similar to: samba 3.4.7 as NT4 domain member and win9x

My Question: ------------ Is it possible to get 2-way Interdomain Trust relationships working between a Samba domain and an NT4 SP6a domain, while restricting all password hashes to NTLMv2 only? Everything works except the inter-domain trust I'm able to get the NT4 domain to trust the Samba domain, but not the other way around. My System: ---------- I have a perfectly running Samba domain

I have a number of Samba servers on RHEL (Samba 3.0.33) in an AD environment using a mix of Windows 2008 and windows 2008 R2 servers. Configuration file is pretty minimal: [global] workgroup = AVWORLD security = DOMAIN log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log max log size = 500 wins server = 10.50.4.31 dns proxy = no #log level = 10 log level = 3 passdb:5 auth:10

Hello, I'm running Mandrake 9.2 and Samba-3.0.2a I'm connecting a Samba Server as a Domain member to an 2003 ADS, called TEST2. I've been able to create the computer account. I've also tested successfully, from Chapter 7 of ' Samba HOWTO Collection' with a W2K client logon/mount a share from the samba server using Kerberos. The testing of the smbclient was also

Hello, guys. I?d like to upgrade our Samba 4.11 AD to 4.12. In release notes, REMOVED FEATURES, I see this: ?Retiring DES encryption types in Kerberos. ------------------------------------------ With this release, support for DES encryption types has been removed from Samba, and setting DES_ONLY flag for an account will cause Kerberos authentication to fail for that account (see RFC-6649).? In

Hi team, Upgraded samba from 4.7.x to 4.9.3, when i tried to connect my public share using smb://ip/ through guest login in MAC my shares are not listed if i am connected to AD. 2019/01/03 18:56:31.351985, 3, pid=1114, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=auth] ../source3/auth/auth.c:192(auth_check_ntlm_password) check_ntlm_password: mapped user is: []\[GUEST]@[HS-MBP-3] [2019/01/03

Hi, since today some users can not login to my member fileserver. in logs i got this error: [2016/10/10 11:31:28.920022, 10, pid=3809, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=auth] ../source3/auth/auth_sam.c:75(auth_samstrict_auth) Check auth for: [oliver.werner] [2016/10/10 11:31:28.920051, 6, pid=3809, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=auth] ../source3/auth/auth_sam.c:88(auth_samstrict_auth)

Running Samba mostly on Redhat 5 with version 3.5.4-0.83 Also failed on Debian 3.5.6 and Solaris with a 3.5 version. Logging details here are from Redhat case. We have a similar problem on all Unix/Linux systems using ADS as the backend authentication for samba shares on Unix/Linux. It was working before today and we didn't change anything. Today, any time we try smbclient or a Windows drive

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear List, Few days ago I've posted, that my Win9x boxes are unable to get the list of domain users and groups from samba-3.0.0 server (for details see bug 596). Unfortunately the same is true for samba-3.0.1pre1. Please people also having win9x boxes and Samba3 PDC confirm that it is a bug, or a configuration error. Thanks for any suggestion.

Hi all, I have two systems using Win98 and one using Win95. These three systems do not automatically execute their login scripts. I can map the network drives manually and tell them to reconnect at login, but I am wondering why they don't execute them. I can log in, browse to my netlogon share (if I make it browseable), and execute the script manually, and it works. Well, it mostly

I have an NT domain on Debian Stretch. It's been upgraded numerous times, but has been running for almost a decade. Since upgrading from 4.1.17 to 4.3.3 (huge Debian jump), then to 4.3.6, clients cannot connect to shares. Prior to upgrading, I found the changes mentioned for 4.2 regarding NT domains and applied them. Even so, I still cannot connect to network shares nor print to

Hi all, I've been trying to mount partitions on a UNIX machine behind a firewall on a Windows machine. This works fine inside the firewall, but from outside I need to tunnel through it using SSH. I can get this to work from a DOS window on the Windows machine by forwarding port 139, but when I try to access a file from the GUI, I get a "bad directory" error on windows. An

Hi all, In trying to upgrade Samba here, I have built various versions from 3.0.11 to 3.0.14a using various versions of gcc and the Sun compiler (this is on Solaris SPARC) and had the following problem in all cases. Running the built samba as a logon server, I find that WinXP clients work fine but Win9X clients have some difficulties. The problem is that the Win9X logon script can't

Hi all, I have a domain member server 3.6.6 running on debian7, authenticating against another debian7 + samba 3.6.6 in DC-mode. Both servers have user-accounts and groups on LDAP and resolve posix users using libnss-ldap. The groupmap is living on LDAP as well. The domain member server serves a share with ACL enabled. I got the upgrade to 3.6.X and idmap-updates working, but the old

> -----Original Message----- > From: G?mes G?za [mailto:geza@kzsdabas.sulinet.hu] > > I've configured for testing pruposes an other PDC with tdbsam backend, > and found, that with this backend win9x clients could get > user and group > list, while with ldapsam I had no success in it. Quite strange in my > opinion:-( Same problem here too. In 9x the userlist is

I am wondering if anyone has ever answered the question of group policy operability under Windows 9x. That is, I am _not_ looking for a work-around but the real thing--one config.pol file to service several groups. I have done my homework, hopefully well, but found nothing. To prove this, I will quickly summarize my findings below. Either I have found: 1. a list of unresolved (mostly

trying to get one server to mount.cifs a share on another and when it failed I used smbclient and it lead me into this oddity and I just can't seem to reason my way through. so you can skim better in case this is too much info: the mystery: why does command #3 work from server1 against itself, but fail for all other clients? server1: samba 3.4.7 (Ubuntu 10.04 server), NT4 domain member

I'm a bit confused about user enumeration on Win9x boxes. I've got a couple of machines running SaMBa. One (M2Dual) is running 2.0.7 with security = domain and domain server = M2Hub. The other (M2Hub) is running 2.2.3a with security = user. I also have three Win9x machines. All have user level security turned on. Roving profiles work on all machines and all users. Logon scripts run

I want to install a linux samba server to serve 30 win9x machines. I want to prevent users from writing on the local drives, they should have write access only to their home dirs on the samba box. These users have a nasty habit of deleting crucial system files. Is it at all possible with win9x and samba? Of course NT workstations could resolve the problem, but that's not an option with these

Hi All, Is there a way (speak command/wsh script) that allows a win9x workstation that is logged into a samba domain server (running onlinux for example) to see from the workstation what owner a certain file or directory has? Under win2k the "dir /q" command does this adequately. And if this is possible, is it then possible for someone to change the ownership of a file to another

I have added the line time server = Yes to my smb.conf file. All my win2k machines can do a net time \\servername /set an answer yes an the time is set to what is on samba server. Now the win9x machines will not do it. gives me an error # 2103, the server you specified can not be found. Is this a problem with win9x machines or do i need to do something else to get the time to be set from the