similar to: smb/cifs share network speed testing

Just curious, is anyone using Samba 4.0 alpha releases in a production environment and how is it working for you? I run an environment of about 500+ Windows XP on a Netware environment and have considerable Samba 3.0 experience, but I'd like to use GPO's to control and clean up a lot of previous tech support problems. Any thoughts? Eric -- Eric J. Feldhusen Director of Technology

Aloha, Does anyone know of any opensource or inexpensive software that can test a network for a possible VoIP installation? I have seen Chariot by NetIQ, but it is very costly! I am envisioning two or three "client" devices that talk to a server device. Each client could simulate 1-100 VoIP phone calls. The server module would monitor the QOS, jitter, etc., and provide some kind of

Hi, I'm getting horrible performance on my samba server, and I am unsure of the cause after reading, benchmarking, and tuning. My server is a K6-500 with 43MB of RAM, standard x86 hardware. The OS is Slackware 10.0 w/ 2.6.7 kernel I've had similar problems with the 2.4.26 kernel. I use samba version 3.0.5. I've listed my partitions below, as well as the drive models. I have a

hi, - big and ugly mail. If you don't like them, delete it now :-) - I have collected and classified some information of: http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html And I observed that ext3 performance is worse than previous kernels(2.4.19...). -ac and -aa are here only as reference. Complete information is in the upper URL. dbench: Performance is worse. dbench (Numbers are in

What's the best way to do this? Daily, jpg images are added to an inhouse server. Everynight I want to backup these images to a server offsite, via rsync. What I want is to determine what to set the bwlimit to. I also want to estimate how many MB's of images I can move nightly. Thanks Dan

Tool Recommendations for measuring UDP throughput / loss / jitter Hello all, I'm looking for recommendations on getting some measurement software set up so we can work with our ISP to determine where packet loss is occurring. Linux and windows tools are fine, it's just every time I start searching on google I run into many possibilities and am not sure what I should be trying. Maybe

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

Hello, i am searching for a method to generate traffic and measure it, to compare several version of tc configurations. For my thesis i am researching the best way to use tc for medium sized companies. For this purpose i analyzed the company network and created a tc schema. Now i have to test this definition in a kind of simulation outside the network. Also i have to do a comparison of the

I am trying to trouble shoot one of my ISP's network and compare to my other ISPs offering. Although network 1 is reasonably fast and has low enough latency, voice quality is not good and the reason for this is not readily apparent using standard network tools. What tools can be used to assess the quality of the network in terms of it's suitability for voice? I am using ping, mtr,

> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Shaw [mailto:chriss@watertech.com] > Sent: September 7, 2004 4:40 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Maximum tollerable lag/jitter for IAX2 > w/ojitterbuffer enabled? > {clip} > > If you can reproduce it, this smells like a bug... IAX runs over TCP and TCP >

I was glancing at my logwatch report when I noticed: dovecot: IMAP(robinmail): fchown(/home/robinmail/mail/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.log.newlock, -1, 10(wheel)) failed: Operation not permitted (egid=100(users), group based on /var/mail/robinmail): 1 Time(s) dovecot: IMAP(robinmail): fchown(/home/robinmail/mail/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.tmp, -1, 10(wheel)) failed: Operation not

I am new to xen and trying to get the primary domain working properly before I create a new one. I am using the Gentoo unstable sources (2.6.16-rc5) and xen 3.0.1 and the kernel boots Ok and eth0 is activated. At this point the network is active and I can ping. Then I shutdown net.eth0 and start xend. This restarts net.eth0 and does some other stuff. Now every thing looks normal (ifconfig,

I am trying to filter my imap mail sent to my phone by using sieve. Currently everything is set up and works well using mbox and sendmail as the lda. I have re-installed dovecot with sieve included and updated dovecot.conf, which gives # dovecot -n # 1.1.3: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf ssl_cert_file: /etc/ssl/dovecot/server.pem ssl_key_file: /etc/ssl/dovecot/server.key disable_plaintext_auth: no

I use dovecot to push email to my SE P1i and it works very well. :) However, I have two email accounts set up on the phone, one using my domain for GPRS and public WiFi and one using my WLAN address for use at home, the idea being I don't want to pay for GPRS data at home. The trouble is the GPRS account remains logged on and I get the mail in both inboxes. There is no option in the email

Starting at midnight Feb 1 my phone can no longer fetch mail from Dovecot. It endlessly connects and reconnects as you can see in the log below. I have restarted dovecot, the phone, deleted /home/robinmail/mail, all to no avail. I have turned on debug output but it does not tell me anymore. I can connect and see the folder using the KMail imap client. Any idea how I can proceed with this? The

Just curious, is anyone running Samba 3.x.x with LDAP using the Fedora/Redhat Directory server as the LDAP backend? -- Eric Feldhusen System Administrator http://www.remc1.org PO Box 270 (906) 482-4520 x239 809 Hecla St (906) 482-5031 fax Hancock, MI 49930 (906) 370 6202 mobile

I saw the presentation "Virtualization of Linux Servers" at OLS last month and it had some nice comparisons of Xen performance vs a lot of other virtualization/container technologies: http://ols.fedoraproject.org/OLS/Reprints-2008/camargos-reprint.pdf As always with benchmarks, there are questions to ask and points to quibble, but overall Xen looks quite good... except on Dbench. Has

hi everybody would a tool such as dbench be a valid bechmark for gluster? and, most importantly, is there any formula to estimate raw fs to gluster performance ratio for different setups? for instance: having a replicated volume, two bricks, fuse mountpoint to volume via non-congested 1Gbps or even a volume on single brick with fuse client mountpoing locally what percentage/fraction of raw

Здравствуйте, xen-users. Just test domU IO perfomance: sda1 configure via phy:/dev/sdb1. Benchmark with dbench (dbench -D /usr/src -s 10 -t 120) - 102 Mb/s Native sistem (mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt && dbench -D /mnt -s 10 -t 120) - 140 Mb/s How i can speedup dbench? -- С уважением, Vitaliy mailto:vitaliy.okulov@gmail.com