Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Users mapping in security tab"
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
On 14/05/2023 20:32, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
> The uid + gid are the unique identifier of a user in Linux, the name is
> only relevant for the translation of number (uid) to name.
>
> I.e. a local-user == domain-user when uid + gid are identical.
>
> My nsswitch.conf prefers local-users over domain-users:
>
> passwd:???????? files systemd winbind
>
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
On 14-05-2023 21:39, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>
>
> On 14/05/2023 20:32, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
>
>> The uid + gid are the unique identifier of a user in Linux, the name
>> is only relevant for the translation of number (uid) to name.
>>
>> I.e. a local-user == domain-user when uid + gid are identical.
>>
>> My nsswitch.conf prefers
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
On 14/05/2023 20:47, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
>
> On 14-05-2023 21:39, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14/05/2023 20:32, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
>>
>>> The uid + gid are the unique identifier of a user in Linux, the name
>>> is only relevant for the translation of number (uid) to name.
>>>
>>> I.e. a
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
On 14-05-2023 21:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>
>
> On 14/05/2023 20:47, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
>>
>> On 14-05-2023 21:39, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14/05/2023 20:32, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
>>>
>>>> The uid + gid are the unique identifier of a user in Linux, the
>>>> name
2015 Apr 22
1
Using smbpasswd users as AD Member
Hi,
I'm an old admin used to configure computers by using a few command lines, that used to quite similar for about 20 years now. For example there was a quite simple method to add a smbpasswd for a unix user to allow access to samba shares. Sometimes I like to share directories with the foreign AD world and sometimes I want to keep the directories inside the unix realm. For example a
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
On 14/05/2023 21:05, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
>
> On 14-05-2023 21:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14/05/2023 20:47, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14-05-2023 21:39, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 14/05/2023 20:32, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
>>>>
2023 May 14
2
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
On 14-05-2023 21:21, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>
>
> On 14/05/2023 17:29, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> We faced another issue with not having samba (ad-dc) users in local
>> /etc/password:
>> this way, we can't easily have services run as users this way, since
>> winbindd is
>> started later than most services are (and
2023 May 14
2
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
On 14/05/2023 17:29, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We faced another issue with not having samba (ad-dc) users in local
> /etc/password:
> this way, we can't easily have services run as users this way, since
> winbindd is
> started later than most services are (and it requires working network).
> Also,
> user-defined cron @reboot jobs aren't being
2006 Jun 08
1
ERROR: failed to setup guest info.
OK, I had this working a few days ago, but have evidently changed
something that I cannot locate. Someone hit me with their 2x4.
Samba 3.0.22, Fedora Core 4, ldapsam (OpenLDAP 2.3.24).
smbd will not start, with the "ERROR: failed to setup guest info" error (I
have "guest account = guest", which is a valid user with correct info in
LDAP):
ldap_connect_system: Binding to ldap
2006 Jul 03
2
How to join a domain without using root?
This is part of a larger post that was maybe too complicated for me to get
the right answer, so I'm breaking it down and will do it bit by bit.
Server is Samba-3 PDC, clients are NT4 & XP.
I can join the domain using root credentials (so the add machine script
works), but not when using 'administrator'.
unixuser 'administrator' has primary unixgroup 'ntadmins'.
2015 Jul 09
4
Samba local user without /etc/passwd
Hi list,
I have a (naive?) question about samba local users.
My system: CentOS 6.6 w/Samba 3.6, connected to an AD Domain through
Winbind.
When creating a local user, I always first create a Unix user with
passwd and then I use smbpasswd -a <unixuser> to establish the mapping
between the tdbsam database and the local /etc/passwd file.
I wonder if, using the tdbsam in conjunction with
2005 Oct 17
1
username maps and security=ads
I have been having problems with username maps and security=ads.
I now have a solution (or at least a work around) that is working
for me. I sort of stumbled across it, as I don't recall reading
any samba docs that mentions the need to have the realm name
in the smbuser file.
Samba server is RHEL3 with samba-3.0.20 compiled from source
authenticating against a windows ADS.
Here is the
2006 Aug 18
8
Strange Usermapping problem with 3.0.23b
Yesterday evening I upgraded my FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE Server from Samba
3.0.22 to 3.0.23. This gave me a LOT of work today... :-(
This is what I found so far:
My Samba-Server is member of a large ADS-Domain. After the upgrade,
file based Usermapping didn't work anymore... better: it worked TWICE.
(I once opened a PR for that a few years ago :-). So, with LogLevel 3:
2005 Feb 02
0
Samba 3.0 question, DOMAIN vs. SERVER method? Help!
Hello all!
We are attempting to get Samba-3.0.10 working on a new Solaris 8 machine in
preparation for upgrading an existing 2.2.8 installation (both use the
SMCsamba packages from SunFreeware.com). We copied over the smb.conf file
and the usermap from the Samba-2 installation, and seeing some weird
symptoms when Windows users try to connect to the new machine.
We ran "net join" to
2007 Mar 15
3
Question about AD user/ACL mapping
We have updated our long-standing Samba install on a Solaris 8 box to
3.0.24 and are interested in making use of the Windows ACL mapping
capabilities to help take over a Windows share. However, there is a
snag - the pre-existing box has usernames that differ from people's
Windows logins, i.e. their Unix login is freddy, and their Windows
login is fred_smith.
I have our AD domain membership
2023 May 15
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
On 14/05/2023 21:15, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>
>
> On 14/05/2023 21:05, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
>>
>> On 14-05-2023 21:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14/05/2023 20:47, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 14-05-2023 21:39, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>>>>
2023 May 14
2
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
Hi!
We faced another issue with not having samba (ad-dc) users in local /etc/password:
this way, we can't easily have services run as users this way, since winbindd is
started later than most services are (and it requires working network). Also,
user-defined cron @reboot jobs aren't being run, for the same reason: cron is
stared before winbindd on most systems. This is quite difficult to
2009 Nov 24
2
SLES 10 client keeps removing and re-adding accounts to groups
SLES 10 clients keeps removing and re-adding accounts to groups.
Can''t use this product in production as a result, I''d like to use it
though.
Using clients 25.1 with master 25.1
This keeps re-occuring with every single puppet client run:
Nov 24 09:57:09 puppetd[26915]: (//unixuser/User[jdoe]/groups) groups
changed ''wheel'' to ''unixadm,wheel''
2019 Sep 23
1
testparm comaprison
Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba
In chel di` si favelave...
> Full qouta search list :
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=quota&list_id=25312
I don't think it's a samba bug!
Simply i'm pointing out that disabling 'winbind enum' can lead to some
'glitches', mostnotably 'getent passwd' return no domin users (by
design) and
2004 Mar 15
1
cannot change file permissions
Hi List,
I have some severe problem with Samba 3 with ldapsam
backend on debian stable.
The problem is that I can not change the rights
of a file or directory on the server from Windows.
I get this in smb.log:
---cut---
[2004/03/14 21:59:09, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(1380)
create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID
S-1-5-21-2443489570-4015384086-1858331161-3009 to uid or gid.