similar to: Graceful WINS resolution across disconnected networks

I have two networks connected via ipsec with openswan. Each network contains one samba server managing one workgroup each one. The network structure is the following one: Network 131.0.0.0/16--Samba: 131.0.0.106 (workgroup groupa) --- 200.x.x.x ----internet----- 64.x.x.x ---- Samba: 192.168.1.1 (workgroup groupb)--Network 192.168.1.0/24 Machines in groupa (network 131.0.0.0/16): pc3 (131.0.0.2,

Hi, I''m getting an infrequent "Socket Error (getaddrinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution)" when sending e-mail with ActionMailer. Most of the time, mail works. But I noticed the error during testing and wondered what best practices might be for handling this kind of error. My SMTP settings look OK. I''m running RHEL 3 for my Rails app and use an external SMTP

 Hello, everybody.  This one''s got me stumped.  What I''m trying to do is have two networks--192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0--with SMB and WINS running between them.  So far I can mount SMB shares allright, but I can''t browse by WINS names across the router.  I''ve posted this question on Linuxquestions.org; you''ll find the details there.  Here are my

I have a Linux box with two interfaces for the private LAN (eth0,eth1) and another one connected to the Internet. I have two subnets in my LAN (192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24) and eth0 and eth1 are the gateways of either subnet (192.168.0.1, 192.168.1.1). I have a Samba server running in the Linux box, and this Samba server is at the same time the local master browser and a WINS server, there

I have a Linux box with two interfaces for the private LAN (eth0,eth1) and another one connected to the Internet. I have two subnets in my LAN (192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24) and eth0 and eth1 are the gateways of either subnet (192.168.0.1, 192.168.1.1). I have a Samba server running in the Linux box, and this Samba server is at the same time the local master browser and a WINS server, there

I have a Linux box with two interfaces for the private LAN (eth0,eth1) and another one connected to the Internet. I have two subnets in my LAN (192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24) and eth0 and eth1 are the gateways of either subnet (192.168.0.1, 192.168.1.1). I have a Samba server running in the Linux box, and this Samba server is at the same time the local master browser and a WINS server, there

I'm finally getting somewhere in setting up my FreeBSD PDC. I try and login via my XP client and now it gives me this odd message. "Cannot login because a duplicate user already exists on the network. Please goto control panel and system and change your computer name." Sorta paraphrased there, perhaps off by a word or two but that's pretty much what it tells me. I'm just

Referencing: http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/network_administration_guides/samba_reference_guide/17_NetworkBrowsing_34.html I've got two subnets (192.168.2.1 and 192.168.1.1). All the machines on both subnets are running XP Home or Pro and are all part of the same workgroup (WORKGROUP). I've added an OpenSUSE box on x.x.2.1 and have set it as the WINS server with a very simple

> > > Referencing: > http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/network_administration_guides/samba_reference_guide/17_NetworkBrowsing_34.html > > I've got two subnets (192.168.2.1 and 192.168.1.1). All the machines > on both subnets are running XP Home or Pro and are all part of the > same workgroup (WORKGROUP). > > I've added an OpenSUSE box on x.x.2.1 and

Hi all, After having read most of the available documentation I still have got problems interconnecting two networks in router mode: My configuration consists of two private home networks that I want to connect: Vienna 192.168.0.0/24 - Internet gateway 192.168.0.1 Berlin 192.168.1.0/24 - Internet gateway 192.168.1.1 VPN Devices are configured as 192.168.3.1 (Vienna) and 192.168.3.2

I am having some network connectivity issues that manifest itself through ping, wget, dnf, etc. The symptoms are intermittent ability to ping, was wget, or connect to repositories. Where this inquiry is going is: If your internal network is using 192.168.1 or 10..50.10, what should be in /etc/networks. My current file contains: default 0.0.0.0 loopback 127.0.0.0 link-local 169.254.0.0 And

On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 19:55, Jay Hart <jhart at kevla.org> wrote: > I am having some network connectivity issues that manifest itself through > ping, wget, dnf, etc. > The symptoms are intermittent ability to ping, was wget, or connect to > repositories. > > Where this inquiry is going is: If your internal network is using > 192.168.1 or 10..50.10, what > should be

Hi Who concern, I setup TINC VPN follow these. 192.168.1.x / 24 (Client groups) | 192.168.1.1 (eth1) (GW1) 202.44.34.206 (eth0) || Internet || 202.44.45.14 (eth0) (GW2) 192.168.2.1 (eth1)

Just wanted to let anyone know that might have checked out the generator before and couldn''t use it b/c you''re project required graceful degredation. Well its in there now. Thanks everyone and enjoy. Demo: http://ajaxscaffold.height1percent.com Release Notes: http://www.height1percent.com/articles/2006/03/04/ajaxscaffold-2-2-0-released-with-graceful-js-degredation -- Richard

My Gurus! I'm still playing with asterisk in the lab here. There is a feature that I need in a production asterisk system. I was wondering if it already exists in asterisk. When we want to shutdown a production asterisk system, we would like the shutdown to happen after there are no more calls being processed. In other words, a shutdown command that does the following: - block asterisk

Dear all, I am currently implementing an experimental key exchange (KEX) algorithm. Unlike current algorithms like DH, mine needs to be able to fail gracefully, and in case of failure, continue with whatever algorithm would have been negotiated if mine was not selected. My strategy for graceful failure is to remove my KEX algorithm from myproposal[KEX_DEFAULT_KEX] and to initiate a new key

hi everybody by an assumption I expected VM guests to be shut down/off gracefully when the host is being powered down or rebooted, but this does not seem to be the case so I wonder.. Am I missing some libvirt components/packages ? Or my assumption is incorrect and guests have to be shutdown manually? it's all SL 7 and guest are M$ regards P.

Hi Dovecot-gurus With the introduction of LE certificates the certificate renewal cycle is a lot faster, unfortunately even a "dovecot reload" cuts the existing connections when doing the cert updates, which is quite frustrating - and yes most clients automatically reconnect but still... Is any work going into implementing a more ?graceful reload? for dovecot like the one for nginx

should have mentioned, apologies, suspend is the graceful shutdown of the guest I was thinking of. Guest is win2k8, why would it not suspend? On 22/10/14 10:58, lejeczek wrote: > hi everybody > > by an assumption I expected VM guests to be shut down/off > gracefully when the host is being powered down or > rebooted, but this does not seem to be the case so I wonder.. > Am I

Hi Dovecot-gurus With the introduction of LE certificates the certificate renewal cycle is a lot faster, unfortunately even a "dovecot reload" cuts the existing connections when doing the cert updates, which is quite frustrating - and yes most clients automatically reconnect but still... Is any work going into implementing a more ?graceful reload? for dovecot like the one for nginx