similar to: Samba4 and Windows 7 password change

Hi people. Im reading the samba manual to join my freebsd box with to an win2k3 AD Domain, i install samba from ports with support for AD, already check that my samba program has been build with support for kerberos, ldap and all the stuff the manual recommended, now about kerberos, we have some stuff in /etc/rc.conf # # kerberos. Do not run the admin daemons on slave servers #

I would like to bump my question 2015-05-27 10:21 GMT+03:00 Krutskikh Ivan <stein.hak at gmail.com>: > Hmm, looks like it's not. I've just set the password for something that > cracklib-check would argue using both ad management tools and at windows > login. Should it work that way or I'm missing something? > > My dc's smb.conf: > > [global] >

I'm trying to compile Samba 3.0.4 with Active Directory support on OpenBSD 3.5, using the native Kerberos libraries (which happens to be Heimdal 0.6). Unfortunately, ./configure isn't working right. If anyone can help me figure out what the problem is, i would appreciate it. First a bit of info on OpenBSD's Kerberos path layout, in case it matters: /usr/libexec - daemons

Hi everyone, A quick question: Is check password script option working for ad dc setup? I believe, ad on it's own cannot provide password protection against dictionaries.

Hi, all, I run the latest Samba4 with Windows 7 clients. I have a share that I created in smb.conf like so: [common] path = /home/pmw/installed/samba/common-share csc policy = manual read only = no Within it, I created a file using a regular user. That file has fine-looking security: that user has full permissions, Everyone has read-only permissions. 'getfattr' on that file

Hmm, looks like it's not. I've just set the password for something that cracklib-check would argue using both ad management tools and at windows login. Should it work that way or I'm missing something? My dc's smb.conf: [global] workgroup = KURSK realm = KURSK.MTT netbios name = DEBIAN-DC server role = active directory domain controller

I'm trying to compile Samba 3.0.4 with Active Directory support on OpenBSD 3.5, using the native Kerberos libraries (which happens to be Heimdal 0.6). Unfortunately, ./configure isn't working right. I think i'm missing a switch or something. If anyone can help me figure out what the problem is, i would really appreciate it. First a bit of info on OpenBSD's Kerberos path

hi folks, To forward everything that does not belong to AD (subdomain ad.domain.intra) to the domain "domain.intra" I configured an entry as show below in named.conf.local zone "domain.intra" IN { type forward; forward only; forwarders { 172.16.1.10; }; # ns1.domain.intra }; Within this network (172.16.1.0/24) I have dc1 (dc1.ad.domain.intra), dc2

Hello, We have two DCs. One runs Windows 2003 R2, and the other Samba 4.0.5. Forest functional level is Windows 2000 native. I recently demoted (worked flawlessy now, which was a great relief), rebuilt and re-promoted my Samba 4 DC, as my problems that I posted to this list about two monts were still unresolved (see https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-February/171898.html), and I thoght

> > And I would just put 'forwarders { 172.16.1.10; };' in 'options' > I already have this entry, but for reverse lookup it does not work. Eg: dig suporte.domain.intra +short 172.16.1.15 dig -x 172.16.1.15 +short shows nothing On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:51:00 -0300 >

Here's a more detailed overview, both DCs are identical: itwerks at jaaadc01:~$ uname -a Linux jaaadc01 3.13.0-96-generic #143-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 29 20:15:20 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux itwerks at jaaadc01:~$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS Release: 14.04 Codename: trusty named -V BIND 9.10.4-P1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have just successfully launched Printmaster Gold Version 3 (for Window 3.1 or 95; wine configured as Windows 2000) using version 0.9.30 on Xubuntu Edgy (with updates) with the following caveat: Printmaster must be launched twice because on first launch the following error dialog appears: 'Cannot initialize 16 bit thunk server

Hi, to count vector elements with some property, the standard idiom seems to be length(which): --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- x <- c(1,1,0,0,0) count.0 <- length(which(x == 0)) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- however, this approach allocates and discards 2 vectors: a logical vector of length=length(x) and an

I have been unable to get my Samba shares on RedHat 7.3, Samba 2.2.3a to be visible from my Windows 2000 SP1 server. From the DIAGNOSIS.txt tests (results below) I think that nmbd is not working properly, but it stops and starts fine, and a ps -A shows 1 X smbd and 2X(?)nmbd processes running, I have tried the suggestions there without luck and am not sure where to go next. I'd appreciate

On 2/28/2018 5:46 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Feb 28, 2018, at 3:29 PM, Kaylor, Andrew via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> For the first part of Sanjay’s question, I think the answer is, “Yes, >> we can fold all of these to NaN in the general case.” > > Agreed.  Those IR instructions are undefined on

Hi, I need this plot: given: x,y - numerical vectors of length N plot xi vs mean(yj such that |xj - xi|<epsilon) (running mean?) alternatively, discretize X as if for histogram plotting and plot mean y over the center of the histogram group. is there a simple way? thanks! -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://thereligionofpeace.com

In InstCombineCompares.cpp, routine InstCombiner::FoldFCmp_IntToFP_Cst, there are these lines: // Comparisons with zero are a special case where we know we won't lose // information. bool IsCmpZero = RHS.isPosZero(); // If the conversion would lose info, don't hack on this. if ((int)InputSize > MantissaWidth && !IsCmpZero) return nullptr; Why check for positive

is there a way to avoid c() appending ".0" and ".1" to seed? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > c("nons"=1, "seed"=3) nons seed ## good! 1 3 > c("nons"=1, "seed"=tab[1]) nons seed.0 ## don't want ".0"! 1 2344600 >

Hi, Sorry for the late report but I've only just found these issues. Llvm.org isn't working for me at the moment but I'll file tickets once it is. The issues are: 1. Almabench has some significant numerical differences and fails the reference check for some configs. I'm investigating this one at the moment but early indications are that it's a similar (but different)

> On Feb 28, 2018, at 6:33 PM, Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > On 2/28/2018 5:46 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Feb 28, 2018, at 3:29 PM, Kaylor, Andrew via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>> For the first part of Sanjay’s question, I think the answer is, “Yes, we can fold all of