similar to: Replicating Windows Inheritance

Hi all I'm looking for some help on winbind/idmap for a new host The debian version is new on this host : debian 10 buster so samba is > root at homedir10:~# samba --version > Version 4.9.5-Debian We want to use security=ads so we join this host to the domain No problem for windows clients : they can mount shares that are accessible to their primary unix group and secondary unix

Hi, I?m running a samba 4.0.16 under Debian Squeeze 6.0.9, i?ve noted under standalone role mode file transfer on shares is almost twice as fast compared to AD DC mode for big and small files .Settings for the shares when was testing under standalone mode was exactly the same, any suggestions ? root at pdc:~# testparm Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf rlimit_max: increasing

Hi, I can not get the inheritance the way I want. My goal is, (1) to create a new Set of ACLs at directory "HERE" and (2) "set" the Windows checkbox "Replace all child object permission entries with inheritable permission entries from this object" My command looks like: smbcacls //mynas/share1 some/path/HERE

It seems not many folks have much to say about this. Here?s an update for anyone in a similar situation: We narrowed down the issue to being with dispersed volumes. When we created a replicated volume, vfs_fruit worked without issue. Ultimately, what we were seeking was performance. Even for our Windows and Linux users, things could be slow. The good news is that we discovered an SMB config

Hello Anoop. Thanks for helping with this! > On Sep 22, 2017, at 00:11, Anoop C S <anoopcs at autistici.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 10:35 -0600, Terry McGuire wrote: >> Hello list. I?m attempting to improve how Samba shares directories on our Gluster volume to Mac >> users by using the vfs_fruit module. > > What versions of GlusterFS and Samba have

Hi Rowland! I've uninstalled the samba packages and their dependencies, and now the error is: Nov 24 23:29:16 testdc1.mytestdom.testsamba.com named[9501]: samba_dlz: Failed to connect to /usr/local/samba/private/dns/sam.ldb Nov 24 23:29:16 testdc1.mytestdom.testsamba.com named[9501]: dlz_dlopen of 'AD DNS Zone' failed Nov 24 23:29:16 testdc1.mytestdom.testsamba.com named[9501]: SDLZ

On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:38:54 +0530 venkat ramu <ramut123 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Please find the attached requested details. also Could you please > share right document for the SAMBA configuration with AD > authentication for file server. Thank you the help. > > Thanks, > Venkat OK, you have a choice here, you can either do what I do, which is make

On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 at 20:45, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > That is what I was looking for, the default 'idmap config' is set to > 'hash', which shouldn't be used. Especially as it says 'idmap_hash - DO > NOT USE THIS BACKEND' at the top of 'man idmap_hash'. I can understand > using it for existing

Hi, I read at least 100 different documentations during the last week and didn't get it. So I decided to ask the list for help :) Unfortunately we have to move to a Windows 2008 Server ADS in our company as this is required for some other projects. But we want to keep our nice 5+ samba-server providing fast 50TB+ of storage. So we have to find a way to nicely integrate the storage with the

Hi List! Im trying to switch from using the samba internal dns to bind. Im running a self-compiled samba 4.7.1 pair of DCs on Centos 7.2. After following the steps in the wiki, named refuses to start with this error: ● named.service - Berkeley Internet Name Domain (DNS) Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/named.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled) Active: failed (Result:

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:31:46 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I assumed that the rearranged config you provided was for feedback, Yes, they were just comments, but unraid should really fix their Samba setup. > I > haven't made any changes to the configuration based on those > comments. I'll send a message to the Unraid

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 22:11:17 +0100 Sina Owolabi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi List! > > Im trying to switch from using the samba internal dns to bind. > Im running a self-compiled samba 4.7.1 pair of DCs on Centos 7.2. > > After following the steps in the wiki, named refuses to start with > this error: > > ● named.service - Berkeley Internet

Hi Rowland! Yes there are samba packages installed: [root at testdc1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep samba samba-client-libs-4.6.2-11.el7_4.x86_64 samba-winbind-modules-4.6.2-11.el7_4.x86_64 samba-common-libs-4.6.2-11.el7_4.x86_64 samba-common-4.6.2-11.el7_4.noarch samba-common-tools-4.6.2-11.el7_4.x86_64 samba-libs-4.6.2-11.el7_4.x86_64 And there are seven zones because of /etc/named.rfc1912.zones: //

I've been fighting with this for a while, and I can't get it to work, so I'd like to know if it's even possible! I've got two subnets .3.x and .4.x which are routed via a dual-homed Linux box. The .3.x subnet is the main company network, and runs an domain BLUETREE. The two domain controllers are also WINS servers. All machines in this network are domain members. The .4.x

Sorry if config was messy, we were using this server for various tests including ADS tests and n-way master replication. Back on topic, I've done changes to configuration as you suggested. Runing debian as standalone server with beforementioned enviroment I can still copy files between shares on the same pool without pushing them through Windows client. Is this intended behavior? cat

> > There is no one supporting the use of sssd with Samba, not even Red Hat. > > Now that I know what to look for (thank you, Roland!), I found https://access.redhat.com/solutions/3802321 page explaining how to properly bridge between SSSD and winbind. In essence, the following configuration is in place (copy-pasting main parts of the document for the benefit of those who has no RHEL

On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 at 10:51, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I rearranged the smb.conf above and added comments: > > [global] > netbios name = Tower > server string = Media server > security = USER > workgroup = WORKGROUP > bind interfaces only = yes > interfaces = 192.168.66.10/24 127.0.0.1 > > # we don't do

On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 12:25:16 +0200 Adam Błaszczykowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > Server-Side Copy Offload wiki page states in Limitations section that > > - Both source and destination files must reside on the same Samba > share! > > I was able to copy file between different shares located on the same > zfs Pool without

Hello Rowland, thanks, configuring the uidNumber and gidNumber on the AD fixed the issue, now getent passwd works. I just have one remaining issue, it seems the ACL doesn't work. As an example when I set ACL with full permission for user andrea: # /usr/bin/ls -ldV /cache/testsamba/ d---------+  3 root     root           5 Jun 19 19:40 /cache/testsamba/            

On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:53:38 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > Issue Description > After the upgrade of the Unraid server OS (unraid.net) from v6.9.2 to > v6.12.6 (which upgrades the version of Samba from 4.12.14 to 4.17.12) > access to shares stops working. > > Error Summary: > [2024/01/07 21:52:43.357676, 0, pid=93992,