similar to: Samba Secondary Groups

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "Samba Secondary Groups"

2008 Dec 09
0
check password script
Hi all, I'm quite new to all this, so please go easy on me if I don't quite seem to say the right things. (any advice is good advice) I have a 3.0.14a-debian samba install, with ldap auth using pam_unix (see smb.conf below) We want to implement a few password checks for complexity, so I have written a pretty basic script (see below) which definitely exits 0 on a good password
2002 Oct 11
1
automatic chi-square grouping in R
I'm doing some chi-square tests, and I recall some arbitrary rule that says each band must have at least 5 events in order for the test to be meaningful. Is there some way to do the banding automagically in R ? For instance, in the following survdiff, I'm trying to see if ADL affects survival. But when ADL=3,5 and 6, the number observed is too little. Anyway for me to tell R how to group
2009 Jun 25
1
pdbedit - password age
Hello, I try to force users to change password once a given period using his command: #pdbedit -P "maximum password age" -C 300 It works only for "new" users (users created after first first launch of this command), "old" users are not affected, passwords doesn't expire. How to do his for "old" users? I would be pleased for your help.
2008 Dec 09
2
Any possibility to apply policies on WinXP machines using samba 3.2.3 ?
Any possibility to apply policies on WinXP machines using samba 3.2.3 ? In samba documentation in : http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/PolicyMgmt.html There is references to apply policies in NT/2000 Server and winxp clients, but it's not clear to me that will run fine or not using samba 3.2.3+winxp machines. If exist a way, How ? I was create a local policies using
2012 Sep 25
2
[LLVMdev] Publication: Two LLVM-related papers
Hi, i've two papers that could be listed on the LLVM publication page. http://www.llvm.org/pubs/ The first paper describes an architecture description language and LLVM back-end generation out of an ADL. The second paper describes a cluster VLIW back-end for LLVM 2.9, just before this VLIW initiative started for LLVM. Kind regards, Timo Stripf Stripf, T.; Koenig, R.; Becker, J.; , "A
2011 Jun 22
2
[LLVMdev] Improving cast<> failure messages.
Would anyone object to an attempt to improve cast<> error messages by outputting the expected type and the type received? The interface I'm thinking of is to use ADL to do visitor-style lookup, so we don't need to change every client. In particular, for clients in clang, we can just create these functions implicitly from our TableGen-generated files. I'm not sure about
2009 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] patch for portability
On Dec 3, 2009, at 5:24 AM, Ahmed Charles wrote: > Sorry, always end up not replying to the list: > > The main issue with dealing with next this way is that people adding new uses of next will probably not be using c++0x and therefore won't know it's ambiguous and that it needs to be qualified. True. But when this code is compiled under C++0X you get an easy to diagnose, easy
2009 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] next
On Nov 16, 2009, at 10:49 AMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: > On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > >> >> On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: >> >>> In many places there is code that looks like: >>> >>> MBBI = next(MBBI); >>> >>> In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when
2013 Mar 27
2
FMOLS DOLS and ADL regression
Whether can any R package run Full modified OLS (Phillips and Hansen 1990 ), DOLS (Stock and Watson 1993) and ADL model (Pesaran and Shin 2001) for cointegrated VAR model? I cannot find any useful order in VAR and SVAR package. Thanks. Eric Wang [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2012 Mar 08
1
ADL in auto.arima [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Hi, I am trying to run ADL model by using auto.arima in package "forecast". I put two time series,x and xreg, in the formula, but got message: Error in nsdiffs(xx) : Non seasonal data. Any one can tell how to use it? Thanks Richard *************************************************************************************************** IMPORTANT: * This transmission is intended for the
2009 Nov 14
5
[LLVMdev] next
In many places there is code that looks like: MBBI = next(MBBI); In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these calls are made. And due to ADL the above call becomes ambiguous: llvm::next or std::next? I recommend: MBBI = llvm::next(MBBI); -Howard
2009 Nov 16
4
[LLVMdev] next
On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: > >> In many places there is code that looks like: >> >> MBBI = next(MBBI); >> >> In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these >> calls are made. And due to ADL the above call becomes ambiguous: >>
2009 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] next
I am pretty sure the .cpp files always explicitly use "llvm" namespace. Look for: using namespace llvm; Is that sufficient? Evan On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Howard Hinnant wrote: > In many places there is code that looks like: > > MBBI = next(MBBI); > > In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these > calls are made. And due to ADL
2009 Nov 16
2
[LLVMdev] next
Evan Cheng wrote: > I am pretty sure the .cpp files always explicitly use "llvm" namespace. Look for: > using namespace llvm; > > Is that sufficient? > No; once it's visible through ADL (because ilist<>::iterator extends std::iterator) there's no hiding or precedence mechanism we can exploit. On the other hand, AFAICT std::next is interchangeable with
2009 Nov 16
1
[LLVMdev] next
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:49:42 -0800, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > I am pretty sure the .cpp files always explicitly use "llvm" namespace. > Look for: > using namespace llvm; > > Is that sufficient? > No. To prevent ADL from finding std::next, you need an explicitly qualified name at the call site. Sebastian
2009 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] next
Howard Hinnant wrote: > On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > >> "next" is a popular name; if it breaks llvm, I'd expect this standards change to break a lot of existing code. Do you really want to do that? >> > > I'm happy to open an LWG issue for you on this subject. Here are directions on submitting an issue: > >
2015 Mar 06
2
Hyper-dual numbers in R
Hi, Has anyone in R core thought about providing "hyper-dual numbers" in R? Hyper-dual (HD) numbers, invented by Jeffrey Fike at Stanford, are useful for computing exact second-order derivatives (e.g., Hessian). HD numbers are extensions of complex numbers. They are like "quaternions" and have 4 parts to them (one real and 3 non-real). They seem to be available in Julia.
2007 Mar 14
0
Question about testing cointegration using Autoregressive distributed Model (ADL)
Hi,I'm just wondering if there is any package for testing cointegration with ADL model. I saw a bunch of packages and list of email thread. There seemed to be no such a specific method. I am following this paper on how to test using ADL but I don't have a tool. http://www.wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de/~hassler/ha-wo.pdfAny help would be really appreciated. Thank you.Taco [[alternative HTML
2011 Apr 12
1
Cargar lista de variables en función
Hola compañeros, Soy nuevo y me disculparan si la pregunta es muy básica. Quiero crear una función que me permita recibir variables que pueden ser 2, 3 o más, la idea es llamar esta función e indicarle la ruta y el nombre de las variables para luego realizar algún análisis. Mi idea es la siguiente: library(foreign) FDatos <- function(Ruta,Nombre,Variables){ Datos <-
2009 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] next
C++ newbie question: But doesn't all the code in LLVM avoid "using namespace std"? It seems like the solution is to just never use both the llvm and std namespace in the C++ file. Reid On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:21 AM, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote: > Evan Cheng wrote: >> I am pretty sure the .cpp files always explicitly use "llvm" namespace.