similar to: help with user permissions

HI my name ins Ben.T.George i am new to samba and active directory integration my machine ins Sun Slaris SPARC (solaris 10). the unix side samba and all deps are installed...from this link http://www.sunfreeware.com/programlistsparc10.html#samba now i want to sync samba with active directory.. so please help to for this.. please provide me the step by step for this.. now i am stuck with

Hi! I'm kinda new, so i'm wondering how should i configure [homes] section, so only two of many users (e.g. "user1" and "user2") could see it shared in network (so only those users could access their homes)? thanks in advance, andrej

Could someone help me understand if what I'm seeing with share access is correct? On my samba domain I have two users (user1 and user2) and one share; the share has attribute "writelist = user1". On a linux machine I: mount the share with "mount -t cifs -o username=user1" successfully open a file in the share for writing with the perl "open" function

Hi , I needed to apply this patch to get the GCC frontend building on an FC5 x86 box . [ramana at venglathur gcc]$ svn diff Index: libiberty/strsignal.c =================================================================== --- libiberty/strsignal.c (revision 254) +++ libiberty/strsignal.c (working copy) @@ -557,8 +557,8 @@ void psignal (signo, message) - unsigned signo; -

Hi Evan, The commit http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20060327/033389.html broke CVS. The attached obvious patch fixes it. I don't have write access . So can someone commit this in ? ramana at zirakzigil:~/fsf/llvm/llvm/lib/Target/X86$ cvs diff -au X86ISelLowering.cpp Index: X86ISelLowering.cpp ===================================================================

Hi , I've been giving the ARM port of LLVM a spin today and ran into this . [ramana at venglathur builddir]$ cat hello.c && llvm-gcc hello.c -c -emit-llvm -O3 -o - | llc -march=arm #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { printf ("hello world\n"); return 0; } llc: bytecode didn't read correctly. llvm and the tools is today's CVS head while llvm-gcc is

Devang, On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 10:28 -0800, Devang Patel wrote: > On Jan 24, 2007, at 4:14 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > > > Hi , > > > > I needed to apply this patch to get the GCC frontend building on an > > FC5 > > x86 box . > > I am curious, what kind of failure are you seeing ? I should have mentioned in the email : Here's my earlier post

hi all, i have integrated SAMBA with active directory and everthing is working . however in share defination i want to give write permissions to few users and read access to few users. i have mentioned write list and read list in samba config file as follows. this is working but all other known users (domain users) are getting read access . is there any way to restirct the same :( . this

i am trying to setup our hp unix server with samba 2.2.5 to authenicate via our ad user directory. Our NT structure is setup as follows: Active directories in mixed mode - 6 domain controllers one BDC here is a copy of my samba.conf # Samba config file created using SWAT # from ws00478.rbinc.com (10.27.52.184) # Date: 2002/10/04 08:38:08 # Global parameters [global] client code page = 437

I've got an issue with roaming profiles with samba 3.0.23a and an LDAP backend. I can use the ldap to authenticate an NT and a local user, and I know alot about PAM, NSS, and general linux. BUT, I can't get ANY roaming profiles to work. Other than my domain name changed for security purposes, the following is my smb.conf file. (I first used SWAT, then did more customization)

Hi all, We've been trying to setup/upgrade a samba PDC (version 3.56) with OpenLDAP as backend and roaming profiles for Windows7 (32bit) Clients. windows7 has no problem with login after applying the reg patches, however, it seems to always load a temporary profile as opposed to roaming one for users, no local profile is created. this has caused Outlook 2010 to function improperly

On Jan 24, 2007, at 4:14 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > Hi , > > I needed to apply this patch to get the GCC frontend building on an > FC5 > x86 box . I am curious, what kind of failure are you seeing ? Thanks, - Devang

Hi all, I use SAMBA 3.0.13-1.1-SUSE on a SuSE 9.3 Pro boxed version. Has anything changed w.r.t SuSE 9.3's SUSE 10.0 Samba versions? I use the same setup in swat. Ver. 3.0.20b-3.1 (or 3.0.20-4) does not behave the way it should. PROBLEM 1: Last week I installed SUSE 10.0 boxed version with its SAMBA version 3.0.20-4 (Updated by YOU to 3.0.20b-3.1-SUSE), on a x86_64 System. All works, but

Hi all, I'm using valid users parameter in my smb.conf to allow certain users to access a shared services but the list of the users are increasing. Is there any possibility to put the names in a file and mapped the file to this parameter or any other alternatives? Thanks,

I just installed samba on my private home network. It looks like I only have read access to shares. Using swat, I changed the create, security, and directory mask to 777, and committed the changes. But I still can't write. Can someone tell me what I did wrong?

People, There is an imap client, which runs with user1 uid, but when its accessed to watch a maildir, whose (and its contents) ownership is user1:user1, this error occurs: dovecot: IMAP(user1): fchown(/path/user1/dovecot-uidlist.tmp, -1, 12(mail)) failed: Operation not permitted (egid=1000(user1), group based on /path/user1) dovecot.conf contains this line: mail_privileged_group = mail

I modified my smb.conf file according to an old doc I found online and I'm having problems logging in from either of my XP or NT boxes to access the shares on the linux box. I can see the samba linux server in My Network Places. I get the following error if trying to connect after navigating to it from My Network Places: \\lnxwebsrvr is not accessible. You might not have permissions to use

I want to create a user "samba" that has admin privileges over the directory where Win95 apps will be installed, but does not have root privileges. Are their any problems with doing so? Thanks, Carey =====================================================================e <> Carey F. Cox, PhD | PHONE: (409) 880-8770 <> <> Assistant

I'm having trouble with files being marked read-only in Windows because the Solaris file owner does not have write-permissions on the file; group-write is allowed: -r--rw---- 1 user group 32 Feb 13 14:19 testfile.txt I thought that setting "store dos attributes = yes" for this share would allow the "read only" setting to be stored in extended attributes, but it

Thank you all for your time in responding to my query. My understanding was also similar to what you all mentioned here but wanted to check if there are any recent developments in solving this problem. Thanks, Ramana On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:32 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > Right. Technically we can get rid of debug info that corresponds to dead > sections, but in