similar to: getting error with setfacl

Hi, I am trying to install samba on the RHEL. The installation completes but after that I get the smbd dead message upon checking the status: [root@usps-dc1-pc12 share]# [root@usps-dc1-pc12 share]# service smb status smbd dead but pid file exists nmbd (pid 8078) is running... [root@usps-dc1-pc12 share]# The version of RHEL and samba are as follows:

Hi all I'm having some problems trying to configure ACLs from a Win2000 SP3 client. I'm running Samba 2.2.5 on kernel 2.4.18 (with acl + ext attr), Samba is compiled with acl support etc. Samba is configured with security=domain, and is running with local groups etc rather than thru winbind, I haven't been game enough to tread those waters yet. With the debug level set to 5

Hi, For some users I am trying to deny file access to our domain member servers, yet keeping their AD account for all other purposes, like email and ldap authorized clients. So I figured I removed the unix attributes from a user in ADUC, while keeping the rest. I expected that would make the user 'invisible' for the domain member (file) servers, while maintaining the account for

Hi all from last few days i got struct in problem.when i try to use setfacl command "setfacl -m u:himmat:r-- /ide2/asd" i get the error setfacl : /ide2/asd : operation not supported i also has mounted acl using -: "mount -f -o remount,acl / " Note: -f option is for force i am using red hat kernel 2.4.20-8 and acl-2.2.3-1 One more thing i have to ask whether acl utility

Hi, I have a Samba 4 AD DC running for which I now want to create a file share on it and control permissions through windows. I provisioned the domain with this command: samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive --function-level=2008_R2 --use-ntvfs My share definition in my smb.conf is as follows: [Shared] comment = Shared Files path =

Hi all, I have "FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Wed Jul 25" authenticating successfully against active directory via samba's winbindd(8). I need to manage samba shares via FreeBSD ACLs and CIFS ACLs. From my reading of setfacl(1) I should be able to set group permissions using the syntax of DOMAIN\group-name. For example: #setfacl -d -m g:"MYDOMAIN\mygroupname":rwx test

On btrfs, do the following ------------------ # su user1 # cd btrfs-part/ # touch aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rw- group::rw- other::r-- # su user2 # cd btrfs-part/ # setfacl -m u::rwx aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rwx <- successed to setfacl group::rw- other::r-- ------------------ but we

On 20.03.2015 02:14, muiz wrote: > Dear all, > > > I have a Centos 6 (64bit) server used for samba and ACL control. > There has a folder which a lot of user can access, when I add a new user's ACL, but failed, do you know how to resolve this problem? use xargs like in: |find . -name "*.pdf" -print0 | xargs -0 RUNACOMMAND robert | > > > [root at s1

muiz wrote: > Dear all, > > > I have a Centos 6 (64bit) server used for samba and ACL control. > There has a folder which a lot of user can access, when I add a new user's ACL, but failed, do you know how to resolve this problem? > > > [root at s1 abc]# getfacl /abc > # file: abc > # owner: root > # group: root > user::rwx > user:user01:--- >

Dear gluster team, I have installed glusterfs on my servers for the storage. Machine: x86_64-redhat-linux I have created volumes with rdma protocol for infiniband. I have mount with acl option on server and client. When I run setfacl for glusterfs mount point it works fine but when i do it for nfs mount it says. setfacl <dir> : operation not supported. The logs created in server are as

On 19-4-2016 9:18, Denis Cardon wrote: > Hi lists at merit.unu.edu, > >> I updated our servers to 4.2.11, and I have a problem, but I'm not sure >> if the problem is related to the update. > > I've had a call from a client yesterday who had issue with his copiers' > scan2folder feature after badlock samba file server upgrade. The > mount.cifs ntlm basic

Looks like that worked but the UIDs probably need to be mapped more appropriately - how do I take care of that? getent group "domain users" DOMAIN\Domain Users:*:100: Rich -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Rich Webb Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 9:05 AM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re:

On 19/12/14 01:33, Rich Webb wrote: > Please is there anyone who has an answer on why this might be happening? > Do I need some sort of sssd support or winbind or something? In the > wiki about setting up acl's it doesn't say anything about any other > requirements, only that you have to have acl support and xattr support > in your filesystem which I do. > > I'm

What's the content of your /etc/nsswitch.conf? Am 19. Dezember 2014 14:22:56 MEZ, schrieb Rich Webb <rwebb at zylatech.com>: >Matt, > >Thanks for the reply. I'm not trying to add the "users" group. I'm >trying to add the "Domain Users" group. That is the reason for the \ >in >front of the space. It's translated as a literal. I think

On 19/12/14 13:40, Rich Webb wrote: > Running CentOS 6.6 > Using the Sernet Enterprise packages - sernet-samba-ad. > > Just tried: > > getent group "Domain Users" > getent group DOMAIN\\Domain\ Users > > and neither command returned any entries. > > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org >

I just tried that and I got the same error. I think there is some extended acl support that I'm missing somewhere. It's like the setfacl command is not recognizing the AD groups as valid groups. I should also add the following information: This server is built up on CentOS 6.6 Minimal using the Sernet-Samba Enterprise packages. It looks like the binary that is running is

Hi, How many user's you have assigned on that directory? --Regards Ashishkumar S. Yadav On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:30 AM, muiz <muiz at 163.com> wrote: > Hi, James, > The file system is xfs (/dev/mapper/centos-home xfs 1891292900 > 1556745108 334547792 83% /home) > > > Thanks and best regards, > Muiz > > At 2015-03-23 19:36:02, "James

On 19/12/14 13:22, Rich Webb wrote: > Matt, > > Thanks for the reply. I'm not trying to add the "users" group. I'm > trying to add the "Domain Users" group. That is the reason for the \ in > front of the space. It's translated as a literal. I think I could also > put quotes around it and not have to use the \ and the space. > > The

On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:06:34 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 06:16:42 +0000 (UTC) > barani tharan <aru_barani at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Dear Rowland Penny > >  I follow your mentioned step still i am face the same problem > > I have 1 Domain Controller [sambadc] and 1 Domain member for Samba > >

Hi there I am wondering if we can use before_filter in the form of :action OR :action what i want to do is to implement one of the actions, if the first failed, then go to the second when i use before_filter :action1 before_filter :action2 each method will run them, my case is that i want to check if one of them is true and not both any idea?