similar to: Blocking workgroup discovery

Le 25/10/2018 à 18:22, Giulio via samba a écrit : >> Is enabling SMBv1 on the Windows 10 side the only solution to get Linux share be visible for the Windows "Network" listing? > > Yes, it's the only way to see the samba computer in the computers' list. > > When using SMB>=2, network discovery will use a different protocol > (WSD/LLMNR) which samba

Hello everybody,my new server is setup with postfix as a MTA and dovecot as a MDA, mysql is used as a user db, and postfixadmin is used to setup accounts. Login via pop works fine, also sending via smtp works fine. HOWEVER: when i sent a mail by hand via smtp it is delivered in the wrong directory. For example for test at xdatasystem.com i have the following directory:

Hi there, Following situation: 3 nodes, Alpha (Home fileserver), Beta (regular PC), Gamma (Notebook). All three in a NATed LAN usually, though the notebook also gets carried around and connects from the outside from time to time. Tinc should help me keep my other 2 PCs reachable from Gamma, even when I'm not at home. Also I plan on maybe adding more nodes to that in the future. I have set

Dear Guus, while improving the PMTU Discovery algorithm, I found the following behavior in the method "send_udppacket": 1) The code checks, whether the data size is smaller than the MTU, thus if it fits into a single UDP packet. If not, you send the packet via TCP. 2) The data is compressed, changing its size. (Usually, making it smaller, but that's not always

I couldn't find anything like this in the archives, although it must be there. We are running Samba 2.0.7 on RedHat Linux 6.0 using Windows 95 clients. Our Network Neighborhood is filled with workgroups that no longer exist. In some cases, someone connected with a laptop that was in a certain workgroup and it was added to the list of our workgroups. Even that that person has been gone for

Hi Guus, while checking the source code, I stumbled upon PMTU Discovery. I've got a question regarding the process of sending/receiving PMTU packets. As I understand, the packet flow is like this: 1 .Tinc creates a packet with a specific payload length to send it as an PMTU probe. (The data part is just some random bytes.) 2. This packet gets compressed and sent

> Active Directory was created to replace netbios If you see 2008r2, 2012 and even 2016 and 2019 acted as AD DC but I think you saw it, it is (NetBios) still at a place here, despite on AD DC mode. As far as I know there are many small/medium LANs where NetBios features such as neighborhood, folders, printers sharing using NetBios names resolving and others are still used. In my opinion It

I'm not so up-to-date in Samba development progress, and I have a question. Is anyone now working in Samba service discovery on workgroup networks (without DC or AD)? I recently wrote xllmnrd, an IPv6 LLMNR responder daemon so as to make Samba and other local neighbor servers accessible on IPv6 by their host names but it hasn't solved the problem that Samba servers don't appear on

Hello, There are many workgroup names on Microsoft Windows Network. Sometimes, users could wrong type the workgroups name on self computers, and creating new record on WINS server. I don't want showing the unwanted names to end users. Only two workgroups must be showed. Is it possible that I could clean unnecessary names? regards.

(Samba version 1.9.18p4) I want to set up my environment thusly: - 2 workgroups, each composed of multiple subnets. - Each workgroup has a DMB and a WINS server (Samba only - no NT) - The two workgroups should collate browse lists so that clients on either workgroup can browse and connect to hosts on the opposite workgroup. I've read the documentation in BROWSING.txt and it does not appear

Hi, I have a samba 2.2.1a (cvs-06.08.2001) running as PDC for my domain, and it is doing fine. But in the broadcast domain there are severeal other workgroups (no domains) with their own Domain Master Browsers. Additionaly there are always a lot of unconfigured computers not under my control, which build their own workgroups (e.g. mdkhome, workgroup...). My problem is now, how do I prevent all

On 9/27/19 12:48 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 27/09/2019 18:33, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> >> I understand the "Function Discovery" side and wsdd (which is fine for >> local same network discovery somewhat similar to Network >> Neighborhood). I'm saying that even without that if I browse to just a >> computer in Windows

Dear All, It is not a typical R question (though I use R for this) but I thought someone will help me. For the list of P values, I have calculated FDR using p.adjust() in R (bioconductor). But my FDR values are same for all the P values. When do we get same FDR values? Does the smallest P values should less than 1/N? (where N is the number of P values) Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Ezhil

On 9/27/19 10:39 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 27/09/2019 16:19, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> With the removal of SMB1 (by default) and everywhere (e.g. Windows), I >> noticed that when I open up a computer (\\computer-name) I can see the >> shares that I have access to... that is, from a Windows Explorer (in >> my case Win10).? Is there any way to

Hi all, >> In other words, the dhcp server has to start the client on the >> correct binary for it's arch and by virtue of running different bins, >> we can determine the most appropriate config file for the client? > > That is definitely one way to deal with it. > > There is no way around the fact that you have to have different binaries > for different

Hi, Is it possible to discover iSCSI targets using libvirt API..? OR is it possible to get the similar results of below commands using libvirtAPI..? iscsiadm --mode discovery --type sendtargets --portal server1.example.com sudo iscsiadm -m discovery -t st -p 192.168.0.10 Regards Sijo

Hi, I hope this hasn't already been discussed to death, but I didn't find the answer through Google. In short, my question is: how can I advertise a Samba server through UPnP/Network Discovery? I'm currently using Samba 3.2.6, but should be able to upgrade if needed. I am trying to build an IPv6-only network, for now just for testing purposes. The problem I am having is that

Hi all, on CentOS7 / RHEL7 launching virt-manager causes a "discovery process" of the various configured VMs. This discovery is executed by inspection and overlayed disk files and it create a very short lived guest-xxxzzzyyy virtual machine. The end result is a pretty icon to the left of the virtual machine entry (ie: CentOS icon for a CentOS VM) and the list of installad packages

I see what you want me to do. But it does incur an extra MAC layer header to each VPN packet, more fragmentation. And broadcasts leak to all peers. It sure saves you from doing any improvements, but there are side effects that are undesirable to many customers. This is specially a problem if I want two VPN connections between two sites using redundant connections, we get an instant L2 loop. With