similar to: Samba 3.0.33 ignoring group ACL after joining to AD

Hello, I have noticed some ALC issues with files and directories. I use samba server 3.0.33 on CentOS 4.8 joined to Windows 2003 domain. Everything works fine, all users are authenticated to domain controller. My aim is to give FULL ACCESS (open/read/write/rename/delete..) to directory "testdir" to two users, john and mark without using groups because I have no permissions on domain

When I try to open a specific file from a samba share (LSP), the application (on WINXP) says that it could not open the file. The errors pasted below (from the smb client) show something different from anything I've seen before. Usually these kinds of problems are straight forward. In other words, usually this is a permission issue. In this case, it is not. I am trying to open a file

Hello, I just recently migrated our samba fileservers to be members of our corporate AD domain, which seemed to work out so far. Now, I experience problems with group membership of groups that are defined on our old ldap server. To avoid recreating all these groups in the AD, i thought it'd be nice to use the old groups with the new user accounts via nsswitch. Samba 3.0.22 on debian/unstable

Hi Tested if i could upgrade my kyocera drivers but no go.. ( where i have currently 6.3.909.0 installed. ) Tried/Tested with win10 and win7 x64. ( 4.9.6 ) with the windows printer manager. ( as shown on the wiki ) KyoceraClassicUniversal v3.3_signed KX_741525_UPD_signed_EU All get : HRESULT: 0x0000023f (ERROR_APP_INIT_FAILURE) ( see below ) Tested them all, and atm only one works..

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ~ Dear List, ~ My Win2k and WinXP workstations are endlessly complaining about can't ~ create central copy of the user profile, because of ..., or something ~ like that (in hungarian). When I'm trying, even as root to change the ~ acls of anything in the profile share I get an error, with other shares ~ this is working perfectly (I have ACLs

Hi everyone, since i upgraded from 4.10.2 to 4.10.4 i can't write into subdirectories of a share anymore. This worked perfectly fine before i upgraded and also works again if i downgrade.? I think either something is fishy with the 'filename_convert_internal' function of ".../source3/smbd/filename.c" or my configuration needs to be adjusted for 4.10.4. I tried several

Robert Gurdon robert.gurdon at gmail.com 12:49 (0 perce) c?mzett: samba Hai, I would like to set up a DFS with this configuration: I have 3 Samba4 servers (4.1.4). 2 of them should work as a DFS "client" the third one will be the DFS stotage (actualy this servers has the required amount of space). So, i configured all shares on DC3 and point to those shares on DC1 and DC2. Everything

Hello! I just wanted to migrate one of our 3.0.2a servers to 3.0.8pre1 and found that all is OK win WinXP, but there is problem with WinMe. When user tries to access directory with name ???????? (Contracts) here is what I see on log: [2004/10/04 08:45:01, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(108) unix_convert called on file "????????" [2004/10/04 08:45:01, 10]

I'm trying to copy a 400 MB file from a Windows 98 host to a FreeBSD 4.5 Samba server providing access to a FAT32 filesystem. I've got "strict allocate = no", but from what I can see with debug set to 10, it is doing a ftruncate which takes about 50 seconds to complete. It appears that Windows gets impatient and generates an error (while Samba is still waiting for the

Dear Jeremy: We use samba 2.2.12 as our samba server, and it worked perfectly before, but now there is one security problem found in samba 3.0 now, so we worry about our samba server, but for some reason we can't update to samba 3.0.25, so can you tell us whether the problem be existent in samba 2.2.12, or how can I test our samba server with some tools software?

Hi! I'm trying to set up a msdfs to complete the move of our id-department fileshares from a win2003 server to samba. But it doesn't work and from what I can understand when reading the logs Samba doesn't make any attemt to connect the share on the other server. So, my question is, how can I confirm that msdfs acctually are compiled into my samba-version? I add a trace from the

Hi, I am using 3.0.22 on Ubuntu 6.06. I'm trying to setup a DFS root. Here is the smb.conf share section: [test] path=/var/test writable=yes msdfs root=yes The /var/test contains a single symlink: $ ls -l /var/test total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2007-05-22 14:56 pdf -> msdfs:cladms004\pdf On a Win2K client I can connect to \\cladms004\pdf successfully. I can also access the test

Hello I've got some strange problems with Samba-3.0.4. When using roaming profiles, keyboard layout is set to english (instead of norwegian) and a lot of programs wont load correctly. Setting log level = 3 revealed a lot of errors after the netlogon-script had executed (and all shares correctly set up). I switched to log level = 10 to get a more detailed view of these errors (show below).

In a follow-up to a previous post a couple weeks back, we've implemented a Samba 3.0.20 (Suse packages on 10.0 - recompiled to include idmap_rid) server to replace the Windows 2000 file server in our Win2003 Active Directory. For the most part things have been going well, but occassionally people will get access denied errors to things that they were accessing just fine minutes before. With

Hi, we have a strange samba locking problem with version 3.0. Sometimes user only get a read only access to files. This happens with different users on different clients. Unix permissions are OK. I have realy no idea. Can you help ? Thanx Peter Huber -------------- next part -------------- [2004/03/02 15:03:56, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_root_user(217) change_to_root_user: now uid=(0,0)

hi, we're using a samba-server over DSL using openVPN and the speed is very good at browsing directories and quite OK at loading/saving files except for word & excel where it takes about 20-30 seconds to save even a small file. which is no wonder because the following happens in log.smbd when i click "save" in word, it obviously checks for a bazillion tmp- and lockfiles (

Hi we have samba 3.0.14a on FreeBSD 5.4. We tried with different kind of locking and oplocks (both enabled and disabled). If we try to copy from a Windows XP client a file larger than 3g, we get these error: Cannot copy XXX. The specified network name is no longer available. We traced this problem in the logs (log level 10) and we got this error ------------ [2006/09/19 10:29:41, 5]

Hello, Can someone explain why my exclude option is not excluding filles as instructed in my script below. I have tried multiple methods and still have been unsuccessful in excluding the one file "test.sql". The methods I have tried are: 1. Removing EXTRAFLAG variable -a 2. Removing using -a 3. Option --include infront of --exclude and behind of --exclude. 4. rsync /software/testdir/

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11545 Bug ID: 11545 Summary: -A (preserve ACLs) with --link-dest=DIR fails when DIR has a directory with the same file's name Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

First - many, many congrats to team ZFS. Developing/writing a new Unix fs is a very non-trivial exercise with zero tolerance for developer bugs. I just loaded build 27a on a w1100z with a single AMD 150 CPU (2Gb RAM) and a single (for now) SCSI disk drive: FUJITSU MAP3367NP (Revision: 0108) hooked up to the built-in SCSI controller (the only device on the SCSI bus). My initial ZFS test was to