similar to: pam_smb and 3.4.x

Version 1.0 of my CIFS based NT authentication system for PAM is available from http://www.csn.ul.ie/~airlied/pam_smb/pam_smb-1.0.tar.gz or ftp://ftp.csn.ul.ie/pub/linux/pam/pam_smb/pam_smb-1.0.tar.gz This release has now gotten GNU configure support and should work reliably on Linux RH4.2, RH 5.0 and Solaris 2.6.... If anyone has another platform with PAM could they try it out ... It is also

I am appending some documentation by my colleague Bill Eldridge that was actually written for our dial-up service, but should work for you purposes as well. A couple notes. 1.)The user must exist in /etc/passwd on the Samba machine or login to the Samba box will fail. 2.)In the example, we don't set up home directories for the users, we are using it for dial in and they usually want to

I have an interresting situation that I am searching for a solution. I want to use pam_smb for authenticating SSH connections to a remote server. The Domain Controller I want to authenticate against is a Win NT 4.0 box located on our internal lan. An idea was given to me to set up an SSH tunnel and forward the relative ports across the internet to a local machine. All of my machines are RedHat

In integration of Documentum Sever with Active Directory, the instructions point to pam_smb package version 1.9.8 that can be found on the Samba FTP site. How do I get pam_smb version 3.x? _________________________________________ Mehrdad Khoshand 8111 Gatehouse Rd. Falls Church, VA 22042 Phone: 703.289.2199 / Fax: 703-289-2995

Hello. I've got a Samba server and I'd like it to be master browser and everything else except domain controller (the customers wants a workgroup, not a domain). Lately a Windows 2003 server was added to the net and then I guess it was removed. I keep getting messages like the following in the logs: > Apr 10 03:07:51 apocalypse nmbd[57552]: [2005/04/10 03:07:51, 0]

Several different PAM modules relating to Samba exist. The ones I could find were as follows: pam_smb http://www.csn.ul.ie/~airlied/pam_smb/ Authenticates against an NT domain controller, without joining the domain. (Doesn't work with Active Directory.) pam_ntdom http://www.cb1.com/~lkcl/pam-ntdom/ Based on the above, authenticates against an NT domain. Requires the client to be added to

Hello, > I have the following entries, among others, in my smb.conf file: > ===== cut here ===== > logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U > [profiles] > comment = User Profiles > path = /usr/home/profiles > public = yes > writable = yes > browseable = yes > ===== cut here ===== > So, I expect 'net use z: /home' on a win95 machine to map z: to >

Just as a point I recently upgraded an old sun server here from samba 1.9.16p11 I think to a similiar 1.9.18p8 and with the old one I only had to enter my password once and with the new one it was multiple times .. Anyways this question is better off on the smba main list I think than here ... which is for NTdomain controller stuff mainly .. Dave. On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, Dave Kirkby wrote: > I

________________________________ From: Uday Mhatre<mailto:uday_mhatre at hotmail.com> Sent: ?05-?12-?2014 12:58 To: Andrea Venturoli<mailto:ml at netfence.it> Subject: RE: [Samba] samba 2.2.7a tech issue Just wondering if these samba versions are backward compatible with fedora14 and other Linux distributions. Regards, Uday ________________________________ From: Uday

Just I missed the correct IPv6 PTR record from the DNS.                                     Ok and whats obligated for a correct working kerberos environment. Ahh.. Yes... dns A and PTR records. ;-) so one thing fixed thats ok..     The PC, ( ipconfig /all ) looks good now.     Next.. your hosts files... > my /etc/hosts: > > # IPv4 and IPv6 localhost aliases >

Hi Achim, Thanks a lot for your reply. > I remember this error. In my case the pc tried to connect to the gpo > share not via the server name but via the domain name. In your case > ad.cyberdyne.local. Well, I am even able to browser the policies via the domain name: \\ad.cyberdyne.local\sysvol\ad.cyberdyne.local\Policies Or via hostname:

On 2/17/19 8:18 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Possible things to check: > Is the ip for vlan1 10.1.2.34 ? Sure. It's the only IP vlan1 has inside the jail; it's shown as an alias on the base host. > Try just setting 'vlan1' You mean change "interfaces=vlan1 10.1.2.34/24" to just "interfaces=vlan1"? It doesn't change anything (still

----------------------- This e-mail is generated by Skynet Mail Protection to warn you that the e-mail sent by samba@lists.samba.org to vincent.brabant@skynet.be is infected with virus: Win32/Mydoom.A@mm. Deze e-mail is gegenereerd door Skynet Mail Protection om u te waarschuwen dat de e-mail gestuurd door samba@lists.samba.org naar vincent.brabant@skynet.be geinfecteerd is met Win32/Mydoom.A@mm.

Perhaps I am on the wrong track but I would like to share some additional observations... I quickly enabled DNS query logging: # rndc querylog Then run another gpupdate on the client. During the Update I see lots of queries: 04-Aug-2016 14:46:58.414 queries: info: client 10.0.1.186#59270 (_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.ad.cyberdyne.local): view internal: query:

Hello. I had a FreeBSD 7 box with Samba 3.0.x and I upgraded to 3.4.8. Everything seemed to be working fine, until I discovered that, at logoff, roaming profiles could not be copied back to the server: the client side error translates to "Insufficient resources". I've verified that on XP clients. A quick search pointed to full_audit, so I tried disabling it and everything

Hello Louis, Thanks for your reply. > No, your output is not good. So let's have a look. > >C:\Temp>netdom verify cyb64w10-monster > >The format of the specified computer name is invalid. > Thats not good. Well, it quite clearly states the format is invalid. If I use the the FQDN of the AD domain it works fine. The DNS search is also including the AD domain as

Am 09.08.2016 um 20:48 schrieb Rainer Meier via samba: > I have no idea at all why Samba still resolves to 10.0.0.6 as it does > not listen on this interface. Yes this inteface exists and 10.0.0.0/24 > is used on a dedicated physical network interface. But I don't want > Samba to listen on it and the interfaces line (see above) does not > list it. Netstat confirms Samba does

>I actually also thought Windows does not care > about > case sensitivity and for hostnames by default it shouldn't matter. Thats correct but if windows is buggy.. Source : https://support.microsoft.com/nl-nl/kb/2891966 It was worth a try.. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2954031 for the status rapport error, one you can check also. I see still something incorrect

I know this might be half OT, but nontheless Samba is involved. A customer of mine has two Macs with Mac OS X 10.5 and is sharing a folder on one of them. We'd like to avoid any permission problem, so I put the followinf in smb.conf: create mode=0777 force create mode=0777 directory mode=0777 force directory mode=0777 This is usually enough to achieve what I want, with other OSes.

Hello. I'm in need of some help to shed some light on a strange problem. The box is running Samba 4.1.7 on FreeBSD 9.2/amd64 and I suspect (though I'm not sure) all troubles started after the upgrade from 4.1.6. The setup is quite simple: no AD, no LDAP, only one server. A command as simple as "smbclient -U user //SERVER/SHARE", if fired up several times in a row on the