esiotrot at gmail.com]=20 Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 12:43 PM To: Derek Lewis Cc: samba at lists.samba.org; Jeremy Allison; = samba-technical at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Problems with ACL jumbo patch Hi On 10 November 2010 10:22, Derek Lewis <dlewis at mtu.edu> wrote: > Okay, I search the apt repositories

When I upgrade a major revision (3.4.x -> 3.5.x ), I always get a listing from "testparm -v" before and after the upgrade to make sure that a parameter (that I didn't specify in the config) didn't change it's default setting. ---------------------------------------------- Tony Hoover, Network Administrator KSU - Salina, College of Technology and Aviation (785) 826-2660

I've got a very odd situation occurring. I recently upgraded to Samba 2.0.26a and now secondary group membership doesn't work. On the filesystem I have this layout /derek /derek/Folder 1 /derek/Folder 2 derek has these ACLs # file: derek # owner: root # group: root user::rwx group::r-x other:r-x Folder 1 has these ACLs # file: Folder 1 # owner: root # group: g1 user::rwx group:rwx

Okay, I selected the release-3-5-6 branch and applied the patch, then attempted to build. No errors so far. First question, how can I confirm that the patch was integrated with the branch? Second question, will this patch make all the updates that the original jumbo patch set was to? The patch/compile problems I am having are due to lack of knowledge. Not sure what the best forum

Hi, On Thu, November 17, 2016 10:51 am, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 09:57:47AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, November 17, 2016 4:11 am, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:07:15PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: >> >> I found the disk image for the running VM, created a symlink, and >> then

Hi All, Can someone help me in getting info about specific dtrace features introduced in individual S10 updates like U1,U2,U3 etc... This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi! I have few question to developers of VFS ACL modules (acl_tdb and acl_xattr): 1. Do you plan to extend quantity of entries in acl_tdb (now I can write 22 user ACLs plus CREATOR OWNER, CREATOR GROUP, domain users and everyone) 2. Do you plan to fix few ACLs eg. Traverse folder / Execute file (to traverse I need to enable additional permission List folder / read data to traverse through

GigE wasn''t giving me the performance I had hoped for so I spring for some 10Gbe cards. So what am I doing wrong. My setup is a Dell 2950 without a raid controller, just a SAS6 card. The setup is as such : mirror rpool (boot) SAS 10K raidz SSD 467 GB on 3 Samsung 256 MLC SSD (220MB/s each) to create the raidz I did a simple zpool create raidz SSD c1xxxxx c1xxxxxx c1xxxxx. I have

Hi, Hopefully some Samba gurus are interested in some of my questions about Samba ACL this is more in technical detail. 1. Why Samba always think the owner always has 'READ' access right on a file, 'READ and WRITE' access rights on a directory? I checked the code of posix_acls.c, those bits are OR-ed by default 2. Try to create a folder via the Samba Win2k

Hi, Anyone else noticing any TCP Stack requests for information under a useraccount with mild to moderate TCP activity on HTTP and other sorts of ports returns zero results back unless you are root. [site@Eden ~]$ netstat -i reports netstat: kvm not available: /dev/mem: Permission denied ifnet: symbol not defined [site@Eden ~]$ netstat -an [site@Eden ~]$ netstat -m 377/823/1200 mbufs in use

Hi, I am trying to optimize my gigabit network. I have two Intel 1000 MT Gigabit Server Adapters, which support Jumbo Frames -- as well as a Switch that supports Jumbo Frames. However, I am observing some strange behavior in my file transfers from Windows XP to Linux and I am wondering if it has anything to do with the way the Samba variables are set on my Linux box? The "strange

dovecot: Jan 14 12:25:49 Error: IMAP(xxxuser): file istream-limit.c: line 85 (_seek): assertion failed: (v_offset <= lstream->v_size) That error message is generated when squirrelmail 1.4.4-rc1 attempts to access this peculiar message partially quoted below. It doesn't happen (after copying the message to our testing account) accessing it through squirrelmail now. But it did. The

Hi Guys, I am attempting to configure AC:L's I have enabled it in smb.conf for my share and remounted my fs with acl enabled. However if I attempt to edit security permissions for the group "Domain Users" it creates two more group "CREATOR GROUP" and "CREATOR OWNER" and refreshes the security properties and then just resets the tick boxes i had selected. I

On 08. aug. 2018 22:30, Dante Colo wrote: > > If you add to vfs module to a share you also have to explicit add acl_xattr , that's what i do when i want to add another module and keep acl_xattr on the same share, if i'm not doing right way someone correct me . > I am already have 'vfs objects = zfsacl' set for my ZFS shares so acl_xattr does not help at all.

After successfully getting higher MTU to work on my Realtek NICs, I started testing the impact of higher MTU on file transfers using NFS exported ramdisk to ramdisk. The results were unexpected. The higher the MTU on the sending NIC, the lower the file transfer speed. I tested by using time cp to copy a 1GB file (In case compression might affect the results, so I dd the test file from the CentOS

Jorell, I installed the packages from your list and attempted to build with your configuration. I still get errors during build referring to swrap_close or nwrap_getgrnam. Also I did not use. /autogen.she, just config and make. Derek Derek

We are utilizing the xen hypervisor on nexenta with ISCSI as our method of communication with the guests (currently ubuntu but could be moving to centos). Obviously jumbo packet support would be nice to have. The last time I see that on the xen roadmap http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenRoadMap . Is there a canonical place that spells out if jumbo frames are now supported or still on the

Hi, On Thu, November 17, 2016 1:07 pm, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:06:48AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: >> Would you like a copy of the VMDK? If so I can figure out how to make >> it >> available to you (privately). > > I can certainly have a go. Can you post it on a website somewhere? Yep. I'll send you the URL privately. > Rich.

On Fri, January 23, 2015 12:54 pm, Patrick Flaherty wrote: >> >> I do have two centos 6.6 servers. With a "performance optimized" rsync I >> get an speed of 15 - 20 MB/s >> >> The options I use are: >> >> rsync -aHAXxv --numeric-ids --progress -e "ssh -T -c arcfour -o >> Compression=no -x" >> >> If I copy files by smb