Displaying 20 results from an estimated 80000 matches similar to: "AD to Kerberos + LDAP + NFS migration"
2010 Aug 20
3
Users mapping in security tab
Hi there,
I have a Samba installation acting as a Domain Member with a disk share (the
partiton is mounted with acl and user_xattr options). I am not using
winbind, because I want the domain users to be mapped to Unix users.
Everything works right, excepting the users in the Windows Explorer security
tab. I will try to explain the situation with an example.
I have username map, that maps
2020 Jan 28
0
NFS and unsafe migration
Hi all,
I have a question about NFS datastore and unsafe migration.
When migrating a virtual machine having a virtio disk in writeback cache
between two hosts sharing a single NFS datastore, I get the following error:
"Unsafe migration: Migration may lead to data corruption if disks use
cache != none or cache != directsync"
I understand why libvirt alerts for unsafe migration in
2010 May 23
0
Problems with NFS version 4 & Kerberos
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I've got a problem with kerberoized NFS server , i can't start
rpc.svcgssd daemon on my server.
shaver ~ # rpc.svcgssd -fvvv
ERROR: GSS-API: error in gss_acquire_cred(): Unspecified GSS failure.
Minor code may provide more information - No principal in keytab matches
desired name
Unable to obtain credentials for 'nfs'
unable
2014 Jan 06
0
nfs client kerberos cache
Greetings,
Not sure if this is the correct mail list.
I have the following test environment set up:
- 1x ipa master = ipa1.example.com
- 1x nfs server = nfs1.example.com
- 1x nfs client = nfsclient1.example.com
NFS version 4 is used and the appropriate Kerberos principal has been
created in IPA:
[root at nfs1 ~]# ipa service-show nfs/nfs1.example.com at EXAMPLE.COM
Principal:
2020 Nov 12
0
nfs root kerberos
On 11/12/2020 8:52 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 12/11/2020 13:27, Jason Keltz via samba wrote:
>>
>> On 11/12/2020 8:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>>> On 11/11/2020 10:54, Jason Keltz via samba wrote:
>>>> Hi Louis,
>>>> I've looked into that and I'm not sure how this would be done?
>>>> By the way, even with
2014 Jan 13
0
[resolved ]nfs client kerberos cache
2014/1/6 Darod Zyree <darodzyree at gmail.com>
> Greetings,
>
> Not sure if this is the correct mail list.
>
> I have the following test environment set up:
> - 1x ipa master = ipa1.example.com
> - 1x nfs server = nfs1.example.com
> - 1x nfs client = nfsclient1.example.com
>
> NFS version 4 is used and the appropriate Kerberos principal has been
> created in
2020 Nov 10
0
nfs root kerberos
Well, my problem is i dont now how Centos/RH is handing this.
I just know that the basics are..
1) The server must have A and PTR record. (optional you can use CNAMEs as long A+PTR match).
2) you use nfs/$(hostname -f) and add this in the local keytab and in the computer object$
net ads keytab add_update_ads nfs/$(hostname -f)
( you dont add the REALM here ) !
3) i know nfs
2020 Nov 12
0
nfs root kerberos
On 11/12/2020 8:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 11/11/2020 10:54, Jason Keltz via samba wrote:
>> Hi Louis,
>> I've looked into that and I'm not sure how this would be done?
>> By the way, even with your NFS translation fix (which doesn't work
>> for me because gssproxy), do you do this before accessing root files..?
>> sudo root
>>
2020 Nov 11
0
nfs root kerberos
Hi Louis,
I've looked into that and I'm not sure how this would be done?
By the way, even with your NFS translation fix (which doesn't work for me because gssproxy), do you do this before accessing root files..?
sudo root
kinit -k 'host$'
?
Jason.
On Nov. 11, 2020, 2:48 a.m., at 2:48 a.m., "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>Hai
2020 Nov 10
0
nfs root kerberos
Hai,
Now, the only thing thats different here is, i do this on a member and on Debian
I think if you read this : https://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg165144.html
You have the info you need in there, at least i think, it does contain all things you need.
If this is a samba member we are talking about. This its already joined.
Add the spn to the HOSTNAME$ and let winbind refresh the keytab.
2020 Nov 12
2
nfs root kerberos
On 11/11/2020 10:54, Jason Keltz via samba wrote:
> Hi Louis,
> I've looked into that and I'm not sure how this would be done?
> By the way, even with your NFS translation fix (which doesn't work for me because gssproxy), do you do this before accessing root files..?
> sudo root
> kinit -k 'host$'
>
OK, after a bit of a battle, I now have a Centos 7 Unix
2020 Nov 09
0
nfs root kerberos
On 09/11/2020 19:41, Jason Keltz via samba wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have Samba AD configured correctly, and can mount kerberized NFS
> from all the CentOS 7 clients.? I'm not able to use "root" on the
> client even though the nfs export specifies the option: no_root_squash
> option.
>
> I completely understand that in order to use the "root" identity
2020 Nov 12
1
nfs root kerberos
On 12/11/2020 14:19, Jason Keltz via samba wrote:
>
> On 11/12/2020 8:52 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>> On 12/11/2020 13:27, Jason Keltz via samba wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/12/2020 8:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>>>> On 11/11/2020 10:54, Jason Keltz via samba wrote:
>>>>> Hi Louis,
>>>>> I've looked into that
2010 Nov 16
0
Still have problems with secure NFS and Kerberos
Both pc13267 and pc14113 run CentOS 5.5. On pc14113, my test user gets a
home directory when logging in, but not on pc13267. But why?
All logs below are from /var/log/messages. I have removed dates and
stuff from the beginning of lines to make them more readable, and then
grouped lines about the same thing from both machines.
> pc13267 Using keytab file '/etc/krb5.keytab'
>
2020 Nov 12
2
nfs root kerberos
On 12/11/2020 13:27, Jason Keltz via samba wrote:
>
> On 11/12/2020 8:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>> On 11/11/2020 10:54, Jason Keltz via samba wrote:
>>> Hi Louis,
>>> I've looked into that and I'm not sure how this would be done?
>>> By the way, even with your NFS translation fix (which doesn't work
>>> for me because
2008 Feb 27
2
Dovecot NFS Indexes and IMAP Migration
Hi there,
After being extremely impressed from implementing it in some customer
installations, I've decided to migrate our mail infrastructure to dovecot.
Being able to have /bin/checkpassword support across the board for pop,
imap, and smtp authentication, as well as being able to ditch stunnel for
the SSL layer...where were you in 2001?!? :)
I have two concerns, the first is about the
2020 Nov 11
2
nfs root kerberos
Hai Jason,
Hmm, yes, well, only one thing i can think of now is
And thats the last one..
Is the server allowed to delelagate kerberos services?
If you have set that also? It's the last thing i can remember.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
> Jason Keltz via samba
> Verzonden: dinsdag 10 november
2020 Nov 09
0
nfs root kerberos
On 09/11/2020 20:20, Jason Keltz via samba wrote:
> On 11/9/2020 3:00 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>>> I figured that I should just need to do a "kinit Administrator" on
>>> the client, and take on the root identity, then I could write as
>>> root where I have no_root_squash configured...? However, when I
>>> tried this on a client, I get a
2020 Nov 10
1
Migrate mailbox from NFS folder to new NFS folder
Hi everyone,
I need to migrate many user mailboxes from an NFS folder to a new NFS
folder, both mounted on the same Dovecot server (2.2.27).
Once migrated, users will connect to a new Dovecot server (2.3.4.1).
I would like to know how to use /doveadm backup/ (or sync?) instead of
/rsync/ as I noted that after migration with rsync I have duplicates and
some e-mails marked as unread.
What is
2008 Jul 16
1
[Fwd: [Fwd: The results of iozone stress on NFS/ZFS and SF X4500 shows the very bad performance in read but good in write]]
Dear ALL,
IHAC who would like to use Sun Fire X4500 to be the NFS server for the
backend services, and would like to see the potential performance gain
comparing to their existing systems. However the outputs of the I/O
stress test with iozone show the mixed results as follows:
* The read performance sharply degrades (almost down to 1/20, i.e
from 2,000,000 down to 100,000) when the