similar to: Samba4 questions (idmap, forest, inter-domain trust)

I am working with Samba 4. I think I have found a bug. It would only be a problem in the event that Samba4 starts doing inter-domain, forest level, and cross forest trusts. Domain Users is 100 on a setup that is provisioned to have the range 3000000, 4000000. This maps the local gid for users. This seems to be a bug to me. Shouldn't Domain Users be within the range and not be the same as the

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at googlemail.com> wrote: > > On 27.02.2012, at 17:13, Николай Лихогруд wrote: > >> Dear LLVM, >> >>     Consider two loops with one interation - >>     First with constant lower bound, second with usual non-constant lower bound: >> >>     int main(int argc, char ** argv) >>     {

Dear LLVM, Consider two loops with one interation - First with constant lower bound, second with usual non-constant lower bound: int main(int argc, char ** argv) { int numOfIterations= 1; int stride=1; int lowerBound = 1000; - 1st | int lowerBound = argc; - 2nd int upperBound = lowerBound + (numOfIterations - 1)*stride; int i = lowerBound;

I am investigating changing BoundsChecking to use address-based rather than size- & offset-based tests. To explain, here is a short code sample cribbed from one of the tests: %mem = tail call i8* @calloc(i64 1, i64 %elements) %memobj = bitcast i8* %mem to i64* %ptr = getelementptr inbounds i64* %memobj, i64 %index %4 = load i64* %ptr, align 8 Currently, the IR for bounds checking

On 27.02.2012, at 18:49, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Benjamin Kramer > <benny.kra at googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> On 27.02.2012, at 17:13, Николай Лихогруд wrote: >> >>> Dear LLVM, >>> >>> Consider two loops with one interation - >>> First with constant lower bound, second with usual

Well, we are getting somewere...;) >It is probably 'greyed' out because no Windows tools use it or will add it. You will probably need to use Unix tools (ldb or ldap) to remove>them, but you can if you so wish ignore them. What you should never do is to rely on them being there, because they may or may not be there.Ok, I'll let it be there> You need to remove the gidNumber

On 27.02.2012, at 17:13, Николай Лихогруд wrote: > Dear LLVM, > > Consider two loops with one interation - > First with constant lower bound, second with usual non-constant lower bound: > > int main(int argc, char ** argv) > { > int numOfIterations= 1; > int stride=1; > int lowerBound = 1000; - 1st | int lowerBound =

Hi Kevin, Thanks for your interest and for your deep analysis. Unfortunately, your approach doesn't catch all bugs and is vulnerable to an attack. Consider the following case: ...................... | ----- obj --- | | end ^ ptr ^ ^ end-of-memory The scenario is as follows: - an object is allocated in the last page of the address space - obj is byte

*From:* flang-dev <flang-dev-bounces at lists.flang-compiler.org> *On Behalf Of *Eric Schweitz (PGI) *Sent:* Thursday, November 01, 2018 1:02 PM *To:* flang-dev at lists.flang-compiler.org *Subject:* [Flang-dev] RFC: Adding debug information to LLVM to support Fortran In order to support debugging in the Flang project, work has been done to extend LLVM debug information for the Fortran

Please read the reported bug and bjorn answer.. which does not help any to a solution of fix, or explenation. But the big question now is, does someone somewhere know what bjorn is talking about. i did search for "gencache" but no go here.. just from old documentation. https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/tdb.html gencache.tdb Generic caching database.

Hello all, I have largely only used samba in my home. I have several large projects I see coming for me that require domain trusts, forests and Samba 4. As I have been reading up on Samba 4, I have found several things people have mentioned that are being worked on or need to be worked on. One of which is uid/gid <-> rid mapping and work for inter-domain trusts. I think I may have found a

Nuno, Inspired by this email thread, I spent a bit of time today looking through the implementation of BoundsChecking::instrument(..). Based on my reading of prior work, it should be possible to do these checks in two comparisons, or possibly even one if the right assumptions could be made. Could you provide a bit of background of the expected domains of Size and Offset? In particular,

Hi, > Could you provide a bit of background of the expected domains of Size and > Offset? In particular, are they signed or unsigned integers? A > non-negative size doesn't seem to make much sense in this context, but > depending on how it's calculated I could see it arising. Is a zero Size > something that might arise here? I'm assuming the Offset comes from an

Good day, I wasn't sure whether this should go to the user list or the samba-technical list. I chose here based on the descriptions of the list. Forgive me if my understanding of the naming is inaccurate. It is my understanding that Samba3 (and I believe 4, as well) has a very powerful SID<->UID mapping mechanism which will auto create the UID in a range. This is what I mean by Unix ID

I have a brand-new install of Debian 8 without systemd and a freshly-built Samba 4 install with issues. I created this as a standalone AD DC, setup group policies, etc and then took it to the client location. Now nothing works. I keep getting "RPC server unavailable" on Windows machines and trying to list shares on the DC itself results in NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. I am lost as there are

Dear R-users I intend to create a function which calls some smaller other functions in return. Some of these smaller functions all call some functions. I do not know a good way to do this. I tried using the source() function to include the smaller functions within the main functions before they are called. This does not work, or maybe i am not doing the right thing. For example: the

On 1/24/19 12:15 AM, Per Jessen wrote: > Trever L. Adams wrote: > >> I know that sieve doesn't do math. The file would be created >> externally. >> >> Based on examples in section 4.4 of >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5260#section-4 >> >> I figured something like this would work. >> >> if date :value "le" :originalzone

Hi, > > Why don't you create a Member server with cups installed?. I suppose > that you have a gateway between both subnets, right? > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_AD_Member_Server > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_as_a_print_server > > With that, the cups server can authenticate the users using the DC > server and you just need to print

On 04/25/2011 09:12 AM, Trever L. Adams wrote: > > As I look at the code in the hg reference above, I think there is a bug. > If HOME should be preserved as first, and some of these others may be > critical to proper operation, they should be preserved automatically, no > matter what the configuration says. This seems to be contrary to the > code and to the top of the page

I'm trying to use the LDAP backend for the idmap database but I just can't seem to get it to work. There really is rather pathetic documentation out there on how to implement this. I've basically got my ldap server setup with an OU called smb and another OU under it called idmap. Here is my smb.conf file: [global] workgroup = HQ server string = Theo's Samba Server