Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Anyone try 'ssh server" and get "Password for DOMAIN\USER:>>""
2012 Jun 19
2
flac -- exhaustive model search vs. -A <*>?
Linda Walsh <flac at tlinx.org> wrote:
...
> That brings up another question then... What is 'hi' (v. low?)...
Zero, or close to zero, is low. 12 is high.
...
> What's a subset stream?
This is explained at:
http://flac.sourceforge.net/format.html
in the bulleted point beginning, "FLAC
specifies a subset of itself as the Subset
format."
...
> Another
2017 Feb 20
2
wbinfo -i returns the same id for all users, authentication doesn't seem to go through winbind at all
Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> id TESTAD\\testuser
> returns "no such user" and
>
> getent passwd TESTAD\\testuser
>
> returns a "2" code.
>
----
On linux, to get 'domain\user' to resolve, I had to have
those entries in my /etc/passwd (and /etc/group for groups).
I.e. *w/o krb*, (in samba 3.x), I had entries like:
2011 Aug 11
2
difference between '%u' and '%U'?
I realized in looking at my smb.conf, I'm not using these in
a consistent manner, and .... well I just don't understand what the
differences are between them.
Sure I can read the smb.conf page:
%U
session username (the username that the client wanted, not
necessarily the same as the one they got).
vs.
%u
username of the current service, if any.
---
2011 Mar 03
1
pam_winbind([sshd|su|...]:account): valid_user: wbcGetpwnam gave WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
I've been getting these in my log for some time and was wondering what I had
to do to get 'pam_winbind' to 'work' with my samba 'DC'?
In looking around the net, others w/this error message were having a
problem with blocking login's and password changes, completely.
In my case, I have the 'pam_winbind.so' module in '/etc/pam.d/common-passwd'
setup
2017 Feb 19
4
wbinfo -i returns the same id for all users, authentication doesn't seem to go through winbind at all
Emmanuel Florac via samba wrote:
> Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind enumerate users"
> Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind enumerate users"
> Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind enumerate groups"
> Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind enumerate groups"
It may be irrelevant, but I have:
winbind enum groups = Yes
winbind enum users
2018 May 21
3
Cannot delete folder
Yves Goergen wrote:
> The issue still exists. Can anybody explain to me why dovecot creates
> IMAP folders with the wrong filesystem permissions?
On a lark, I looked through my dirs @ permissions. Shorted lines a bit
so they'd fit w/o extra lines between them using:
(get rid of text before permissions, and shorten user/group to a few letter)
find . -type d -ls|sed -r
2009 Sep 17
1
smb.conf(5) format meaning question
In the smb.conf manpage, there is a notation used, (G) or (S) for global or share.
Does (S) mean it can only be used in a Share section (i.e. - will be ignored
in the global section), or is that they *can* be applied at the share level,
and, possibly set a default in the 'G'lobal section?
example:
"ea support = yes"
Seems like that could mean that extended attrs are
2020 Sep 09
4
Trying to add workstation to smb domain and get access denied
Rebooted my system for a windows update. When it came back up,
It said the trust between my workstation and DC was broken.
(Running Windows 7x64 SP1). Very odd, haven't seen that for a while.
I thought it would be easy: unjoin/rejoin. But upon trying to rejoin,
I get:
The join operation was not successful. This could be because an existing
computer account having name 'ANY'
2011 Jun 16
1
Sticky bit problem
Hi
We are building a Linux app under Centos 5.3, using gnu make 3.81 and gcc 4.12. The working directory is on a remote machine and is either a Samba share or a Windows 7 share. We find that in the case of a Windows 7 share the resulting executable has the sticky bit set in group:
On Windows 7 share:
-rwxrwSrwx 1 <snip> myapp
On Samba share:
-rwxrwx--x+ 1 <snip> myapp
The
2008 Jan 16
2
Optional 'test' or benchmark cipher
I hope this is the right list, as I'm desiring a feature addition
in openssh. I would like the option to have a 'null' cipher (after
the initial authorization, similar to 'delayed' for compression).
It would have to be enabled on both client and server and server
would never use it unless it was both enabled and asked for by
the client.
I'd strongly prefer it be able to
2013 Dec 02
2
lastes sources don't include "drop_cache" option
Was there some reason that patch got dropped?
Otherwise rsync eats up all the buffer memory.
Note -- I tried directio -- didn't work due to alignment
issues -- buffers have to be aligned to sectors.
The kernel, if I remember correctly, has been on again/off again
on requiring alignment on directio -- because most of the drivers
and devices do for directio to work, at.
"dd"
2011 Oct 25
2
Thunderbird slow in talking with dovecot IMAP AND to sendmail
I'm trying to find out what's causing this slowdown -- it's INTOLERABLE....
over 1 minute and less than 1% done. (400MB file)...
After trying 3 times, I gave up and logged in using X to the server and
ran Tbird from there....
Mail sent out in < 1 minute, though the copy to dovecot took about 50%
longer.
So...
I looked at the network trace.
and everyfrackin' body was
2012 Aug 05
3
rsync 3.0.9 incompatible with self? (proto incompat on local->local)
Familiar? protocol error on a local file copy?
How can I have a proto incompat when it it is talking to itself?...
This was on the ERROUT...
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes to socket [sender]:
Broken pipe (32)
File-list index 531530 not in 531937 - 533437 (finish_hard_link) [generator]
rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at rsync.c(652)
[generator=3.0.9]
rsync:
2012 Jun 14
3
flac -- exhaustive model search vs. -A <*>?
"Linda A. Walsh" <flac at tlinx.org> wrote:
> what does the exhaustive model search do?
I am not an expert on the guts of FLAC, but
there is some information about this at:
http://flac.sourceforge.net/documentation_format_overview.html
and scroll down to "MODELING".
> Does it try all of the functions listed under "-A" to find the 'best',
>
2013 Dec 13
17
[Bug 10322] New: Slow Performance over Network rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322
Summary: Slow Performance over Network rsync
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: Joerg.Grube at Gmx.De
2011 Aug 03
1
PDC forgot it was part of domain... "official" (ha!) samba hack around to fix...
Among various problems since I upgraded to 3.6 (none of which got answered
really, -- so I backgraded to 3.5.10 and started debugging from there,
considering 3.6.0 too unstable/too incompatible for 'whatever' reason...
One of the probs I had was 'root' couldn't use "net rpc" <anything> --
kept getting auth failures.
Wasn't the passwd, -- could reset it via
2002 Oct 23
2
Running smb without nmb? (Linux Suse 8.1 feature)
I recently upgraded my Linux distro to SuSE 8.1 which
came w/samba 2.2.5.
A feature of the upgrade was that it 'split' the startup
script for samba from 1 script for _smb_ & _nmb_ to 2 scripts.
Now the prologue (used by insserv to create the numbered startup
scripts with dynamic numbering based on dependencies in the prologues
of all the startup scripts for a given run level) says
2018 Oct 19
3
please remove permission check that disallows private-group access.
Third party programs should not be dictating to users how
to manage their systems. Things like:
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@ WARNING: UNPROTECTED PRIVATE KEY FILE! @
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Permissions 0660 for '/Users/law.Bliss/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open.
It is required that your private key files are
2011 Sep 10
1
Bash completion file(s) for samba utils...
I was wondering if anyone already had completion files for samba utils like
'net' wbinfo...etc... I can never remember all the params, I keep wanting
to hit <tab> to autocomplete for options like I can on many other sys
utils.
So I started looking at examples of existing completion files and started
cobbling one together... if no one else has some (which would be great!),
I'll
2015 Apr 15
2
Resend of returned email: [3.6.6] Possible to allow password-free read/write access?
Why would the samba list be looking for a reverse host name
via IPV6? IFAIK I only have an IPv4 addr and reverse
addr. I don't know if the original went to the person
in france or not.
Anyone else getting bounces like this?
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 13:19:19 -0700
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem