similar to: Preventing Windows from changing file permissions

Even though we allocate more, we should be updating inode i_size as per the arguments passed Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- Changes from V1: We should update i_size only if actual_len and cur_offset are both larger than i_size. Otherwise if actual_len is < i_size and cur_offset > i_size we may end up setting wrong i_size value

Hi, gdbserver-xen coredump after i step through a few lines of code. build dom0 with debug_domu. Enable debuginfo and frame pointer for dom U and attach the domu with gdbserver . In gdb put breakpoint at say sys_open and after going through few lines of code gdbserver-xen coredumps. The resulting core file has the below stack $gdb /usr/local/bin/gdbserver-xen ./core GNU gdb 6.3-debian

Richard, FYI. On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:05:42 +0530, Harsh Bora <harsh at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi Aneesh, > > Richard asked me if we have any plans to provide a solution for this use > case: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2011-September/msg00089.html > > IIUC, VirtFS as a rootfs is targeted towards this requirement only, > right? Any inputs ?

On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:28:52 -0800, Brad Boyer <flar at allandria.com> wrote: > > I have one suggestion about this part of the code. > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:04:45AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > <snip> > > > +/* > > + * ACL entries that have ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO set in ace->e_flags use the > > + * pointer values of these constants

Hi together, we have a Windows 2003 Active Directory Server, working together with Samba Version 3.0.2a-Debian. It seems everything (Kerberos authentication and so on) works fine. All the authentication is done by the windows 2003 server. My problem is, that I can't connect to a share via a windows xp client, when the share has an option "valid user" which defines a group of the

List, Sorry to trouble anyone, a google on my error from k3b lead me to a permissions issue, but after searching through several of the links (including a few forums) I've failed to turn up exactly what the permissions should be or if that is even an accurate solution. When running k3b I get an error stating that cdrecord did not exit properly. And k3b will not burn a cd. Running cdrecord

Alex, I could not agree more with you. BTW, perhaps you already know, but just in case: If you want to see the patches applied to a package during its history, and you don't need to dig into the sources themselves, you can query the changelog for an rpm package without having to download sources: rpm -q --changelog package for example for my samba-3.0.10-1.4E.2 rpm -q --changelog samba *

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 02/10/2015 06:23 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> add_smp(&lock->tickets.head, TICKET_LOCK_INC); >> if (READ_ONCE(lock->tickets.tail) & TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG) .. >> >> into something like >> >> val =

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 02/10/2015 06:23 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> add_smp(&lock->tickets.head, TICKET_LOCK_INC); >> if (READ_ONCE(lock->tickets.tail) & TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG) .. >> >> into something like >> >> val =

Dear List, I'm writing to gauge interest in new syntax for positional-only function parameters to be added to R. The pattern of functions accepting other functions as inputs and passing additional ... arguments to them is prevalent throughout the R ecosystem. Currently, however, all such functions must one way or another tackle the problem of inadvertently passing arguments meant to go to

Hello, Is there a parameter in smb.conf that prevent users to use drag and drop within Samba shares? I know this is a Winedow$ function, but some users (hum, hum) use Explorer to open their files and accidentally they drag and drop sometimes a directory in the root of the share to another directory in the root of the share. My samba server is member of a native W2k3 server Active Directory and

Hello, Can somebody of the Samba team explain me the difference of Fedora packages or Enterprise packages ( <http://enterprisesamba.com/> http://enterprisesamba.com/) of Samba on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? I tried to find any information about this subject, but googleing doesn't help me. The standard Samba package (3.0.10EL) of RHEL4 doesn't communicate with a W2k3 server

On Mar 14, 2014 3:41 PM, "Ady" <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > A few years ago, at popular request, I changed the default of the list > > to have a Reply-To: pointing at the list. I personally find it very > > annoying, and I would like to change the default back. > > > > Would people object to trying it? >

> Hi jerry, and hi everyone !!! > I've seen the bug 1319 has appeared... > (Remember I previously applied the 1315 ?) > Has this one something to do with ADS domain member and winbind > authentification for shares ? My Samba 3.0.4 server is an W2k3 ADS domain member, it uses winbind and kerberos as authentication for shares, so "security = ADS". I have the same

+llvmdev. I find this pretty surprising. Actually, we already use std::mutex and std::recursive_mutex in clang, lld, and other llvm projects, it's just a coincidence that it hadn't been introduced into LLVM until my commits. I'm not sure what the right thing to do here is. If I understand correctly, it seems like in order to encounter this, a) you must be using GCC, b) you must be

Hello, Is there a parameter in smb.conf that prevent users to use drag and drop within Samba shares? I know this is a Winedow$ function, but some users (hum, hum) use Explorer to open their files and accidentally they drag and drop sometimes a directory in the root of the share to another directory in the root of the share. My samba server is member of a native W2k3 server Active Directory

It sounds like this version of libstdc++ doesn't support std::recursive_mutex from C++11. This is really unfortunate, because we were hoping that moving to C++11 would allow us to use standard, portable threading primitives. Does this version of MinGW have any C++11 threading support? Is it just recursive_mutex that is missing, or do we have to avoid std::mutex, std::call_once, etc? lld

Hi, I've been trying to get dovecot2 running and kept having this error message: May 13 13:38:32 mail systemd[1]: Started Dovecot IMAP/POP3 email server. May 13 13:38:32 mail dovecot[2178]: doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf line 61: Unknown setting: ssl # dovecot --build-options Build options: ioloop=epoll notify=inotify ipv6 openssl

I inadvertently unplugged my Budgetone phone tonight and I think it went out and upgraded its firmware. It is now at 1.0.3.81. Does anyone know how new this might be? Suddenly things that have been working wonderfully before don't work--basically it seems to do the SIP stuff just fine but then all the RTP stuff breaks, even something as simple as retrieving my voicemail from a server on

I have RedHat 9.1 running. Installed Samba that comes along with the OS to test it out. When I was playing with it, I deleted the smb.conf file inadvertently. I uninstalled and reinstalled the Samba utilities, but that didn't help. How do I get back the default smb.conf file? Thanks in advance. Satish Kumar