similar to: Examples for smbldap

Hi, folks ! Perhaps somebody can help me with a litle isuue. I?ve got a PDC with Ubuntu+Samba 3.5 +LDAP working fine in my network. But now I?m trying to implement a fileserver that autenticate against my domain server. If someone have any idea about how to do it and can give me a link or some clue about it, I really will apreciate it! Thank you very much for your time.

Hello All: Could someone please explain if the following log output is normal for my setup (see below)? Setup is WAN-based Samba/LDAP domain with Samba PDC and master LDAP at corporate location. 6 Samba/LDAP BDC's with 1 at same location as PDC and then 1 at each remote site connected via WAN. NetBIOS information communicated via WINS server on corporate PDC over VPN. LDAP directory

On 3/19/19 2:52 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:04:27 -0500 > John McMonagle <johnm at advocap.org> wrote: > >> I'm open to alternatives but need to be up and running 24/7 on the >> linux side. >> My boss hates windows more than I do and will likely be looking for a >> new job if I use windows to administer the the linux side.

On 4/4/19 3:18 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:09:18 -0500 > John McMonagle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I managed to do migration using "classicupgrade". >> Doing tests with debian buster 2:4.9.4+dfsg-4. >> For the moment using samba internal dns and sub-domain of >> ad.advocap.org. Had issue

I'm open to alternatives but need to be up and running 24/7 on the linux side. My boss hates windows more than I do and will likely be looking for a new job if I use windows to administer the the linux side. We only use windows if there is no other way do do something. On 3/19/19 12:08 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:03:12 -0500 > John McMonagle via samba

I managed to do migration using "classicupgrade". Doing tests with debian buster 2:4.9.4+dfsg-4. For the moment using samba internal dns and sub-domain of ad.advocap.org. Had issue forwarding dns if I used main domain. When it comes to real production will use bind that I understand better but don't want to mess with my other dns servers now. Had a w10 box join samba4 ad

Christian Thanks for the information. Also thanks to mj. That's sounds promising How did you migrate your data? Did you need to add any schema to samba4 ad? Were in 5 cities and some of the Internet is not 100% reliable. Will need samba4 in each office to make sure they can log in even if the Internet is down. How reliable is the the ad syncing? Does it need a lot of bandwidth? One of the

We are currently running samba3 nt4 domain controllers using smb-ldap-tools. We want to convert to samba4 ad so we can run new versions of windows server. I know of: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Migrating_a_Samba_NT4_Domain_to_Samba_AD_(Classic_Upgrade) But that would break us by moving all ldap to the ad ldap. We have lot's of stuff in ldap. Currently administer using ldap account

In the past I have used clonzilla under xen to backup windows domains. I just tried it and it will not work. this is xen 4.1.2 and clonzilla-live 1.2.10-14 the disk line is: disk = [ ''phy:/dev/xvg0/nfdlts-c,hda,w'', ''file:/extra/isoimages/clonzilla.iso,hdc:cdrom,r'' ] It boots cd OK. The problem is devices are xvda not hda and clonzilla is not happy with

Have amd64 xen 3.1 installed on debian etch. Have all the domu file systems in lvm. Problem 1 If I have a xfs files system when I mount it on domu I get this error: Filesystem "sda5": Disabling barriers, not supported by the underlying device XFS mounting filesystem sda5 Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda5 If I mount with nobarriers the message goes away. If I mount under

Been running this for quite a while and noticed that have intermittent problems getting out. Find that if I ping the same site from 2 computers it may work on one and fail on the other. Also was surprised that some time they are going out different interfaces at the same time. Seems to work all the time from the firewall. Running 2.6.10 kernel with the multipath routing patches on a debian

Should have read this first: http://samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/upgrades.html#id2600749 Problem is I did it the wrong way on a few production systems. Odds are this is the second time I did it wrong. Running Debian Lenny using smbldap. It mostly works. Existing members of the domain are working OK. The first thing that got my attention is was not able to join a new xp workstation to

Have 4 xen servers with windows domains. 2 work OK and 2 have xp domains with slow network performance. Doing most of the testing on a xen system that currently is not in production. Running xen 4.0 with 2.6.32 kernel from lenny backports. Have xp service pack3 freshly installed with no updates. Installed gplpv gplpv_XP_0.11.0.213.msi hdtack gives 60mb/sec which is good iperf gives ~15Mbits/sec

Hi Timo... It's happens some strange issue with my maildir using NFS. If i use a Local Hard disk, i don't get any of this messages about memory error. Jan 12 10:57:50 brc dovecot: imap(alex at exemplo.com.br): Error: opendir(/storage/nfs/3/emexis/messages/ exemplo.com.br/alex/Maildir/.Drafts/new) failed: Cannot allocate memory Jan 12 10:57:51 brc last message repeated 4 times Jan 12

Hi Quentin, Yes, the code allows to process connected instructions. Although it should be taken into account that the instruction next to the current processed instruction must never be erased because this invalidates iterator. I've been fixing a bug in AArch64InstrInfo::optimizeCompareInstr: instructions are converted into S form but it's not checked that they produce the same flags as

I'm using Samba v3.5.4-62 on Fedora 13 PDC Using LDAP passdb backend and do the following... 1. Login as user on Windows system using domain user name and password - Login successful 2. Press Ctrl-Alt-Del 3. Press Change Password 4. Enter old and new password as prompted 5. Receive response "You do not have permission to change your password." I receive the following

Hi, I find it's quite strange how condition dependent instructions are processed in PeepholeOptimizer::runOnMachineFunction: 01577 if ((isUncoalescableCopy(*MI) && 01578 optimizeUncoalescableCopy(MI, LocalMIs)) || 01579 (MI->isCompare() && optimizeCmpInstr(MI, &MBB)) || 01580 (MI->isSelect() && optimizeSelect(MI,

I''m using shorewall with openvpn and traffic shaping at all of our offices. I have noticed for a while that occasionally ping times are excessive. Usually this is during overnight off site backups but some times during the day. I have assumed the is was an ISP issue but now I''m suspecting it''s problem with openvpn and traffic shaping. In the test case have 2 sites

Rusty, Anthony, Dor, I need your brain power :-) On smp guests I have seen a problem with virtio (the version in curent Avi's git) which do not occur on single processor guests: kernel BUG at /space/kvm/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:228! illegal operation: 0001 [#1] Modules linked in: ipv6 CPU: 2 Not tainted Process swapper (pid: 0, task: 000000000f83e038, ksp: 000000000f877d70) Krnl

Rusty, Anthony, Dor, I need your brain power :-) On smp guests I have seen a problem with virtio (the version in curent Avi's git) which do not occur on single processor guests: kernel BUG at /space/kvm/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:228! illegal operation: 0001 [#1] Modules linked in: ipv6 CPU: 2 Not tainted Process swapper (pid: 0, task: 000000000f83e038, ksp: 000000000f877d70) Krnl