similar to: Problem mapping Samba shares in Windows

Hi, I have setup samba server on my linux box (Fedora Core 4 with latest samba, just updated via RHN) and has configured file sharing via samba for this server and connecting to it from my windows xp box. So far, everything works fine and it is very fast. Then, I configured a printer, and shared it via samba. And, I can see+connect to it from Windows XP and can even print. But, everything

Hi list, I am encountering a problem in connecting a Windows 2003 to a Samba 3.0.21b server. The Samba server is configured to have a security = share option, so that no password is needed. I can connect to the server by typing "net use z: \\192.168.51.1\data", and it is successful. However, if I try to do "dir z:", no file found! Same behaviour are found in Windows

Hello All, I'm running Samba 3.0.24 as PDC and file server on Gentoo Linux, AMD64, 2.6.19 kernel, 100MBit/s network, and experience quite slow file transfers from Samba to WinXP SP2 clients: the speed is varying, but is about 1-2Mb/s at best. I spent quite some time investigating the issue, here are the intermediate results: 1) This happens only when transferring _from_ _Samba_ to

Hi, I've noticed that over a WAN (T1) I'm getting incredibly slow file copy performance. Using smbclient on a linux machine on one size of the WAN, As you can imagine, this makes all of our file shares unusable over the WAN. It's not an issue with WAN performance, because using scp to transfer the same file, I get speeds of ~145k/s. A tcpdump of the file copy of ~2MB file that actually

List, Long and confusing message follows... I'm facing a frustrating problem. XP clients can use resoures on the samba server by IP-address, but not by name. So, "net view \\servername" gives "access denied" but "net view \\ipaddress" gives list of shared resources. Samba server (3.2.7 sernet rpm) is a member server in W2003 domain. I emphasise that with

Hi, We have been a samba shop since way back and have used DFS quit a lot the last years. When we went with security ads instead of domain our dfs died. We have tried 3.028(sun) in solaris wich we are leaving and 3.2.1 in linux, our migration target. For our 3.2.1 installation the config looks liket this and the problem manifests itself as a empty share. [Global] kernel oplocks = False oplocks

Hello, I've a CentOS-5 system (kernel-2.6.18-8.1.14el5) SMP arch running samba-3.0.27a. A user reported extremely long load time (11 minutes) of a 43MB file across a 3Mb/sec WAN link. Copying the same file to a windows server and opening it from there on the same client system took about 2:30. Research found the below thread from April:

RedHat 9.0, kernel 2.4.20-8bigmem I can't get Samba 3.0.0 to talk to anything except lo. ./configure --prefix=/usr/share --exec-prefix=/usr --silent --with-logfilebase=/var/log/samba --with-privatedir=/etc/samba/private --with-configdir=/etc/samba --with-lockdir=/var/lock/subsys/samba --enable-cups --with-acl-support --with-winbind --with-pam_smbpass --with-ldapsam

Hello, Last week I have detected with Zabbix that a member of my Samba domain had been downloading at a rate of around 8 Mbps for two days and a half. When asking the person to whom belonged the machine, he didn't know he was downloading anything but he said he had observed his machine had slowed down since then. I took a tcpdump of the traffic before terminating his session on Windows

I''m seeing some pretty pitiful performance using ZFS on a NFS server, with a ZFS volume exported (only with rw=host.foo.com,root=host.foo.com opts) and mounted on a Linux host running kernel 2.4.31. This linux kernel I''m working with is limited in that I can only do NFSv2 mounts... irregardless of that aspect, I''m sure something''s amiss. I mounted the zfs-based

I'm trying to get Samba up and running and having a terrible time. It says that I should be able to run nmap and see that 137 and 139 are open - which they are not. I have not added any restrictions in smb.conf, do not have a firewall running and I have increased the log level to 5 to see all of the messages. It says that it is talking on 137 but it kind of looks like it's not talking

Hello mailinglist, I have a strange problem, which occurs sometimes on some WinXP clients. It is not 100% reproducable for me, but it returns regular. The problem is, that somehow a user can't delete a directory. All files in the directory will be removed successfully, but the directory itself not. Deleting with the Explorer or over the cmd-console returns in the same result. First the

I am using a Samba 4.1.16 as an Active Directory domain controller. After a lot of time complaining to myself that my users' properties sheet in ADUC did not contain the Unix Attributes tab, it finally occurred to me that I should look again into Windows 7 >> Control Panel >> Programs and Features >> Turn Windows Features on and off. Lo and behold, there it is: under

Hello, I'm trying to use http from syslinux.efi but it fails while trying to establish the connection to a FreeBSD http server. A packet capture shows: TCP healthd > http [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=64 TSval=1094 TSecr=0 TCP http > healthd [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=64 TSval=1596927428 TSecr=1094 TCP healthd > http [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=2097152

hello, i'm not a heavy samba user in general (works without any serious tweaking on my modest home network), but one of my clients is and we are seeing some strange behavior. perhaps it makes sense to someone with more clue. if not, i could use some advice in how to figure out what is going on. the setup: a couple dozen windows clients (xp pro 64bit & vista ultimate 64bit) taking

Hi, First at alll, I beg your pardon because maybe I explained bad my questions (because my low level english) I have asterisk 0.5.0, asterisk-oh323-0.5.6, openh323-1.12.2 and pwlib 1.5.2 compiled and installed. I have modules alsa 0.9.8 compiled and installed My PC has an audio card ac97 chipset intel i810 in its motherboard. I want to use asterisk in this way: |PC linux | --ethernet--

Hello, The following two patches add an additional offset part in the FB resize event. Samuel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

I have problem getting answer on http request from all my local subnets but not from local subnet. Ping and requests on ports 21 22 23 25 110 works fine. I logged port 80 in rules files and I got accept entry same for local subnet and other subnets. Local subnet is 192.168.6 Dec 29 09:52:40 zinfsrv2 kernel: Shorewall:loc2fw:ACCEPT:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:09:6b:07:ca:cc:00:10:b5:fa:bd:71:08:00

Greetings Samba Fans! I'm experiencing a strange problem which started after installation of Service Pack 2 for Windows XP: When a user tries to print there is a long delay (sometimes around 2 minutes) before the printer properties page is opened. This only affects Windows XP with Service Pack 2 installed. I did a 'tcpdump' on the printserver and observed something quite strange:

> Full ack! +1 > > Regards > Tim > > Am 12. Februar 2015 22:12:45 MEZ, schrieb Miguel Medalha > <miguelmedalha at sapo.pt>: >> >> I am using a Samba 4.1.16 as an Active Directory domain controller. >> >> After a lot of time complaining to myself that my users' properties >> sheet in ADUC did not contain the Unix Attributes tab, it