similar to: Doubt on Samba and NFS configuration

Hi I am writing an R library. The documentation for one of my functions includes an example that I *know* works - simply cut and paste into R on either Windows and Linux and it works perfectly, no errors or warnings, nothing, nyet. However, when I run "R CMD check" on the library, I get an error. I am running R CMD check on linux, and the offending piece of code appears to be:

Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Aki Tuomi [mailto:aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi] Sent: Friday, 1 September 2017 2:15 AM To: dovecot at dovecot.org; Raymond Sellars Subject: Re: Mixed Autehtnication and password schemes > The above not suggests I can't use DIGEST-MD5 with master password configuration, if using more than one passdb setup. I don't understand why there would be a

Dear R users,I am looking for an easy (i.e., direct) way in obtaining the F and p values from the intercept in anovas with within-subject designs. Data are from a psychophysics expeirment where I am using d' (d-prime) values obtained from 3 modalities of presentation in each subject.I would like to know not only whether there is an effect of modality, but also wether the main effect is

Hi Folks.. We have started to convert our Veritas clustered systems over to ZFS root to take advantage of the extreme simplification of using Live Upgrade. Moving the data of these systems off VxVM and VxFS is not in scope for reasons to numerous to go into.. One thing my customers noticed immediately was a reduction in "free" memory as reported by ''top''. By way

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Subject: Full Mac report <p>Anyway, here's my full report. I'm gonna recommend the Audion 3 for Mac, and just tell people to follow directions from the dv8 website for the PC. Here goes: Went to the diskset and clicked...got a menu...two Mac options...onc called "Legacy Mac OS," the other was for Mac OSX, which I don't have. So

HI, The question is a ZFS performance question in reguards to SAN traffic. We are trying to benchmark ZFS vx VxFS file systems and I get the following performance results. Test Setup: Solaris 10: 11/06 Dual port Qlogic HBA with SFCSM (for ZFS) and DMP (of VxFS) Sun Fire v490 server LSI Raid 3994 on backend ZFS Record Size: 128KB (default) VxFS Block Size: 8KB(default) The only thing

Hi, sorry if I am brining up old news, but I couldn''t find a good answer searching the previous posts (My mom always says I am bad with finding things :) However I noticed a difference when creating a zfs filesystem compared with a vxfs filesystem in the available size. ie. ZFS zonedata/zfs [b]392G[/b] 120G 272G 31% /zfs VxFS /dev/vx/dsk/zonedg/zonevol

Hi - a question for all ye rsync guru's out there... I have a need to migrate some fairly large Oracle datafiles from a UFS filesystem to VxFS (VERITAS), however I am not being allowed nearly enough outage time to perform a standard file copy migration. The datafiles (of which there are about 4 are about 50GB each in size and on separate UFS filesystems. I am considering instigating a local

Hi, rsync was running against filesystems /disk5 and /disk7 to back them onto remote server (172.16.101.4) using the following script: if [ `ps -ef | grep -v grep | grep ::d5 | /usr/bin/wc -l` -eq 0 ] then rm -f /etc/rsync5.log echo " --- Disk5 --- starts `date`" > /etc/rsync5.log /usr/local/bin/rsync -a --recursive --compress /disk5/ 172.16.101.4::d5 >> /etc/rsync.log echo

Hi, all-- What do you make of this? Here's my call log--looks like there are a lot of calls going in and out of the server that are not real incoming or outgoing calls. Does anybody have any clue what is happening? 2006-11-14 16:41:00 Local/8183... 8183461773 "8183461773" <8183461773> 8183461773 NO ANSWER 1 47. 2006-11-14 16:40:59 IAX2/Voice... 8183461773

Hello Gurus, Greetings. I have been assigned some work on the development of a migration tool. The requirement is that it has to migrate the data on a UFS/VxFs filesystem to an ext2 filesystem. What are the technical apects I will have to look into to achieve the same? Is it possible to change the on-disk structure of the UFS/VxFs filesystem to an ext2 filesystem? The question may

Is it possible to use DTrace to display the number of arguments and their types for userland or kernel functions that are not explicitly instrumented or documented by their authors? We''re talking about functions provided by Veritas VxVM/VxFS and the like, and for example, we might want to try tracing I/Os from App => VxFS => VxVM => ssd driver to see where I/Os get aggregated or

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Damjan Perenic<damjan.perenic at guest.arnes.si> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Richard > Elling<richard.elling at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Aug 11, 2009, at 7:39 AM, Ed Spencer wrote: >> >>> I suspect that if we ''rsync'' one of these filesystems to a second >>> server/pool ?that we would

Hi. I''m managing a HDS storage system which is slightly larger than 100 TB and we have used approx. 3/4. We use vxfs. The storage system is attached to a solaris 9 on sparc via a fiberswitch. The storage is shared via nfs to our webservers. If I was to replace vxfs with zfs I could utilize raidz(2) instead of the built-in hardware raid-controller. Are there any jbod-only storage

Has anyone had any experience with samba on a Solaris 2.6 system using vxfs file system?

Sometime back it was mentioned in a presentation we had that there might be a tool to convert an existing VxFS file system to ZFS without the need to do a lot of manual copying of files, or downtime for an application, etc. Does anyone know whether this is correct and whether it will be available when ZFS is incorporated into a GA''d Solaris 10 update??? This message posted from

We are looking at the alternatives to VXVM/VXFS. One of the feature which we liked in Veritas, apart from the obvious ones is the ability to call the disks by name and group them in to a disk group. Especially in SAN based environment where the disks may be shared by multiple machines, it is very easy to manage them by disk group names rather than cxtxdx numbers. Does zfs offer such

I''m an Oracle DBA, a dtrace noob, and I''m attempting to resolve an Oracle write performance problem on Solaris 10, Oracle 9iR2. The Oracle DBWR processes have poor write throughput writing to VxFS files. I suspect that the problem may be with POSIX readers/writer file locking. Ideally I''d like to identify, for a given DBWR process, readers/writer file lock contention

FYI... I've just posted a snapshot of the current SAMBA_2_2 source code (tagged release-2-2-6pre2). This includes all of the post 2.2.5 printing fixes as well as fixing some other bugs (such as VxFS quota support). Please test and report back your experience. There have been some updates to the Mandrake packaging thanks to Buchan. We are not building RPMS or *debs for this pre-release.

Hello experts, We have a large implementation of Symantec Netbackup 6.0 with disk staging. Today, the customer is using VxFS as file system inside Netbackup 6.0 DSSU (disk staging). The customer would like to know if it is best to use ZFS or VxFS as file system inside Netbackup disk staging in order to get the best performance possible. Could you provide some information regarding this