similar to: Registry Settings for Windows 7

My DC's need to be upgraded to support audit logging a la  Setting up Audit Logging - SambaWiki | | | | Setting up Audit Logging - SambaWiki | | | Are there any big red flags/pitfalls not in the release notes when going straight to 4.8?

Okay I didn't read that. surprised that it should work with the databases as is. The dbcheck function was quite involved when it was run on the 4.5.5. update. On Thursday, 23 March 2017, 20:21, Ray Klassen <julius_ahenobarbus at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: After upgrade massive slowdown network wide. Does not make sense that it's the samba, but I've nothing left. Question

hi again. after some tests, (on my operational domain and on a new testdomain) i detected this behavior: on samba 4.11.6 sometimes the new DNS-records finisches on a wrong dns zone. the problem occurs, if more then 5 records are created with the same name in more then one domain zone for example: testa1.jupiter.mydom.org testa2.jupiter.mydom.org testa3.jupiter.mydom.org

Hai Christian, > Can someone reproduce this? No, tried, but sorry, works fine for me on my 4.11.6 server. And what is you try it like this. samba-tool dns add dc1.zone1.domain.de 0.168.192.in-addr.arpa 157 PTR zone1.domain.de -U Administrator samba-tool dns add dc1.zone1.domain.de 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa 157 PTR zone2.domain.de -U Administrator I tested on my production where i have 6

On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:59:56 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:55:24 +0200 > Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 12:51:33 +0100 > > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Failed to modify SPNs on

Hello list, I'm stuck since 2 days and I have no clue how to troubleshoot and solve that problem. Any help really really appreciated. Scenario: ========= I am using Samba 4.1.12/sernet on DC1 (172.19.100.1) and DC2 (172.19.100.2) with default [netlogon] and [sysvol] share only. I installed an additional samba4 server with fileserving role which is called MEMBERSRV1 (172.19.100.3), which is

On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 12:51:33 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Failed to modify SPNs on CN=db1,CN=Computers,DC=mydom,DC=lan: acl: > > > > spn validation failed for spn[TERMSRV/DB1.MYDOM] uac[0x1000] > > > > account[db1$] hostname[(null)] nbname[mydom] ntds[(null)] > > > > forest[mydom.lan] domain[mydom.lan]

Dear Rowland, our windows admin assured me that they have set uidNumber and gidNumber in the range. I have requested screenshots for confirmation. Now we are one step further: "getent passwd | grep mdecker" now lists the AD account. mdecker:*:13667:7142:Decker, Martin:/home/MYDOM/mdecker:/bin/false With "getent passwd mdecker" however, it shows

Hello, No it's a AD classicupgraded from a Samba 3 PDC Here's a user example from my DC uid=1116(MYDOM\begr00) gid=513(MYDOM\domain users) groupes=513(MYDOM\domain us ers),1151(MYDOM\evaluation),1214(MYDOM\procedures),12021(MYDOM\s13cadre),12041 (MYDOM\s13-grh),1264(MYDOM\zsbw),1001(MYDOM\s13),3000005(BUILTIN\users) my first user start at uid 1001 (1000 was the

On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 16:26:36 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 17:13:02 +0200 > Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:59:56 +0100 > > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:55:24 +0200 >

Hello there I've got two samba servers srv1 and srv2 smb.conf for srv1: netbios aliases srv1-alias smb.conf for srv2: netbios aliases srv2-alias DNS is configured all right and resolves the names. Each name has got its own IP address. Both servers are AD members, run as expected and can be connected to via their netbios and netbios alias names. If, for example, srv1 fails I want to add

Hello, I've got some log entries like these on our DCs: Failed to modify SPNs on CN=db1,CN=Computers,DC=mydom,DC=lan: acl: spn validation failed for spn[TERMSRV/DB1.MYDOM] uac[0x1000] account[db1$] hostname[(null)] nbname[mydom] ntds[(null)] forest[mydom.lan] domain[mydom.lan] At first I thought it was about missing SPN entries, but adding these did not resolve the problem: # samba-tool

Hi Rowland, On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:46:24 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Failed to modify SPNs on CN=db1,CN=Computers,DC=mydom,DC=lan: acl: > > spn validation failed for spn[TERMSRV/DB1.MYDOM] uac[0x1000] > > account[db1$] hostname[(null)] nbname[mydom] ntds[(null)] > > forest[mydom.lan] domain[mydom.lan] > > > > At

Thanks Rowland and Louis, after changing from ad to rid, i get all users listed with "getent passwd", not just the ones with uidNumber - which is good. But "getent passwd MYDOM\\mdecker" still does not resolve. In addition, no groups are listed with "getent group". Looking at winbindd debug, it seems that after trying getgrsid on the very first group "Exchange

Hi list, I am experimenting with two member servers (both samba4). I am using following configuration: membersrv:/etc/samba/smb.conf: ========================== [...] username map = /etc/samba/smbmap [...] membersrv:/etc/samba/smbmap: ========================= !root = MYDOM\johndoe MYDOM\foo MYDOM\bar MYDOM\Administrator Administrator So the domain users from my AD called "John Doe",

Hello, Lots of messages in smbd log file on a Samba file server, which is member of a Samba AD : [2018/07/24 10:30:00.822403, 0] ../source3/smbd/posix_acls.c:2080(create_canon_ace_lists)

Thank you for your feedback. I have changed the parameters, but still no success. winbind use default domain = yes idmap config * : range = 1000000-1999999 idmap config MYDOM : range = 100-999999 Regards, Martin 2017-08-18 15:00 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > See inline comments: > > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:40:54 +0200 >

Hi again, I just started to debug things on the samba4 side: When trying to mount the Windows NFS share, I get the following error on the samba4 dc (just grepping for nfs in the logs): auth_check_password_send: Checking password for unmapped user [S5DOM.TEST]\[nfs/nfsclient.mydom.test]@[] map_user_info_cracknames: Mapping user [MYDOM.TEST]\[nfs/nfsclient.mydom.test] from workstation []

Dear List, I am trying to set up Samba 3.6.25 (solaris 11.3 packaged) to provide unix file shares to windows users. I can successfully list groups and users with wbinfo -u / wbinfo -g, but I do not get any data with "getent group" or "getent passwd". In AD, we have set "gidNumber" Attribute for Group "Domain Users" to a value in the specified range

Okay, so I've just put the sernet repo file in my yum.repos.d directory and a yum update will elevate my samba server to the latest version. Is there any pitfall that is out there that I can avoid before yum updating. Centos 5.3 samba3-3.0.34-37 & related packages openldap-2.3.43-3.el5 & related packages I still have my samba3-3.0.34 packages squirreled away so I can force downgrade