similar to: WINS server DMB and LMBs not communicating across subnet to update browse lists?

> > > Referencing: > http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/network_administration_guides/samba_reference_guide/17_NetworkBrowsing_34.html > > I've got two subnets (192.168.2.1 and 192.168.1.1). All the machines > on both subnets are running XP Home or Pro and are all part of the > same workgroup (WORKGROUP). > > I've added an OpenSUSE box on x.x.2.1 and

Hello Mike, Am 22.01.2015 um 21:24 schrieb Mike Ray: > cx510de: http://support.lexmark.com/index?locale=EN&page=product&userlocale=EN_US&productCode=LEXMARK_CX510&focusedTab=DOWNLOADS#1 > > ms510dn: http://support.lexmark.com/index?locale=EN&page=product&userlocale=EN_US&productCode=LEXMARK_MS510#1 These drivers seem not to support to be uploaded via the Add

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 1:46:53 AM > Subject: Re: [Samba] ACLs on Samba share not preserved when copying with Windows Explorer > > >> > > Hi Rowland, > > > > This Samba 3 server is joined to a Samba 4 AD domain

----- Original Message ----- > Hello Mike, > > Am 22.01.2015 um 21:24 schrieb Mike Ray: > > cx510de: > > http://support.lexmark.com/index?locale=EN&page=product&userlocale=EN_US&productCode=LEXMARK_CX510&focusedTab=DOWNLOADS#1 > > > > ms510dn: > >

Heyho. I'm trying to add registry entries to my workstations remotely from my server. I can currently do this remotely from any other workstation, using the standard Windows regedt32, but I'd like to do it form the server. .. The server is Samba 3.0.22-r3 on a Gentoo server. I've been digging around for a while now, and have managed to find docs for samba-tng which seem to

My network looks like this: internet 192.168.0.0/24 router ----+----+----+----- internal 192.168.5.0/24 | | | router ----+-----+------+- LNB--->mswin | | (also a | | | client | | samba | | .... | | server) | | samba | | samba

Hi, may be there are some best practice suggestions for the "best mode" for channel bonding interface? Or in other words, when should/would I use which mode? E.g. I do have some fileservers connected to the users lan and to some ISCSI Storages. Or some Webservers only connected to the LAN. The switches are all new cisco models. I've read sone docs (1), (2) and (3) so the theory

My network looks like this: internet 192.168.0.0/24 router ----+----+----+----- internal 192.168.5.0/24 | | | router ----+-----+------+- LNB--->mswin | | (also a | | | client | | samba | | .... | | server) | | samba | | samba

> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marc Muehlfeld" <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> > To: "Mike Ray" <mray at xes-inc.com>, samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 2:10:41 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] CUPS Windows point'n'click driver installation > > Hello Mike, > > Am 22.01.2015 um 20:11 schrieb Mike Ray: >

Hello, I'm beginning to give up on making Linux-HA's heartbeat work for my environment (CentOS x86_64) and am wondering what other option have I got to help me: 1. Use IPVS to maintain a cluster of virtual servers, either master/slave or load-balanced. 2. Use DRBD in master/slave fashion to keep a home-grown application highly-available. The first thing I stumbled upon is RedHat Cluster

Hi folks, I've followed a set of instructions I found on http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/centos_linux_guides/centos_enterprise_linux_sysadmin_guide/ch-diskless.htmli which describes using system-config-netboot to set up PXE booting. I used a CentOS-4.3 install (custom, all options de-selected, then anaconda-busybox installed after the fact) as a reference/base. I followed the

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 2:19:09 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] ACLs on Samba share not preserved when copying with Windows Explorer > > Hi, is the share stored on a standalone server or an AD member server or > what ? > > Not that

If I have a client that wants to enumerate and access shares on a subnet, and that client knows the IP of the WINS server, is there any need for the client to use the "browsing" services of a DMB or LMB? What is the order of operations of the client? Here is what I imagine to be the case: 1. client asks LMB for a list of all available shares 2. LMB sends client the list of all known

Hello ! I have a problem of syncing browse lists between DMB and LMB. The topology of ours network is as follows: Linux Network comma(Linux, DMB, WINS) vol(Linux) door(Linux, LMB) | | | | | | | | | --------------(195.226.226.16/28)------ | | | | | | | --(local net

Hello. Browsing accross subnets fails because "route2-3" can't sync its local browse list with the domain master browser "classix", which is also the WINS server. Everything else is fine. There is 1 and only 1 WINS server (classix) and no NT server. The error message in nmb log of route2-3 is: ==================================

I have a network with several WORKGROUPS(lets call them X,Y and Z) in it and a samba server which is in one of the WORKGROUPS(X). I have enabled WINS support in samba and all client machines has WINS server IP configured that points to the samba server. Problem: When a browsning the network from a client I can only see a some nodes(or none at all) in WORKGROUPS Y and Z. Usally it takes 10-20

There is Windows 2008R2 actng as DC and Samba4 4.5.2 acting as standalone server in the same network. Samba4 is set up to be DMB: domain master = yes local maser= yes browse list = yes os level = 254 preferred master = yes enhanced browsing = yes Windows 2008R2 includes also DMB role in itself. As following, if Windows boots first, before Samba starts, it becomes DMB and has workgroup<1b>

Hallo, I'm asking myself, which LDAP attributes are mandatory which optional for user and workstation accounts. After using the smbldap-populate command there where different attributes set than for adding users with the smbldap-useradd command. --- snip --- sambaAcctFlags: sambaHomeDrive: sambaHomePath: sambaKickoffTime: sambaLMPassword: sambaLogoffTime: sambaLogonScript: sambaLogonTime:

Have there been any problems reported with running 2.0.2 on servers using security=server with a 1.9.18p10 DMB? We've run into a situation where I've upgraded 4 of our servers to 2.0.2 but the DMB is still running 1.9.18p10. We have had sporatic trouble with the upgraded servers rejecting correct passwords because the DMB seemingly would not properly validate them. Today, we ran into a

I'm using r223407. Switching to a clean built on r223853, it still gives me: ldr x8, [x21,#8] stp x21, x8, [x19] dmb ishst ldr x8, [x19,#8] str x19, [x8] str x19, [x21,#8] Thanks, Chengyu > On Dec 9, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9 December 2014 at 15:14, Chengyu Song <csong84 at gatech.edu> wrote: