similar to: Does anybody use idmap_adex?

Hi, Actually I am using the Backend Idmap_AD. I thought Idmap_adex is still under heavy development. Tobias Mit freundlichen Gr??en Tobias Mucke LFK-Lenkflugk?rpersysteme GmbH Serverpool, FCI4 Landshuter Stra?e 26, 85716 Unterschlei?heim, GERMANY Phone: +49 89 3179 8438 Fax: +49 89 3179 8927 Mobile: +49 170 635 3830 E-Mail: tobias.mucke at mbda-systems.de http://www.mbda.net Chairman of

Hi Guys, I'm having problems getting the new idmap_adex module to work. When using the idmap_adex plugin I get the following: # wbinfo -n administrator S-1-5-21-XXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-500 User (1) # wbinfo -i administrator Could not get info for user administrator As expected attempting to lookup user & group info via commands which use libnss also fail. The

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release Announcements ===================== This is the second preview release of Samba 3.3.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Major enhancements in Samba 3.3.0 include:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release Announcements ===================== This is the second preview release of Samba 3.3.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Major enhancements in Samba 3.3.0 include:

Hi Guys, I'm setting up a new file server in our domain environment and I'm having problems with the adex configuration/module. I have couple of working file servers using rfc2307/idmap_ad and they are working perfectly. What attracted me to the idmap_adex module is the domain trust/forrest authentication support. I have 2 domains not in the same forest with a 1-way trust setup. The

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 3.3.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Major enhancements in Samba 3.3.0 include:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 3.3.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Major enhancements in Samba 3.3.0 include:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 3.3.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Major enhancements in Samba 3.3.0 include:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 3.3.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Major enhancements in Samba 3.3.0 include:

After spending some time trying to figure out how to merge the allocating backend from idmap_ldap and the rest of idmap_adex, I have found that it may not be worth the effort to avoid having to configure idmap_ldap. Has anyone had success with idmap_ldap as the uid/gid allocator and idmap_adex in Samba4? I haven't done much with ldap, so any instructions on how to add schema info needed

Hi, I'm trying to integrate an existing linux environment with a Windows AD environment. All my users are already in AD with valid rfc2307 attributes defined so I need a way to authenticate my users using username, uid, gid, shell and homedirectory from AD. I've been using Kerberos+LDAPs before but that requires a dummy AD user hardcoded with username and password in /etc/ldap.conf

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ================================================================ "After all, computers crash, people die, relationships fall apart. The best we can do is breath and reboot." Sarah Jessica Parker ================================================================ Release Announcements ===================== This is the first

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ================================================================ "After all, computers crash, people die, relationships fall apart. The best we can do is breath and reboot." Sarah Jessica Parker ================================================================ Release Announcements ===================== This is the first

Is it possible for the uid/gid numbers that are generated by the idmap_rid and idmap_hash to collide if there are a large number of users or groups? I cannot seem to find any documentation on the limitations of these plugins. Before using I want to make absolutely sure that there won't be any collisions. In doing some research about Likewise Open, I see it's hashing routine can have

Hello all, I'm having a problem with winbind not able to start. I've joined an active directory domain successfully using likewise and for brief time this was working, people were able to mount drives by their active directory account. I know that likewise is working because I'm successfully able to ssh into the box using these accounts. But now windbind has stubbornly refused to

Greetings, I have had Samba/Winbind/Kerberos single-sign-on authentication working for a few years now, for a single domain, and it works great. It pulls the RFC2307 populated attributes just like you'd expect, and people get the IDs mapped according to their attributes in AD. This works for version 3.2.7 and 3.4.3. I had to give the domain's Domain Users group a gid in the range of

I'm currently compiling Samba 3.3.X with the following: CFLAGS = -g -Wall -O2 ./configure --cache-file=./config.cache \ --with-fhs \ --enable-shared \ --prefix=/usr \ --sysconfdir=/etc \ --libdir=/usr/lib/samba \ --with-privatedir=/etc/samba \ --with-piddir=/var/run/samba \

What is wrong with this? # chmod -R A+user:webservd:add_file/write_data/execute:allow /var/apache chmod: invalid mode: `A+user:webservd:add_file/write_data/execute:allow'' Try `chmod --help'' for more information. This works in a zone, works on S10u5, does not work on OpenSolaris2008.11. CT

Hi, [Context : ubuntu 11.11 64bits, cman, clvmd, gfs2, ctdb, samba, likewise-open, all running fine except...] I've setup ctdb to manage public_addresses (to manage one virtual ip actually), and I've explicitely told smb.conf that netbios name = foobar_cluster I've done that *after* I've manage to make samba, likewise-open and AD to work nicely together. I guess now all the

Ok. But to the time in a short term period is there is way to make building successfull ? May be some temporal solution ? One more, I need to build-in to binaries: libreplace,libwinbind-client,libwbclien, that is replace,winbind-client,wbclient "targets" while building all regarding configure options specified below: --prefix=/usr \ --enable-fhs \