similar to: samba version to use on CentOS?

From the smb.conf manpage, it says that an 'include <file>' will include that file into smb.conf as if it were typed in place. Yet, I have a setup where: /etc/samba/smb.conf contains: [global] <various global parameters> include /etc/samba/smb.conf.local and then /etc/samba/smb.conf.local contains my share definitions. I'm doing it

I have a system that I'm vetting as a NAS server. It has a 2.0TB XFS filesystem mounted on /storage and I'm doing benchmarks using nfs3, nfs4, and samba. I'm testing via iozone by mounting the filesystem from my "nas client" box and then running iozone on the mounted filesystem. NFS seems pretty fast - ie, several orders of magnitude faster than samba, and I'm

Good morning all, I really hate emailing lists, but I've come to a wall that I just cant work out how to get past at the moment, so am hoping for some community assistance if possible. Some background: We are running Windows Server 2003 on all of our domain controllers, and are in the middle of migrating to server 2008 R2. We have unix exentions enabled (rfc2307 I believe), and manage

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hi All, I am new to the samba-technical list. I am currently adopting the way Samba does for mutual authentication using Kerberos to MS Active Directory 2003. Basically, I am using this "static ADS_STATUS ads_sasl_gssapi_bind (ADS_STRUCT *ads) " in my LDAP client implemented by Netscape Directory SDK. However, the code works fine with Windows 2000 but fails on 2003. By running the

Good morning! I'm reviewing some corporate storage setups involving NetApps, where the NetApp stores what they call "UNIX Qtrees". So far, so good: those allow the setting of access to the data with NFS4 ACL's, which are fairly sophisticated and allow multiple groups or even multiple users to be granted write access.or read access, besides the normal UNIX group owner. That works

Hi Folks, I've fresh installed CentOS 5.5 and realized, that Samba is in version 3.0.33-3. Is it possible to conect WIN7 in a Samba-Dom?ne with this version? And I've read abaut RHEL 5.6 with samba 3.5.4. Can I expect, that this version is included in CentOS 5.6? And can I get this version with yum-update? Thx Timothy

My customer has a Centos Linux 5.10 server running Samba 3. (Samba version 3.0.33-3.40.el5_10) The machine is about three years old. I suggested that they should consider replacing it with a Centos 6 machine and Samba 4, but they decided as it was doing its job without any issues to keep it as is. I also suggested updating to samba3x but they decided not to do this. I recently installed a centos

Good afternoon/morning/evening everyone, I've been running into the problem of clients using Windows 7 with CentOS 5.X and file/printer sharing. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the stand samba-3.0.33-x.x.x packages DO NOT provide compatibility with Windows Vista/7. I've had to manually compile samba from source or use the samba3x packages to fix the problem. Just wondering if we're

In the course of upgrading from CentOS 5.4 to CentOS 5.5 I changed from using the samba (v3.0.x) packages to the samba3x (v3.3.8) packages, mostly because the newer version was said to better support Win7. The Samba server services Linux, WinXP, and Win7 clients. Now I get many, many errors logged to the Samba logs shortly after 3:00 AM, but only from the Win7 clients. I get roughly 430

I've been running samba on RHEL5 for the past couple of years with XP clients. Late last year, in order to support new Win7 clients, I upgraded from samba-3.0.33 packages to samba3x-3.3.8 (from the Red Hat-managed configuration tree) and after some struggles got everything working. But now after upgrading to samba3x-3.5.4 I am only able to connect as a known user and not as a guest. Relevant

Dear all May be this question asked earlier in list but i didn't able to search exact . I have samba+ldap domain setup on RHEL 5.1 and samba version is 3.0.28. Today i got a windows 7 system , but i am not able to join that system in our samba+ldap domain. Do i need to do any registry tweaking. I can't upgrade own samba version beyond 3.0.33 because this maximum version i get if i update

Hi, recently I got my samba/ldap/pdc setup up and running with xp clients. Server: centos 5.5, openldap-2.3.43-12 and samba3x-3.3.8. The new challenge: adding Windows 7 Clients and upgrading to samba 3.3.x I followed a posting from the centos forum (1) which worked so far for the samba update breaking nothing for xp. Than I installed a windows 7 client with the latest patches, changed the

Hi all About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1 server with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site. Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a new location. As I would normally do I checked for Centos updates and found 35 outstanding including samba3x 3.6.23-12.el5_11 and samba3x-client, samba3x-common, samba3x-doc, samba3x-domainjoin-gui,

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0698 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0698.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: faa58b13a65533c118e9ac87e8fa4d31 libtalloc-1.2.0-52.el5_5.2.i386.rpm b80ab40b83e91b8574042b910fbfed69 libtalloc-1.2.0-52.el5_5.2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0488 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0488.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 2e1f8e51092cdd08edb08bcd68b0de84 libtalloc-1.2.0-52.el5_5.i386.rpm f6c6d3cc9eea46ce0df89411361e0d03 libtalloc-devel-1.2.0-52.el5_5.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0488 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0488.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: a95eee731386c97157f85c10c1a5bc6e libtalloc-1.2.0-52.el5_5.x86_64.rpm bfe687a7ce45a7aea4d3488bdd323ffc libtalloc-devel-1.2.0-52.el5_5.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0698 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0698.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 6503b6b291bd78f5f7b46e4c9cf990c5 libtalloc-1.2.0-52.el5_5.2.i386.rpm 4731ba6805281b11252a74423bafb8e2 libtalloc-devel-1.2.0-52.el5_5.2.i386.rpm

On 20/06/16 19:53, Dale Schroeder wrote: > On 06/17/2016 4:31 PM, peter lawrie wrote: >> Hi all >> About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1 >> server >> with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site. >> Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a new location. As I would >> normally do I checked for Centos

Hi, Situation: I'm seeing lots (~500k per day) of log entries like: smbd[13939]: itlab-pc06 (::ffff:10.51.51.103) couldn't find service it261 In this case, the last character of the request is truncated - it should be it2610 I'm seeing the same/similar issue to http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-March/147277.html I've dismissed this over the last few weeks as a minor